On 13 July 2011 17:09, John <jfullard(a)progeny.net <mailto:jfullard@progeny.net>> wrote: Interesting... I have no idea why the KnowledgeBuilder would compile the DRL differently than the KnowledgeAgent, There's a bug in the incremental build as done by the KnowledgeAgent. If the KA configuration property drools.agent.newInstance is set to false, some type information is not put into the new KBase. -W

but I don't think I had this problem in 5.1.1. I'm up and running now with the type fully declared in DRL and I can live with that. Thanks for looking into this. -- View this message in context: http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/NPE-on-fact-insertion-if-rule-has-slidi... Sent from the Drools: User forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com. _______________________________________________ rules-users mailing list rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org <mailto:rules-users@lists.jboss.org> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users _______________________________________________ rules-dev mailing list rules-dev(a)lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev

On 14 July 2011 11:35, Mark Proctor <mproctor(a)codehaus.org&gt; wrote: > On 14/07/2011 10:10, Wolfgang Laun wrote: > > On 13 July 2011 17:09, John <jfullard(a)progeny.net&gt; wrote: > >> Interesting... I have no idea why the KnowledgeBuilder would compile the >> DRL >> differently than the KnowledgeAgent, > > > There's a bug in the incremental build as done by the KnowledgeAgent. If > the KA configuration property drools.agent.newInstance is set to false, some > type information is not put into the new KBase. > -W > > This might be related to the kagent using a HashMap instead of a > LinkedHashMap to store resources, thus any updates may not be applied in the > order that resources where defined.... > Not likely with a single DRL in the Change Set XML and on the first build. > > I believe estaban is working on this issue and it may already be fixed. > Not yet. -W > Mark > > > >> but I don't think I had this problem in >> 5.1.1. I'm up and running now with the type fully declared in DRL and I >> can >> live with that. Thanks for looking into this. >> >> -- >> View this message in context: >> http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/NPE-on-fact-insertion-if-rule-has-slidi... >> Sent from the Drools: User forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com. >> _______________________________________________ >> rules-users mailing list >> rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org >> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users >> > > > > _______________________________________________ > rules-dev mailing listrules-dev@lists.jboss.orghttps://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev > > > > _______________________________________________ > rules-dev mailing list > rules-dev(a)lists.jboss.org > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev > >