This would be better for the user list I think - other users could
provide advice - this list is for developers on the tool itself.
Thanks,
Michael.
On Tue, Sep 1, 2009 at 9:05 PM, premkumar<premkumar.sivanandan(a)gmail.com> wrote:
Hi,
We are evaluating the Drools Rule engine with Drools flow as work flow
in web based j2ee project. The following are important criteria
1) Customize Rules and Workflow through Web UI
2) Admin user can see all of the items in workflow in UI (View job queue:
current queue, executed jobs, exceptions)
3) Integrate with Calendaring/Scheduling
4) Versioning of process definitions
5) Ability to migrate process instances between process versions
6) Rule Actions can be web services
7) Web Service can be rule input
8) Web service can be actor in process
9) Delete/cancel process definitions at runtime
10) Conditional elements nesting
11) Control steps should allow parallel flows within steps for synchronizing
of joining parallel flows
12) process simulation
Please can any one provide your inputs on the above mentioned areas to help
us this evaluation process.
Thanks
Prem
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Evaluation-of-Drool-Rule-Engine-with-Drools-Flow-tp...
Sent from the drools - dev mailing list archive at
Nabble.com.
_______________________________________________
rules-dev mailing list
rules-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev
--
Michael D Neale
home:
www.michaelneale.net
blog:
michaelneale.blogspot.com