Have you set the RuleFlowId of the Rule Flow you're designing? Click on the white background and change the RuleFlowId in the properties view. This is the Id of the RuleFlow to invoke with startProcess(<RuleFlowId>). Any rules with "ruleflow-group" attribute set to match those in your RuleFlow will execute. Any rules without a "ruleflow-group" attribute set will execute on FireAllRules(). I hope this solves your problem. CC'ed to Users Group for information. -----Original Message----- From: rules-dev-bounces(a)lists.jboss.org [mailto:rules-dev-bounces@lists.jboss.org] On Behalf Of Mahler, Bjoern (EXTERN: LINEAS) Sent: 14 May 2007 12:18 To: rules-dev(a)lists.jboss.org Subject: [rules-dev] Rule-Flow in Rules 4.0 M2 and ruleFlowGroups Hello... I don't know whether it's a bug or something else... - i'm currently evaluating the new version m2 and especially the rule-flow feature, which would be the yet missing part for us to use drools. So after creating a testflow.rf with your editor i've put the created .rfm-file in the context as sugested on the blog/release-notes: processBuilder.addProcessFromFile(new InputStreamReader(DroolsTest.class.getResourceAsStream( "/testflow.rfm" ) ) ); After invoking the rules with workingMemory.startProcess("test"); and/or workingMemory.fireAllRules(); nothing happened... A look in the sources and the rfm-xml-file shows, that the element <ruleFlowGroup> is empty! I would have expected the name of the group at this point... After changing this to the desired string, the behaviour looks more expecting ;) The problem is, that the .rfm file is regenerated after editing the rf-file so changes to that will be lost... Is it a bug or did i something wrong? TIA Björn _______________________________________________ rules-dev mailing list rules-dev(a)lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev