Hi, The org.kie.api.osgi.Activator class of kie project needs the class ServiceRegistryImpl (& Interface ServiceRegistry of kie internal) to register an OSGI Service (Interface) this.serviceRegistry = bc.registerService( ServiceRegistry.class.getName(), ServiceRegistryImpl.getInstance(), new Hashtable() ); but the maven module kie api does not have a dependency with kie internal as the class ServiceRegistry & ServiceRegistryImpl are part of the module kie internal & package org.kie.internal.utils Questions : - What are the plans regarding to the Activator of Kie api bundle - what does it want to do ? - Can we add the missing dependency in kie api project ? Regards, -- Charles Moulliard Apache Committer / Sr. Enterprise Architect (RedHat) Twitter : @cmoulliard | Blog : http://cmoulliard.blogspot.com _______________________________________________ rules-dev mailing list rules-dev(a)lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev

Charles, I saw that you removed singleton:=true in your commit. This is because do you plan to have more than one version of drools/jbpm running at same time? regards, Cristiano 2013/3/25 Cristiano Gavião <cvgaviao(a)gmail.com&gt; > Charles, > > I already changed the manifest generation of kie and other drools > modules. I created some pull requests for such changes. > > Next thing that I planned to do this week(Wed) was to review each > Activator, I think we could improve it... > > regards, > > Cristiano > > > On 25/03/13 04:52, Charles Moulliard wrote: > > Hi, > > The org.kie.api.osgi.Activator class of kie project needs the class > ServiceRegistryImpl (& Interface ServiceRegistry of kie internal) to > register an OSGI Service (Interface) > > this.serviceRegistry = bc.registerService( > ServiceRegistry.class.getName(), > > ServiceRegistryImpl.getInstance(), > new Hashtable() ); > > but the maven module kie api does not have a dependency with kie > internal as the class ServiceRegistry & ServiceRegistryImpl are part of > the module kie internal & package org.kie.internal.utils > > Questions : > - What are the plans regarding to the Activator of Kie api bundle - what > does it want to do ? > - Can we add the missing dependency in kie api project ? > > Regards, > -- > Charles Moulliard > Apache Committer / Sr. Enterprise Architect (RedHat) > Twitter : @cmoulliard | Blog : http://cmoulliard.blogspot.com > > > > _______________________________________________ > rules-dev mailing listrules-dev@lists.jboss.orghttps://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev > > > -- "Tudo vale a pena se a alma não é pequena..." _______________________________________________ rules-dev mailing list rules-dev(a)lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev

well, I never seen any error related to singleton attribute at Felix or Equinox. The error you have reported seems to be related to what is being done (and not being undone) inside the activator... 2013/3/25 Charles Moulliard <ch007m(a)gmail.com&gt; > Not at all but using singleton := true option generates error when we do > a stop, update start on Apache Karaf. > We never used that property to generate all the bundles that we have in > the project Karaf, ServiceMix, Geronimo, ... > > > On Mon, Mar 25, 2013 at 4:34 PM, Cristiano Gavião <cvgaviao(a)gmail.com&gt;wrote: > >> Charles, >> >> I saw that you removed singleton:=true in your commit. This is because >> do you plan to have more than one version of drools/jbpm running at same >> time? >> >> regards, >> >> Cristiano >> >> >> 2013/3/25 Cristiano Gavião <cvgaviao(a)gmail.com&gt; >> >>> Charles, >>> >>> I already changed the manifest generation of kie and other drools >>> modules. I created some pull requests for such changes. >>> >>> Next thing that I planned to do this week(Wed) was to review each >>> Activator, I think we could improve it... >>> >>> regards, >>> >>> Cristiano >>> >>> >>> On 25/03/13 04:52, Charles Moulliard wrote: >>> >>> Hi, >>> >>> The org.kie.api.osgi.Activator class of kie project needs the class >>> ServiceRegistryImpl (& Interface ServiceRegistry of kie internal) to >>> register an OSGI Service (Interface) >>> >>> this.serviceRegistry = bc.registerService( >>> ServiceRegistry.class.getName(), >>> >>> ServiceRegistryImpl.getInstance(), >>> new Hashtable() ); >>> >>> but the maven module kie api does not have a dependency with kie >>> internal as the class ServiceRegistry & ServiceRegistryImpl are part of >>> the module kie internal & package org.kie.internal.utils >>> >>> Questions : >>> - What are the plans regarding to the Activator of Kie api bundle - >>> what does it want to do ? >>> - Can we add the missing dependency in kie api project ? >>> >>> Regards, >>> -- >>> Charles Moulliard >>> Apache Committer / Sr. Enterprise Architect (RedHat) >>> Twitter : @cmoulliard | Blog : http://cmoulliard.blogspot.com >>> >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> rules-dev mailing listrules-dev@lists.jboss.orghttps://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev >>> >>> >>> >> >> >> -- >> "Tudo vale a pena se a alma não é pequena..." >> _______________________________________________ >> rules-dev mailing list >> rules-dev(a)lists.jboss.org >> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev >> > > > > -- > Charles Moulliard > Apache Committer / Sr. Enterprise Architect (RedHat) > Twitter : @cmoulliard | Blog : http://cmoulliard.blogspot.com > > > _______________________________________________ > rules-dev mailing list > rules-dev(a)lists.jboss.org > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev > -- "Tudo vale a pena se a alma não é pequena..." _______________________________________________ rules-dev mailing list rules-dev(a)lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev

I'm creating a pax-exam project where I will run some test on top of equinox and felix. After I commit and push it maybe you could add karaf stuffs. so it could help us to identify the reason of the error you are talking about... On 25/03/13 14:19, Charles Moulliard wrote: There was another error when using singleton := true. On Mon, Mar 25, 2013 at 6:15 PM, Cristiano Gavião <cvgaviao(a)gmail.com&gt;wrote: > well, I never seen any error related to singleton attribute at Felix or > Equinox. > > The error you have reported seems to be related to what is being done > (and not being undone) inside the activator... > > > 2013/3/25 Charles Moulliard <ch007m(a)gmail.com&gt; > >> Not at all but using singleton := true option generates error when we do >> a stop, update start on Apache Karaf. >> We never used that property to generate all the bundles that we have in >> the project Karaf, ServiceMix, Geronimo, ... >> >> >> On Mon, Mar 25, 2013 at 4:34 PM, Cristiano Gavião <cvgaviao(a)gmail.com&gt;wrote: >> >>> Charles, >>> >>> I saw that you removed singleton:=true in your commit. This is because >>> do you plan to have more than one version of drools/jbpm running at same >>> time? >>> >>> regards, >>> >>> Cristiano >>> >>> >>> 2013/3/25 Cristiano Gavião <cvgaviao(a)gmail.com&gt; >>> >>>> Charles, >>>> >>>> I already changed the manifest generation of kie and other drools >>>> modules. I created some pull requests for such changes. >>>> >>>> Next thing that I planned to do this week(Wed) was to review each >>>> Activator, I think we could improve it... >>>> >>>> regards, >>>> >>>> Cristiano >>>> >>>> >>>> On 25/03/13 04:52, Charles Moulliard wrote: >>>> >>>> Hi, >>>> >>>> The org.kie.api.osgi.Activator class of kie project needs the class >>>> ServiceRegistryImpl (& Interface ServiceRegistry of kie internal) to >>>> register an OSGI Service (Interface) >>>> >>>> this.serviceRegistry = bc.registerService( >>>> ServiceRegistry.class.getName(), >>>> >>>> ServiceRegistryImpl.getInstance(), >>>> new Hashtable() ); >>>> >>>> but the maven module kie api does not have a dependency with kie >>>> internal as the class ServiceRegistry & ServiceRegistryImpl are part of >>>> the module kie internal & package org.kie.internal.utils >>>> >>>> Questions : >>>> - What are the plans regarding to the Activator of Kie api bundle - >>>> what does it want to do ? >>>> - Can we add the missing dependency in kie api project ? >>>> >>>> Regards, >>>> -- >>>> Charles Moulliard >>>> Apache Committer / Sr. Enterprise Architect (RedHat) >>>> Twitter : @cmoulliard | Blog : http://cmoulliard.blogspot.com >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> rules-dev