7:55 a.m.
Getting this this morning:
java.lang.NoSuchMethodError:
org.drools.spi.DeclarationScopeResolver.([Ljava/util/Map;Ljava/util/Stack;)V
at org.drools.rule.builder.RuleBuildContext.(RuleBuildContext.java:72)
at org.drools.compiler.PackageBuilder.addRule(PackageBuilder.java:1198)
at org.drools.compiler.PackageBuilder.addPackage(PackageBuilder.java:629)
at
org.drools.compiler.PackageBuilder.addPackageFromDrl(PackageBuilder.java:278)
at
org.drools.compiler.PackageBuilder.addKnowledgeResource(PackageBuilder.java:451)
at
org.drools.builder.impl.KnowledgeBuilderImpl.add(KnowledgeBuilderImpl.java:28)
(other stack trace elements snipped for brevity)
I know I'm depending on a snapshot and I have no expectation of stability.
Just wanted to give a heads up.
Best,
Laird
--
View this message in context:
http://drools-java-rules-engine.46999.n3.nabble.com/Drools-5-2-0-SNAPSHOT...
Sent from the Drools - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
9:13 a.m.
If I make sure that drools-core is set to version 5.2.0-20110217.093813-91 (a
timestamped snapshot), then everything works fine. I tried all the other
more recent timestamped snapshots, but had to fall back to this one.
Best,
Laird
--
View this message in context:
http://drools-java-rules-engine.46999.n3.nabble.com/Drools-5-2-0-SNAPSHOT...
Sent from the Drools - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
11:54 a.m.
Just checking in to see if anyone is alive on this list; downloaded a new
drools-core SNAPSHOT today which did not fix the problem.
Best,
Laird
--
View this message in context:
http://drools-java-rules-engine.46999.n3.nabble.com/Drools-5-2-0-SNAPSHOT...
Sent from the Drools - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
1 p.m.
Drools trunk has been unstable from some weeks now. According to Hudson (
https://hudson.jboss.org/hudson/view/Drools%20jBPM/) it has been never built
since the codebase was split up.
I think hudson should be green soon. But you are not the only one waiting
for it :)
Best Regards,
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
Esteban Aliverti
- Developer @ http://www.plugtree.com
- Blog @ http://ilesteban.wordpress.com
On Fri, Mar 11, 2011 at 2:54 PM, ljnelson <ljnelson(a)gmail.com> wrote:
8:40 a.m.
New subject: Drools 5.2.0-SNAPSHOT: NoSuchMethodError => Drools broken
Laird,
We're alive and you're not alone at all :)
We 're all waiting on Edson and Mark to fix this for us.
Guvnor and droolsjbpm-tools (=eclipse plugin) are also broken meanwhile.
The root of the problem is that both Mark and Edson were working on big
changes when the clearly announced split-up had to be executed.
The unfinished problems of those 2 big changes multiplied against each
other and they 've been working on getting them fixed in the last few weeks.
Because the split-up renamed a lot of artefacts etc, it's not practical
to use guvnor/droolsjbpm-tool on the latest working snapshots.
Since recently, drools-core is testing successfully, but drools-compiler
isn't, so only the former is deployed, so this is also annoying,
I am investigating that part:
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5196203/configure-a-hudson-maven-job-t...
Op 11-03-11 20:00, Esteban Aliverti schreef:
--
With kind regards,
Geoffrey De Smet
4:07 p.m.
New subject: Drools 5.2.0-SNAPSHOT: NoSuchMethodError => Drools broken
Jari also encountered this problem.
The problem is caused by nexus having recent drools-core snapshots and
old drools-compiler snapshots (as the second fails).
0) We cannot revert to a previous working timestamp, because there is no
working timestamp since the artifacts have been renamed (=split-up).
1) As a workaround there's been decided to /deploy test-failing
snapshots of drools-compiler, drools-decisiontables, drools-verifier, .../
Most of the tests work. This situation will give a similar experience as
when we had the monolithic build and there were test failures in
drools-compiler on trunk.
Let's hope hudson is blue soon.
2) The bigger issue is that /drools-core should not be deployed if
drools-compiler fails/.
Once hudson decently supports maven 3 jobs, I 'll fix that.
Op 13-03-11 14:40, Geoffrey De Smet schreef:
--
With kind regards,
Geoffrey De Smet
5:14 p.m.
New subject: Drools 5.2.0-SNAPSHOT: NoSuchMethodError => Drools broken
Geoffrey can you please ping me when this problem is solved?
Or at least when we have new snapshots for compiler and core?
Thanks for the report!
On Tue, Mar 22, 2011 at 6:07 PM, Geoffrey De Smet
<ge0ffrey.spam(a)gmail.com>wrote:
--
- CTO @ http://www.plugtree.com
- MyJourney @ http://salaboy.wordpress.com
- Co-Founder @ http://www.jbug.com.ar
- Salatino "Salaboy" Mauricio -
6:11 p.m.
New subject: Drools 5.2.0-SNAPSHOT: NoSuchMethodError => Drools broken
It appears that these changes have been made. mvn -U brought down some new
snapshots and all my prior NoSuchMethodError problems went away.
Now I am encountering (not surprisingly) other issues.
Specifically, the following rule:
rule "Testing contains"
dialect "mvel"
when
Response( $answerSelections : answerSelections )
AnswerSelection( answer.ID in (2, 3) )
then
System.out.println("Testing contains activated")
end
...produces an error message like this:
[Error: Failed to compile: 1 compilation error(s):
- (1,9) unqualified type in strict mode for: ID]
[Near : {... Unknown ....}]
^
[Line: 1, Column: 0] : [Rule name='Testing contains']
AnswerSelection has a getAnswer() method, and Answer has a getID() method.
This rule passed mere days ago. I seem to recall the notion of
distinguishing between typesafe and non-typesafe constructs is a new 5.2.0
idea; maybe this is the next thing to need to be fixed?
Thanks,
Laird
On Tue, Mar 22, 2011 at 6:15 PM, salaboy [via Drools - Java Rules Engine] <
ml-node+2717564-400506162-10124(a)n3.nabble.com> wrote:
--
View this message in context:
http://drools-java-rules-engine.46999.n3.nabble.com/Drools-5-2-0-SNAPSHOT...
Sent from the Drools - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
2:33 a.m.
New subject: Drools 5.2.0-SNAPSHOT: NoSuchMethodError => Drools broken
1) was executed, so
the new snapshot for compiler, verifier, ... is online (the new core
snapshot has been online for about 2 weeks already).
Op 22-03-11 23:14, Mauricio Salatino schreef:
--
With kind regards,
Geoffrey De Smet
5121
days inactive
5134
days old
8 comments
4 participants
participants (4)
-
Esteban Aliverti -
Geoffrey De Smet -
ljnelson -
Mauricio Salatino