[rules-dev] Parameterized Evaluator Definition using \u2282 as parameter

Well, yes, I'm naughty. I've implemented a parameterized evaluator, using Unicode codepoint U+2282<http://www.fileformat.info/info/unicode/char/2282/index.htm>as a parameter. But the DRL parser refuses to accept this (as part of square_chunk_data): Line 60:59 no viable alternative at input '' which indicates that the character isn't recognized at all. I think this happens because, outside of strings, codepoints beyond U+007F aren't accepted anywhere except those explicitly specified as IdentifierStart and IdentifierPart. Perhaps square_chunk_data after an operator identifier could be made to behave more like a string. Admittedly, this is esoteric, but it sure does look dazzling ;-) Cheers -W