mailing listrules-dev@lists.jboss.orghttps://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev >>>> >>>> >>>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> "Tudo vale a pena se a alma não é pequena..." >>> _______________________________________________ >>> rules-dev mailing list >>> rules-dev(a)lists.jboss.org >>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev >>> >> >> >> >> -- >> Charles Moulliard >> Apache Committer / Sr. Enterprise Architect (RedHat) >> Twitter : @cmoulliard | Blog : http://cmoulliard.blogspot.com >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> rules-dev mailing list >> rules-dev(a)lists.jboss.org >> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev >> > > > _______________________________________________ > rules-dev mailing list > rules-dev(a)lists.jboss.org > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev > -- Charles Moulliard Apache Committer / Sr. Enterprise Architect (RedHat) Twitter : @cmoulliard | Blog : http://cmoulliard.blogspot.com _______________________________________________ rules-dev mailing listrules-dev@lists.jboss.orghttps://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev _______________________________________________ rules-dev mailing list rules-dev(a)lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev

Hello, I already look at it. The problem is that this tests are using an old version (2.x) of pax-exam and using a karaf specific api too. That version will be dropped by karaf team soon. see [1] and [2]. Btw, Pax-exam was improved a lot in version 3.x. [1] - http://karaf.922171.n3.nabble.com/Discuss-Karaf-and-Pax-Exam-3-x-td402807... [2] - https://ops4j1.jira.com/browse/PAXEXAM-503 regards, Cristiano 2013/3/27 Charles Moulliard <ch007m(a)gmail.com&gt; > Christiano, > > Can you please have a look here as there is already a pax-exam test for > karaf ( > https://github.com/droolsjbpm/droolsjbpm-integration/tree/master/drools-o...) > ? > > Regards, > > Charles > > > On Tue, Mar 26, 2013 at 11:11 AM, Cristiano Gavião <cvgaviao(a)gmail.com&gt;wrote: > >> I'm creating a pax-exam project where I will run some test on top of >> equinox and felix. >> >> After I commit and push it maybe you could add karaf stuffs. so it could >> help us to identify the reason of the error you are talking about... >> >> >> On 25/03/13 14:19, Charles Moulliard wrote: >> >> There was another error when using singleton := true. >> >> >> On Mon, Mar 25, 2013 at 6:15 PM, Cristiano Gavião <cvgaviao(a)gmail.com&gt;wrote: >> >>> well, I never seen any error related to singleton attribute at Felix or >>> Equinox. >>> >>> The error you have reported seems to be related to what is being done >>> (and not being undone) inside the activator... >>> >>> >>> 2013/3/25 Charles Moulliard <ch007m(a)gmail.com&gt; >>> >>>> Not at all but using singleton := true option generates error when we >>>> do a stop, update start on Apache Karaf. >>>> We never used that property to generate all the bundles that we have >>>> in the project Karaf, ServiceMix, Geronimo, ... >>>> >>>> >>>> On Mon, Mar 25, 2013 at 4:34 PM, Cristiano Gavião <cvgaviao(a)gmail.com&gt;wrote: >>>> >>>>> Charles, >>>>> >>>>> I saw that you removed singleton:=true in your commit. This is >>>>> because do you plan to have more than one version of drools/jbpm running at >>>>> same time? >>>>> >>>>> regards, >>>>> >>>>> Cristiano >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> 2013/3/25 Cristiano Gavião <cvgaviao(a)gmail.com&gt; >>>>> >>>>>> Charles, >>>>>> >>>>>> I already changed the manifest generation of kie and other drools >>>>>> modules. I created some pull requests for such changes. >>>>>> >>>>>> Next thing that I planned to do this week(Wed) was to review each >>>>>> Activator, I think we could improve it... >>>>>> >>>>>> regards, >>>>>> >>>>>> Cristiano >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> On 25/03/13 04:52, Charles Moulliard wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> Hi, >>>>>> >>>>>> The org.kie.api.osgi.Activator class of kie project needs the >>>>>> class ServiceRegistryImpl (& Interface ServiceRegistry of kie internal) to >>>>>> register an OSGI Service (Interface) >>>>>> >>>>>> this.serviceRegistry = bc.registerService( >>>>>> ServiceRegistry.class.getName(), >>>>>> >>>>>> ServiceRegistryImpl.getInstance(), >>>>>> new Hashtable() ); >>>>>> >>>>>> but the maven module kie api does not have a dependency with kie >>>>>> internal as the class ServiceRegistry & ServiceRegistryImpl are part of >>>>>> the module kie internal & package org.kie.internal.utils >>>>>> >>>>>> Questions : >>>>>> - What are the plans regarding to the Activator of Kie api bundle - >>>>>> what does it want to do ? >>>>>> - Can we add the missing dependency in kie api project ? >>>>>> >>>>>> Regards, >>>>>> -- >>>>>> Charles Moulliard >>>>>> Apache Committer / Sr. Enterprise Architect (RedHat) >>>>>> Twitter : @cmoulliard | Blog : http://cmoulliard.blogspot.com >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>> rules-dev mailing listrules-dev@lists.jboss.orghttps://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> "Tudo vale a pena se a alma não é pequena..." >>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>> rules-dev mailing list >>>>> rules-dev(a)lists.jboss.org >>>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Charles Moulliard >>>> Apache Committer / Sr. Enterprise Architect (RedHat) >>>> Twitter : @cmoulliard | Blog : http://cmoulliard.blogspot.com >>>> >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> rules-dev mailing list >>>> rules-dev(a)lists.jboss.org >>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev >>>> >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> rules-dev mailing list >>> rules-dev(a)lists.jboss.org >>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev >>> >> >> >> >> -- >> Charles Moulliard >> Apache Committer / Sr. Enterprise Architect (RedHat) >> Twitter : @cmoulliard | Blog : http://cmoulliard.blogspot.com >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> rules-dev mailing listrules-dev@lists.jboss.orghttps://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> rules-dev mailing list >> rules-dev(a)lists.jboss.org >> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev >> > > > > -- > Charles Moulliard > Apache Committer / Sr. Enterprise Architect (RedHat) > Twitter : @cmoulliard | Blog : http://cmoulliard.blogspot.com > > > _______________________________________________ > rules-dev mailing list > rules-dev(a)lists.jboss.org > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev > -- "Tudo vale a pena se a alma não é pequena..." _______________________________________________ rules-dev mailing list rules-dev(a)lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev

I won't change that code for while... It is still be there until you decide to move it to the new one. ;) Btw, I have two questions: 1)what do you think about to use Declarative Services to register the services instead do it manually at activator ? 2) how are you dealing with poi-ooxml dependency in drools-decisiontables? there is no osgified jar for it... 2013/3/27 Charles Moulliard <ch007m(a)gmail.com&gt; > Hi Christiano, > > I prefer that first we finalize the OSGI bundles (drools-decisiontables, > drools-jpa, drools-jbpm, ...) before changing pax-exam code which is > working and also used by Apache Camel/Karaf projects ;-) > > Regards, > > Charles > > > On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 1:44 PM, Cristiano Gavião <cvgaviao(a)gmail.com&gt;wrote: > >> Hello, >> >> I already look at it. The problem is that this tests are using an old >> version (2.x) of pax-exam and using a karaf specific api too. >> That version will be dropped by karaf team soon. see [1] and [2]. >> >> Btw, Pax-exam was improved a lot in version 3.x. >> >> [1] - >> http://karaf.922171.n3.nabble.com/Discuss-Karaf-and-Pax-Exam-3-x-td402807... >> [2] - https://ops4j1.jira.com/browse/PAXEXAM-503 >> >> regards, >> >> Cristiano >> >> >> >> 2013/3/27 Charles Moulliard <ch007m(a)gmail.com&gt; >> >>> Christiano, >>> >>> Can you please have a look here as there is already a pax-exam test for >>> karaf ( >>> https://github.com/droolsjbpm/droolsjbpm-integration/tree/master/drools-o...) >>> ? >>> >>> Regards, >>> >>> Charles >>> >>> >>> On Tue, Mar 26, 2013 at 11:11 AM, Cristiano Gavião <cvgaviao(a)gmail.com&gt;wrote: >>> >>>> I'm creating a pax-exam project where I will run some test on top of >>>> equinox and felix. >>>> >>>> After I commit and push it maybe you could add karaf stuffs. so it >>>> could help us to identify the reason of the error you are talking about... >>>> >>>> >>>> On 25/03/13 14:19, Charles Moulliard wrote: >>>> >>>> There was another error when using singleton := true. >>>> >>>> >>>> On Mon, Mar 25, 2013 at 6:15 PM, Cristiano Gavião <cvgaviao(a)gmail.com&gt;wrote: >>>> >>>>> well, I never seen any error related to singleton attribute at Felix >>>>> or Equinox. >>>>> >>>>> The error you have reported seems to be related to what is being done >>>>> (and not being undone) inside the activator... >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> 2013/3/25 Charles Moulliard <ch007m(a)gmail.com&gt; >>>>> >>>>>> Not at all but using singleton := true option generates error when >>>>>> we do a stop, update start on Apache Karaf. >>>>>> We never used that property to generate all the bundles that we have >>>>>> in the project Karaf, ServiceMix, Geronimo, ... >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> On Mon, Mar 25, 2013 at 4:34 PM, Cristiano Gavião < >>>>>> cvgaviao(a)gmail.com&gt; wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> Charles, >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I saw that you removed singleton:=true in your commit. This is >>>>>>> because do you plan to have more than one version of drools/jbpm running at >>>>>>> same time? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> regards, >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Cristiano >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> 2013/3/25 Cristiano Gavião <cvgaviao(a)gmail.com&gt; >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Charles, >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> I already changed the manifest generation of kie and other drools >>>>>>>> modules. I created some pull requests for such changes. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Next thing that I planned to do this week(Wed) was to review each >>>>>>>> Activator, I think we could improve it... >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> regards, >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Cristiano >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On 25/03/13 04:52, Charles Moulliard wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Hi, >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> The org.kie.api.osgi.Activator class of kie project needs the >>>>>>>> class ServiceRegistryImpl (& Interface ServiceRegistry of kie internal) to >>>>>>>> register an OSGI Service (Interface) >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> this.serviceRegistry = bc.registerService( >>>>>>>> ServiceRegistry.class.getName(), >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> ServiceRegistryImpl.getInstance(), >>>>>>>> new Hashtable() >>>>>>>> ); >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> but the maven module kie api does not have a dependency with kie >>>>>>>> internal as the class ServiceRegistry & ServiceRegistryImpl are part of >>>>>>>> the module kie internal & package org.kie.internal.utils >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Questions : >>>>>>>> - What are the plans regarding to the Activator of Kie api bundle >>>>>>>> - what does it want to do ? >>>>>>>> - Can we add the missing dependency in kie api project ? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Regards, >>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>> Charles Moulliard >>>>>>>> Apache Committer / Sr. Enterprise Architect (RedHat) >>>>>>>> Twitter : @cmoulliard | Blog : http://cmoulliard.blogspot.com >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>>>> rules-dev mailing listrules-dev@lists.jboss.orghttps://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> -- >>>>>>> "Tudo vale a pena se a alma não é pequena..." >>>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>>> rules-dev mailing list >>>>>>> rules-dev(a)lists.jboss.org >>>>>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> -- >>>>>> Charles Moulliard >>>>>> Apache Committer / Sr. Enterprise Architect (RedHat) >>>>>> Twitter : @cmoulliard | Blog : http://cmoulliard.blogspot.com >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>> rules-dev mailing list >>>>>> rules-dev(a)lists.jboss.org >>>>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>> rules-dev mailing list >>>>> rules-dev(a)lists.jboss.org >>>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Charles Moulliard >>>> Apache Committer / Sr. Enterprise Architect (RedHat) >>>> Twitter : @cmoulliard | Blog : http://cmoulliard.blogspot.com >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> rules-dev mailing listrules-dev@lists.jboss.orghttps://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> rules-dev mailing list >>>> rules-dev(a)lists.jboss.org >>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev >>>> >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Charles Moulliard >>> Apache Committer / Sr. Enterprise Architect (RedHat) >>> Twitter : @cmoulliard | Blog : http://cmoulliard.blogspot.com >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> rules-dev mailing list >>> rules-dev(a)lists.jboss.org >>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev >>> >> >> >> >> -- >> "Tudo vale a pena se a alma não é pequena..." >> >> _______________________________________________ >> rules-dev mailing list >> rules-dev(a)lists.jboss.org >> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev >> > > > > -- > Charles Moulliard > Apache Committer / Sr. Enterprise Architect (RedHat) > Twitter : @cmoulliard | Blog : http://cmoulliard.blogspot.com > > > _______________________________________________ > rules-dev mailing list > rules-dev(a)lists.jboss.org > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev > -- "Tudo vale a pena se a alma não é pequena..." _______________________________________________ rules-dev mailing list rules-dev(a)lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev

2013/3/27 Charles Moulliard <ch007m(a)gmail.com&gt; > 1) For Karaf project, we mostly use activator or Aries Blueprint ( > http://aries.apache.org/modules/blueprint.html). Declarative Service is > rather new top of karaf ( > http://sully6768.blogspot.be/2012/09/scr-components-with-karaf.html) > As a consumer you can still using both blueprint or BundleContext.getService() to reference the services. What I found good in both Blueprint and DS is that they ensure the component/services lifecycle and we could still use Configuration Admin with them. The problem with blueprint is that is not default installed in most distributions while DS is. Is DS installed by default in Karaf? > > 2) For poi-ooxml, we should use the ServiceMix bundle ( > http://repo1.maven.org/maven2/org/apache/servicemix/bundles/org.apache.se...) > until they provide a OSGI bundle of POI. > Unfortunately this bundle don't export the package needed. it wraps the poi.jar but not poi-ooxml. org.apache.poi.ss.usermodel.Workbook.class :( > > > On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 1:53 PM, Cristiano Gavião <cvgaviao(a)gmail.com&gt;wrote: > >> I won't change that code for while... It is still be there until you >> decide to move it to the new one. ;) >> >> Btw, I have two questions: >> >> 1)what do you think about to use Declarative Services to register the >> services instead do it manually at activator ? >> >> 2) how are you dealing with poi-ooxml dependency in >> drools-decisiontables? there is no osgified jar for it... >> >> >> >> 2013/3/27 Charles Moulliard <ch007m(a)gmail.com&gt; >> >>> Hi Christiano, >>> >>> I prefer that first we finalize the OSGI bundles >>> (drools-decisiontables, drools-jpa, drools-jbpm, ...) before changing >>> pax-exam code which is working and also used by Apache Camel/Karaf projects >>> ;-) >>> >>> Regards, >>> >>> Charles >>> >>> >>> On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 1:44 PM, Cristiano Gavião <cvgaviao(a)gmail.com&gt;wrote: >>> >>>> Hello, >>>> >>>> I already look at it. The problem is that this tests are using an old >>>> version (2.x) of pax-exam and using a karaf specific api too. >>>> That version will be dropped by karaf team soon. see [1] and [2]. >>>> >>>> Btw, Pax-exam was improved a lot in version 3.x. >>>> >>>> [1] - >>>> http://karaf.922171.n3.nabble.com/Discuss-Karaf-and-Pax-Exam-3-x-td402807... >>>> [2] - https://ops4j1.jira.com/browse/PAXEXAM-503 >>>> >>>> regards, >>>> >>>> Cristiano >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> 2013/3/27 Charles Moulliard <ch007m(a)gmail.com&gt; >>>> >>>>> Christiano, >>>>> >>>>> Can you please have a look here as there is already a pax-exam test >>>>> for karaf ( >>>>> https://github.com/droolsjbpm/droolsjbpm-integration/tree/master/drools-o...) >>>>> ? >>>>> >>>>> Regards, >>>>> >>>>> Charles >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On Tue, Mar 26, 2013 at 11:11 AM, Cristiano Gavião < >>>>> cvgaviao(a)gmail.com&gt; wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> I'm creating a pax-exam project where I will run some test on top >>>>>> of equinox and felix. >>>>>> >>>>>> After I commit and push it maybe you could add karaf stuffs. so it >>>>>> could help us to identify the reason of the error you are talking about... >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> On 25/03/13 14:19, Charles Moulliard wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> There was another error when using singleton := true. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> On Mon, Mar 25, 2013 at 6:15 PM, Cristiano Gavião < >>>>>> cvgaviao(a)gmail.com&gt; wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> well, I never seen any error related to singleton attribute at >>>>>>> Felix or Equinox. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> The error you have reported seems to be related to what is being >>>>>>> done (and not being undone) inside the activator... >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> 2013/3/25 Charles Moulliard <ch007m(a)gmail.com&gt; >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Not at all but using singleton := true option generates error when >>>>>>>> we do a stop, update start on Apache Karaf. >>>>>>>> We never used that property to generate all the bundles that we >>>>>>>> have in the project Karaf, ServiceMix, Geronimo, ... >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On Mon, Mar 25, 2013 at 4:34 PM, Cristiano Gavião < >>>>>>>> cvgaviao(a)gmail.com&gt; wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Charles, >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> I saw that you removed singleton:=true in your commit. This is >>>>>>>>> because do you plan to have more than one version of drools/jbpm running at >>>>>>>>> same time? >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> regards, >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Cristiano >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> 2013/3/25 Cristiano Gavião <cvgaviao(a)gmail.com&gt; >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Charles, >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> I already changed the manifest generation of kie and other >>>>>>>>>> drools modules. I created some pull requests for such changes. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Next thing that I planned to do this week(Wed) was to review >>>>>>>>>> each Activator, I think we could improve it... >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> regards, >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Cristiano >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> On 25/03/13 04:52, Charles Moulliard wrote: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Hi, >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> The org.kie.api.osgi.Activator class of kie project needs the >>>>>>>>>> class ServiceRegistryImpl (& Interface ServiceRegistry of kie internal) to >>>>>>>>>> register an OSGI Service (Interface) >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> this.serviceRegistry = bc.registerService( >>>>>>>>>> ServiceRegistry.class.getName(), >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> ServiceRegistryImpl.getInstance(), >>>>>>>>>> new >>>>>>>>>> Hashtable() ); >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> but the maven module kie api does not have a dependency with >>>>>>>>>> kie internal as the class ServiceRegistry & ServiceRegistryImpl are part >>>>>>>>>> of the module kie internal & package org.kie.internal.utils >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Questions : >>>>>>>>>> - What are the plans regarding to the Activator of Kie api >>>>>>>>>> bundle - what does it want to do ? >>>>>>>>>> - Can we add the missing dependency in kie api project ? >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Regards, >>>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>>> Charles Moulliard >>>>>>>>>> Apache Committer / Sr. Enterprise Architect (RedHat) >>>>>>>>>> Twitter : @cmoulliard | Blog : http://cmoulliard.blogspot.com >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>>>>>> rules-dev mailing listrules-dev@lists.jboss.orghttps://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>> "Tudo vale a pena se a alma não é pequena..." >>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>>>>> rules-dev mailing list >>>>>>>>> rules-dev(a)lists.jboss.org >>>>>>>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>> Charles Moulliard >>>>>>>> Apache Committer / Sr. Enterprise Architect (RedHat) >>>>>>>> Twitter : @cmoulliard | Blog : http://cmoulliard.blogspot.com >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>>>> rules-dev mailing list >>>>>>>> rules-dev(a)lists.jboss.org >>>>>>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>>> rules-dev mailing list >>>>>>> rules-dev(a)lists.jboss.org >>>>>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> -- >>>>>> Charles Moulliard >>>>>> Apache Committer / Sr. Enterprise Architect (RedHat) >>>>>> Twitter : @cmoulliard | Blog : http://cmoulliard.blogspot.com >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>> rules-dev mailing listrules-dev@lists.jboss.orghttps://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>> rules-dev mailing list >>>>>> rules-dev(a)lists.jboss.org >>>>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> Charles Moulliard >>>>> Apache Committer / Sr. Enterprise Architect (RedHat) >>>>> Twitter : @cmoulliard | Blog : http://cmoulliard.blogspot.com >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>> rules-dev mailing list >>>>> rules-dev(a)lists.jboss.org >>>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> "Tudo vale a pena se a alma não é pequena..." >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> rules-dev mailing list >>>> rules-dev(a)lists.jboss.org >>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev >>>> >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Charles Moulliard >>> Apache Committer / Sr. Enterprise Architect (RedHat) >>> Twitter : @cmoulliard | Blog : http://cmoulliard.blogspot.com >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> rules-dev mailing list >>> rules-dev(a)lists.jboss.org >>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev >>> >> >> >> >> -- >> "Tudo vale a pena se a alma não é pequena..." >> >> _______________________________________________ >> rules-dev mailing list >> rules-dev(a)lists.jboss.org >> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev >> > > > > -- > Charles Moulliard > Apache Committer / Sr. Enterprise Architect (RedHat) > Twitter : @cmoulliard | Blog : http://cmoulliard.blogspot.com > > > _______________________________________________ > rules-dev mailing list > rules-dev(a)lists.jboss.org > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev > -- "Tudo vale a pena se a alma não é pequena..." _______________________________________________ rules-dev mailing list rules-dev(a)lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev

2013/3/27 Charles Moulliard <ch007m(a)gmail.com&gt; > 1) For Karaf project, we mostly use activator or Aries Blueprint ( > http://aries.apache.org/modules/blueprint.html). Declarative Service is > rather new top of karaf ( > http://sully6768.blogspot.be/2012/09/scr-components-with-karaf.html) > As a consumer you can still using both blueprint or BundleContext.getService() to reference the services. What I found good in both Blueprint and DS is that they ensure the component/services lifecycle and we could still use Configuration Admin with them. The problem with blueprint is that is not default installed in most distributions while DS is. Is DS installed by default in Karaf? > > 2) For poi-ooxml, we should use the ServiceMix bundle ( > http://repo1.maven.org/maven2/org/apache/servicemix/bundles/org.apache.se...) > until they provide a OSGI bundle of POI. > Unfortunately this bundle don't export the package needed. it wraps the poi.jar but not poi-ooxml. org.apache.poi.ss.usermodel.Workbook.class :( > > > On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 1:53 PM, Cristiano Gavião <cvgaviao(a)gmail.com&gt;wrote: > >> I won't change that code for while... It is still be there until you >> decide to move it to the new one. ;) >> >> Btw, I have two questions: >> >> 1)what do you think about to use Declarative Services to register the >> services instead do it manually at activator ? >> >> 2) how are you dealing with poi-ooxml dependency in >> drools-decisiontables? there is no osgified jar for it... >> >> >> >> 2013/3/27 Charles Moulliard <ch007m(a)gmail.com&gt; >> >>> Hi Christiano, >>> >>> I prefer that first we finalize the OSGI bundles >>> (drools-decisiontables, drools-jpa, drools-jbpm, ...) before changing >>> pax-exam code which is working and also used by Apache Camel/Karaf projects >>> ;-) >>> >>> Regards, >>> >>> Charles >>> >>> >>> On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 1:44 PM, Cristiano Gavião <cvgaviao(a)gmail.com&gt;wrote: >>> >>>> Hello, >>>> >>>> I already look at it. The problem is that this tests are using an old >>>> version (2.x) of pax-exam and using a karaf specific api too. >>>> That version will be dropped by karaf team soon. see [1] and [2]. >>>> >>>> Btw, Pax-exam was improved a lot in version 3.x. >>>> >>>> [1] - >>>> http://karaf.922171.n3.nabble.com/Discuss-Karaf-and-Pax-Exam-3-x-td402807... >>>> [2] - https://ops4j1.jira.com/browse/PAXEXAM-503 >>>> >>>> regards, >>>> >>>> Cristiano >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> 2013/3/27 Charles Moulliard <ch007m(a)gmail.com&gt; >>>> >>>>> Christiano, >>>>> >>>>> Can you please have a look here as there is already a pax-exam test >>>>> for karaf ( >>>>> https://github.com/droolsjbpm/droolsjbpm-integration/tree/master/drools-o...) >>>>> ? >>>>> >>>>> Regards, >>>>> >>>>> Charles >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On Tue, Mar 26, 2013 at 11:11 AM, Cristiano Gavião < >>>>> cvgaviao(a)gmail.com&gt; wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> I'm creating a pax-exam project where I will run some test on top >>>>>> of equinox and felix. >>>>>> >>>>>> After I commit and push it maybe you could add karaf stuffs. so it >>>>>> could help us to identify the reason of the error you are talking about... >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> On 25/03/13 14:19, Charles Moulliard wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> There was another error when using singleton := true. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> On Mon, Mar 25, 2013 at 6:15 PM, Cristiano Gavião < >>>>>> cvgaviao(a)gmail.com&gt; wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> well, I never seen any error related to singleton attribute at >>>>>>> Felix or Equinox. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> The error you have reported seems to be related to what is being >>>>>>> done (and not being undone) inside the activator... >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> 2013/3/25 Charles Moulliard <ch007m(a)gmail.com&gt; >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Not at all but using singleton := true option generates error when >>>>>>>> we do a stop, update start on Apache Karaf. >>>>>>>> We never used that property to generate all the bundles that we >>>>>>>> have in the project Karaf, ServiceMix, Geronimo, ... >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On Mon, Mar 25, 2013 at 4:34 PM, Cristiano Gavião < >>>>>>>> cvgaviao(a)gmail.com&gt; wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Charles, >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> I saw that you removed singleton:=true in your commit. This is >>>>>>>>> because do you plan to have more than one version of drools/jbpm running at >>>>>>>>> same time? >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> regards, >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Cristiano >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> 2013/3/25 Cristiano Gavião <cvgaviao(a)gmail.com&gt; >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Charles, >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> I already changed the manifest generation of kie and other >>>>>>>>>> drools modules. I created some pull requests for such changes. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Next thing that I planned to do this week(Wed) was to review >>>>>>>>>> each Activator, I think we could improve it... >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> regards, >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Cristiano >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> On 25/03/13 04:52, Charles Moulliard wrote: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Hi, >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> The org.kie.api.osgi.Activator class of kie project needs the >>>>>>>>>> class ServiceRegistryImpl (& Interface ServiceRegistry of kie internal) to >>>>>>>>>> register an OSGI Service (Interface) >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> this.serviceRegistry = bc.registerService( >>>>>>>>>> ServiceRegistry.class.getName(), >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> ServiceRegistryImpl.getInstance(), >>>>>>>>>> new >>>>>>>>>> Hashtable() ); >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> but the maven module kie api does not have a dependency with >>>>>>>>>> kie internal as the class ServiceRegistry & ServiceRegistryImpl are part >>>>>>>>>> of the module kie internal & package org.kie.internal.utils >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Questions : >>>>>>>>>> - What are the plans regarding to the Activator of Kie api >>>>>>>>>> bundle - what does it want to do ? >>>>>>>>>> - Can we add the missing dependency in kie api project ? >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Regards, >>>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>>> Charles Moulliard >>>>>>>>>> Apache Committer / Sr. Enterprise Architect (RedHat) >>>>>>>>>> Twitter : @cmoulliard | Blog : http://cmoulliard.blogspot.com >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>>>>>> rules-dev mailing listrules-dev@lists.jboss.orghttps://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>> "Tudo vale a pena se a alma não é pequena..." >>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>>>>> rules-dev mailing list >>>>>>>>> rules-dev(a)lists.jboss.org >>>>>>>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>> Charles Moulliard >>>>>>>> Apache Committer / Sr. Enterprise Architect (RedHat) >>>>>>>> Twitter : @cmoulliard | Blog : http://cmoulliard.blogspot.com >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>>>> rules-dev mailing list >>>>>>>> rules-dev(a)lists.jboss.org >>>>>>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>>> rules-dev mailing list >>>>>>> rules-dev(a)lists.jboss.org >>>>>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> -- >>>>>> Charles Moulliard >>>>>> Apache Committer / Sr. Enterprise Architect (RedHat) >>>>>> Twitter : @cmoulliard | Blog : http://cmoulliard.blogspot.com >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>> rules-dev mailing listrules-dev@lists.jboss.orghttps://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>> rules-dev mailing list >>>>>> rules-dev(a)lists.jboss.org >>>>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> Charles Moulliard >>>>> Apache Committer / Sr. Enterprise Architect (RedHat) >>>>> Twitter : @cmoulliard | Blog : http://cmoulliard.blogspot.com >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>> rules-dev mailing list >>>>> rules-dev(a)lists.jboss.org >>>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> "Tudo vale a pena se a alma não é pequena..." >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> rules-dev mailing list >>>> rules-dev(a)lists.jboss.org >>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev >>>> >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Charles Moulliard >>> Apache Committer / Sr. Enterprise Architect (RedHat) >>> Twitter : @cmoulliard | Blog : http://cmoulliard.blogspot.com >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> rules-dev mailing list >>> rules-dev(a)lists.jboss.org >>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev >>> >> >> >> >> -- >> "Tudo vale a pena se a alma não é pequena..." >> >> _______________________________________________ >> rules-dev mailing list >> rules-dev(a)lists.jboss.org >> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev >> > > > > -- > Charles Moulliard > Apache Committer / Sr. Enterprise Architect (RedHat) > Twitter : @cmoulliard | Blog : http://cmoulliard.blogspot.com > > > _______________________________________________ > rules-dev mailing list > rules-dev(a)lists.jboss.org > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev > -- "Tudo vale a pena se a alma não é pequena..." _______________________________________________ rules-dev mailing list rules-dev(a)lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev

The packages that I'm aware of until now is: - org.apache.poi.openxml4j.exceptions - org.apache.poi.ss.usermodel (note that poi.jar exports this too) I'm getting another problem with servicemix bundles related to com.sun.tools.xjc. it seems that there is no bundle exporting com.sun.source.tree that is being required: ERROR: Bundle org.drools.decisiontables [38] Error starting mvn:org.drools/drools-decisiontables/6.0.0-SNAPSHOT (org.osgi.framework.BundleException: Unresolved constraint in bundle org.drools.decisiontables [38]: Unable to resolve 38.0: missing requirement [38.0] osgi.wiring.package; (osgi.wiring.package=org.drools.compiler.compiler) [caused by: Unable to resolve 29.0: missing requirement [29.0] osgi.wiring.package; (osgi.wiring.package=org.drools.core) [caused by: Unable to resolve 30.0: missing requirement [30.0] osgi.wiring.package; (osgi.wiring.package=com.sun.tools.xjc) [caused by: Unable to resolve 32.0: missing requirement [32.0] osgi.wiring.package; (osgi.wiring.package=com.sun.source.tree)]]]) org.osgi.framework.BundleException: Unresolved constraint in bundle org.drools.decisiontables [38]: Unable to resolve 38.0: missing requirement [38.0] osgi.wiring.package; (osgi.wiring.package=org.drools.compiler.compiler) [caused by: Unable to resolve 29.0: missing requirement [29.0] osgi.wiring.package; (osgi.wiring.package=org.drools.core) [caused by: Unable to resolve 30.0: missing requirement [30.0] osgi.wiring.package; (osgi.wiring.package=com.sun.tools.xjc) [caused by: Unable to resolve 32.0: missing requirement [32.0] osgi.wiring.package; (osgi.wiring.package=com.sun.source.tree)]]] I'm using this deps: <dependency> <groupId>org.apache.servicemix.bundles</groupId> <artifactId>org.apache.servicemix.bundles.jaxb-xjc</artifactId> <version>2.2.6_1</version> </dependency> <dependency> <groupId>org.apache.servicemix.bundles</groupId> <artifactId>org.apache.servicemix.bundles.jaxb-impl</artifactId> <version>2.2.6_1</version> </dependency> <dependency> <groupId>org.apache.servicemix.specs</groupId> <artifactId>org.apache.servicemix.specs.jaxb-api-2.2</artifactId> <version>2.2.0</version> </dependency> <dependency> <groupId>org.apache.servicemix.specs</groupId> <artifactId>org.apache.servicemix.specs.activation-api-1.1</artifactId> <version>2.2.0</version> </dependency> <dependency> <groupId>org.apache.servicemix.specs</groupId> <artifactId>org.apache.servicemix.specs.stax-api-1.2</artifactId> <version>2.2.0</version> </dependency> 2013/3/27 Charles Moulliard <ch007m(a)gmail.com&gt; > Can you please provide me the list of packages to be exported and I will > include also poi-ooxml ? > > > On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 3:03 PM, Cristiano Gavião <cvgaviao(a)gmail.com&gt;wrote: > >> >> >> 2013/3/27 Charles Moulliard <ch007m(a)gmail.com&gt; >> >>> 1) For Karaf project, we mostly use activator or Aries Blueprint ( >>> http://aries.apache.org/modules/blueprint.html). Declarative Service >>> is rather new top of karaf ( >>> http://sully6768.blogspot.be/2012/09/scr-components-with-karaf.html) >>> >> >> As a consumer you can still using both blueprint or BundleContext.getService() >> to reference the services. >> >> What I found good in both Blueprint and DS is that they ensure the >> component/services lifecycle and we could still use Configuration Admin >> with them. >> >> The problem with blueprint is that is not default installed in most >> distributions while DS is. >> Is DS installed by default in Karaf? >> >> >>> >>> 2) For poi-ooxml, we should use the ServiceMix bundle ( >>> http://repo1.maven.org/maven2/org/apache/servicemix/bundles/org.apache.se...) >>> until they provide a OSGI bundle of POI. >>> >> >> Unfortunately this bundle don't export the package needed. it wraps the >> poi.jar but not poi-ooxml. org.apache.poi.ss.usermodel.Workbook.class :( >> >> >>> >>> >>> On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 1:53 PM, Cristiano Gavião <cvgaviao(a)gmail.com&gt;wrote: >>> >>>> I won't change that code for while... It is still be there until you >>>> decide to move it to the new one. ;) >>>> >>>> Btw, I have two questions: >>>> >>>> 1)what do you think about to use Declarative Services to register the >>>> services instead do it manually at activator ? >>>> >>>> 2) how are you dealing with poi-ooxml dependency in >>>> drools-decisiontables? there is no osgified jar for it... >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> 2013/3/27 Charles Moulliard <ch007m(a)gmail.com&gt; >>>> >>>>> Hi Christiano, >>>>> >>>>> I prefer that first we finalize the OSGI bundles >>>>> (drools-decisiontables, drools-jpa, drools-jbpm, ...) before changing >>>>> pax-exam code which is working and also used by Apache Camel/Karaf projects >>>>> ;-) >>>>> >>>>> Regards, >>>>> >>>>> Charles >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 1:44 PM, Cristiano Gavião <cvgaviao(a)gmail.com >>>>> > wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Hello, >>>>>> >>>>>> I already look at it. The problem is that this tests are using an >>>>>> old version (2.x) of pax-exam and using a karaf specific api too. >>>>>> That version will be dropped by karaf team soon. see [1] and [2]. >>>>>> >>>>>> Btw, Pax-exam was improved a lot in version 3.x. >>>>>> >>>>>> [1] - >>>>>> http://karaf.922171.n3.nabble.com/Discuss-Karaf-and-Pax-Exam-3-x-td402807... >>>>>> [2] - https://ops4j1.jira.com/browse/PAXEXAM-503 >>>>>> >>>>>> regards, >>>>>> >>>>>> Cristiano >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> 2013/3/27 Charles Moulliard <ch007m(a)gmail.com&gt; >>>>>> >>>>>>> Christiano, >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Can you please have a look here as there is already a pax-exam test >>>>>>> for karaf ( >>>>>>> https://github.com/droolsjbpm/droolsjbpm-integration/tree/master/drools-o...) >>>>>>> ? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Regards, >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Charles >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Tue, Mar 26, 2013 at 11:11 AM, Cristiano Gavião < >>>>>>> cvgaviao(a)gmail.com&gt; wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> I'm creating a pax-exam project where I will run some test on >>>>>>>> top of equinox and felix. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> After I commit and push it maybe you could add karaf stuffs. so it >>>>>>>> could help us to identify the reason of the error you are talking about... >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On 25/03/13 14:19, Charles Moulliard wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> There was another error when using singleton := true. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On Mon, Mar 25, 2013 at 6:15 PM, Cristiano Gavião < >>>>>>>> cvgaviao(a)gmail.com&gt; wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> well, I never seen any error related to singleton attribute at >>>>>>>>> Felix or Equinox. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> The error you have reported seems to be related to what is being >>>>>>>>> done (and not being undone) inside the activator... >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> 2013/3/25 Charles Moulliard <ch007m(a)gmail.com&gt; >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Not at all but using singleton := true option generates error >>>>>>>>>> when we do a stop, update start on Apache Karaf. >>>>>>>>>> We never used that property to generate all the bundles that we >>>>>>>>>> have in the project Karaf, ServiceMix, Geronimo, ... >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> On Mon, Mar 25, 2013 at 4:34 PM, Cristiano Gavião < >>>>>>>>>> cvgaviao(a)gmail.com&gt; wrote: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Charles, >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> I saw that you removed singleton:=true in your commit. This is >>>>>>>>>>> because do you plan to have more than one version of drools/jbpm running at >>>>>>>>>>> same time? >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> regards, >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Cristiano >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> 2013/3/25 Cristiano Gavião <cvgaviao(a)gmail.com&gt; >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Charles, >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> I already changed the manifest generation of kie and other >>>>>>>>>>>> drools modules. I created some pull requests for such changes. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Next thing that I planned to do this week(Wed) was to review >>>>>>>>>>>> each Activator, I think we could improve it... >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> regards, >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Cristiano >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> On 25/03/13 04:52, Charles Moulliard wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Hi, >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> The org.kie.api.osgi.Activator class of kie project needs >>>>>>>>>>>> the class ServiceRegistryImpl (& Interface ServiceRegistry of kie internal) >>>>>>>>>>>> to register an OSGI Service (Interface) >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> this.serviceRegistry = bc.registerService( >>>>>>>>>>>> ServiceRegistry.class.getName(), >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> ServiceRegistryImpl.getInstance(), >>>>>>>>>>>> new >>>>>>>>>>>> Hashtable() ); >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> but the maven module kie api does not have a dependency with >>>>>>>>>>>> kie internal as the class ServiceRegistry & ServiceRegistryImpl are part >>>>>>>>>>>> of the module kie internal & package org.kie.internal.utils >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Questions : >>>>>>>>>>>> - What are the plans regarding to the Activator of Kie api >>>>>>>>>>>> bundle - what does it want to do ? >>>>>>>>>>>> - Can we add the missing dependency in kie api project ? >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Regards, >>>>>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>>>>> Charles Moulliard >>>>>>>>>>>> Apache Committer / Sr. Enterprise Architect (RedHat) >>>>>>>>>>>> Twitter : @cmoulliard | Blog : http://cmoulliard.blogspot.com >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>>>>>>>> rules-dev mailing listrules-dev@lists.jboss.orghttps://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>>>> "Tudo vale a pena se a alma não é pequena..." >>>>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>>>>>>> rules-dev mailing list >>>>>>>>>>> rules-dev(a)lists.jboss.org >>>>>>>>>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>>> Charles Moulliard >>>>>>>>>> Apache Committer / Sr. Enterprise Architect (RedHat) >>>>>>>>>> Twitter : @cmoulliard | Blog : http://cmoulliard.blogspot.com >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>>>>>> rules-dev mailing list >>>>>>>>>> rules-dev(a)lists.jboss.org >>>>>>>>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>>>>> rules-dev mailing list >>>>>>>>> rules-dev(a)lists.jboss.org >>>>>>>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>> Charles Moulliard >>>>>>>> Apache Committer / Sr. Enterprise Architect (RedHat) >>>>>>>> Twitter : @cmoulliard | Blog : http://cmoulliard.blogspot.com >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>>>> rules-dev mailing listrules-dev@lists.jboss.orghttps://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>>>> rules-dev mailing list >>>>>>>> rules-dev(a)lists.jboss.org >>>>>>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> -- >>>>>>> Charles Moulliard >>>>>>> Apache Committer / Sr. Enterprise Architect (RedHat) >>>>>>> Twitter : @cmoulliard | Blog : http://cmoulliard.blogspot.com >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>>> rules-dev mailing list >>>>>>> rules-dev(a)lists.jboss.org >>>>>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> -- >>>>>> "Tudo vale a pena se a alma não é pequena..." >>>>>> >>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>> rules-dev mailing list >>>>>> rules-dev(a)lists.jboss.org >>>>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> Charles Moulliard >>>>> Apache Committer / Sr. Enterprise Architect (RedHat) >>>>> Twitter : @cmoulliard | Blog : http://cmoulliard.blogspot.com >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>> rules-dev mailing list >>>>> rules-dev(a)lists.jboss.org >>>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> "Tudo vale a pena se a alma não é pequena..." >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> rules-dev mailing list >>>> rules-dev(a)lists.jboss.org >>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev >>>> >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Charles Moulliard >>> Apache Committer / Sr. Enterprise Architect (RedHat) >>> Twitter : @cmoulliard | Blog : http://cmoulliard.blogspot.com >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> rules-dev mailing list >>> rules-dev(a)lists.jboss.org >>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev >>> >> >> >> >> -- >> "Tudo vale a pena se a alma não é pequena..." >> >> _______________________________________________ >> rules-dev mailing list >> rules-dev(a)lists.jboss.org >> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev >> > > > > -- > Charles Moulliard > Apache Committer / Sr. Enterprise Architect (RedHat) > Twitter : @cmoulliard | Blog : http://cmoulliard.blogspot.com > > > _______________________________________________ > rules-dev mailing list > rules-dev(a)lists.jboss.org > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev > -- "Tudo vale a pena se a alma não é pequena..." _______________________________________________ rules-dev mailing list rules-dev(a)lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev

Hi Charles, Step one (installation of bundles and its dependencies) seems to be ok ;) [INFO] drools-osgi-enviroment-tests ...................... SUCCESS [6.559s] [INFO] drools-osgi-enviroment-tests-common ............... SUCCESS [15.887s] [INFO] drools-osgi-enviroment-tests-equinox-juno ......... SUCCESS [20.176s] [INFO] drools-osgi-enviroment-tests-equinox-kepler ....... SUCCESS [17.581s] [INFO] drools-osgi-enviroment-tests-felix ................ SUCCESS [15.874s] [INFO] drools-osgi-enviroment-tests-jbosgi ............... SUCCESS [39.769s] [INFO] drools-osgi-enviroment-tests-knoplerfish .......... SUCCESS [14.839s] [INFO] ------------------------------------------------------------------------ next step is to reuse the existent tests-jars cheers, Cristiano 2013/3/27 Charles Moulliard <ch007m(a)gmail.com&gt; > I think that those packages have been added since JDK 1.7 xxx. Reason why > you should deploy the following bundles : > > > https://github.com/droolsjbpm/droolsjbpm-integration/blob/master/drools-o... > > with these versions > > > https://github.com/droolsjbpm/droolsjbpm-integration/blob/master/drools-o... > > > and more specifically 2.2.1 for jaxb-x > > > On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 4:32 PM, Cristiano Gavião <cvgaviao(a)gmail.com&gt;wrote: > >> The packages that I'm aware of until now is: >> - org.apache.poi.openxml4j.exceptions >> - org.apache.poi.ss.usermodel (note that poi.jar exports this too) >> >> I'm getting another problem with servicemix bundles related to >> com.sun.tools.xjc. it seems that there is no bundle exporting >> com.sun.source.tree that is being required: >> >> ERROR: Bundle org.drools.decisiontables [38] Error starting >> mvn:org.drools/drools-decisiontables/6.0.0-SNAPSHOT >> (org.osgi.framework.BundleException: Unresolved constraint in bundle >> org.drools.decisiontables [38]: Unable to resolve 38.0: missing requirement >> [38.0] osgi.wiring.package; >> (osgi.wiring.package=org.drools.compiler.compiler) [caused by: Unable to >> resolve 29.0: missing requirement [29.0] osgi.wiring.package; >> (osgi.wiring.package=org.drools.core) [caused by: Unable to resolve 30.0: >> missing requirement [30.0] osgi.wiring.package; >> (osgi.wiring.package=com.sun.tools.xjc) [caused by: Unable to resolve 32.0: >> missing requirement [32.0] osgi.wiring.package; >> (osgi.wiring.package=com.sun.source.tree)]]]) >> org.osgi.framework.BundleException: Unresolved constraint in bundle >> org.drools.decisiontables [38]: Unable to resolve 38.0: missing requirement >> [38.0] osgi.wiring.package; >> (osgi.wiring.package=org.drools.compiler.compiler) [caused by: Unable to >> resolve 29.0: missing requirement [29.0] osgi.wiring.package; >> (osgi.wiring.package=org.drools.core) [caused by: Unable to resolve 30.0: >> missing requirement [30.0] osgi.wiring.package; >> (osgi.wiring.package=com.sun.tools.xjc) [caused by: Unable to resolve 32.0: >> missing requirement [32.0] osgi.wiring.package; >> (osgi.wiring.package=com.sun.source.tree)]]] >> >> I'm using this deps: >> >> <dependency> >> <groupId>org.apache.servicemix.bundles</groupId> >> >> <artifactId>org.apache.servicemix.bundles.jaxb-xjc</artifactId> >> <version>2.2.6_1</version> >> </dependency> >> <dependency> >> <groupId>org.apache.servicemix.bundles</groupId> >> >> <artifactId>org.apache.servicemix.bundles.jaxb-impl</artifactId> >> <version>2.2.6_1</version> >> </dependency> >> <dependency> >> <groupId>org.apache.servicemix.specs</groupId> >> >> <artifactId>org.apache.servicemix.specs.jaxb-api-2.2</artifactId> >> <version>2.2.0</version> >> </dependency> >> <dependency> >> <groupId>org.apache.servicemix.specs</groupId> >> >> <artifactId>org.apache.servicemix.specs.activation-api-1.1</artifactId> >> <version>2.2.0</version> >> </dependency> >> <dependency> >> <groupId>org.apache.servicemix.specs</groupId> >> >> <artifactId>org.apache.servicemix.specs.stax-api-1.2</artifactId> >> <version>2.2.0</version> >> </dependency> >> >> >> 2013/3/27 Charles Moulliard <ch007m(a)gmail.com&gt; >> >>> Can you please provide me the list of packages to be exported and I >>> will include also poi-ooxml ? >>> >>> >>> On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 3:03 PM, Cristiano Gavião <cvgaviao(a)gmail.com&gt;wrote: >>> >>>> >>>> >>>> 2013/3/27 Charles Moulliard <ch007m(a)gmail.com&gt; >>>> >>>>> 1) For Karaf project, we mostly use activator or Aries Blueprint ( >>>>> http://aries.apache.org/modules/blueprint.html). Declarative Service >>>>> is rather new top of karaf ( >>>>> http://sully6768.blogspot.be/2012/09/scr-components-with-karaf.html) >>>>> >>>> >>>> As a consumer you can still using both blueprint or BundleContext.getService() >>>> to reference the services. >>>> >>>> What I found good in both Blueprint and DS is that they ensure the >>>> component/services lifecycle and we could still use Configuration Admin >>>> with them. >>>> >>>> The problem with blueprint is that is not default installed in most >>>> distributions while DS is. >>>> Is DS installed by default in Karaf? >>>> >>>> >>>>> >>>>> 2) For poi-ooxml, we should use the ServiceMix bundle ( >>>>> http://repo1.maven.org/maven2/org/apache/servicemix/bundles/org.apache.se...) >>>>> until they provide a OSGI bundle of POI. >>>>> >>>> >>>> Unfortunately this bundle don't export the package needed. it wraps >>>> the poi.jar but not poi-ooxml. org.apache.poi.ss.usermodel.Workbook.class :( >>>> >>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 1:53 PM, Cristiano Gavião <cvgaviao(a)gmail.com >>>>> > wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> I won't change that code for while... It is still be there until you >>>>>> decide to move it to the new one. ;) >>>>>> >>>>>> Btw, I have two questions: >>>>>> >>>>>> 1)what do you think about to use Declarative Services to register >>>>>> the services instead do it manually at activator ? >>>>>> >>>>>> 2) how are you dealing with poi-ooxml dependency in >>>>>> drools-decisiontables? there is no osgified jar for it... >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> 2013/3/27 Charles Moulliard <ch007m(a)gmail.com&gt; >>>>>> >>>>>>> Hi Christiano, >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I prefer that first we finalize the OSGI bundles >>>>>>> (drools-decisiontables, drools-jpa, drools-jbpm, ...) before changing >>>>>>> pax-exam code which is working and also used by Apache Camel/Karaf projects >>>>>>> ;-) >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Regards, >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Charles >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 1:44 PM, Cristiano Gavião < >>>>>>> cvgaviao(a)gmail.com&gt; wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Hello, >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> I already look at it. The problem is that this tests are using an >>>>>>>> old version (2.x) of pax-exam and using a karaf specific api too. >>>>>>>> That version will be dropped by karaf team soon. see [1] and [2]. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Btw, Pax-exam was improved a lot in version 3.x. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> [1] - >>>>>>>> http://karaf.922171.n3.nabble.com/Discuss-Karaf-and-Pax-Exam-3-x-td402807... >>>>>>>> [2] - https://ops4j1.jira.com/browse/PAXEXAM-503 >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> regards, >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Cristiano >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> 2013/3/27 Charles Moulliard <ch007m(a)gmail.com&gt; >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Christiano, >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Can you please have a look here as there is already a pax-exam >>>>>>>>> test for karaf ( >>>>>>>>> https://github.com/droolsjbpm/droolsjbpm-integration/tree/master/drools-o...) >>>>>>>>> ? >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Regards, >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Charles >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> On Tue, Mar 26, 2013 at 11:11 AM, Cristiano Gavião < >>>>>>>>> cvgaviao(a)gmail.com&gt; wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> I'm creating a pax-exam project where I will run some test on >>>>>>>>>> top of equinox and felix. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> After I commit and push it maybe you could add karaf stuffs. so >>>>>>>>>> it could help us to identify the reason of the error you are talking >>>>>>>>>> about... >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> On 25/03/13 14:19, Charles Moulliard wrote: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> There was another error when using singleton := true. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> On Mon, Mar 25, 2013 at 6:15 PM, Cristiano Gavião < >>>>>>>>>> cvgaviao(a)gmail.com&gt; wrote: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> well, I never seen any error related to singleton attribute at >>>>>>>>>>> Felix or Equinox. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> The error you have reported seems to be related to what is >>>>>>>>>>> being done (and not being undone) inside the activator... >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> 2013/3/25 Charles Moulliard <ch007m(a)gmail.com&gt; >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Not at all but using singleton := true option generates error >>>>>>>>>>>> when we do a stop, update start on Apache Karaf. >>>>>>>>>>>> We never used that property to generate all the bundles that >>>>>>>>>>>> we have in the project Karaf, ServiceMix, Geronimo, ... >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, Mar 25, 2013 at 4:34 PM, Cristiano Gavião < >>>>>>>>>>>> cvgaviao(a)gmail.com&gt; wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Charles, >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> I saw that you removed singleton:=true in your commit. This >>>>>>>>>>>>> is because do you plan to have more than one version of drools/jbpm running >>>>>>>>>>>>> at same time? >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> regards, >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Cristiano >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> 2013/3/25 Cristiano Gavião <cvgaviao(a)gmail.com&gt; >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Charles, >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> I already changed the manifest generation of kie and other >>>>>>>>>>>>>> drools modules. I created some pull requests for such changes. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Next thing that I planned to do this week(Wed) was to review >>>>>>>>>>>>>> each Activator, I think we could improve it... >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> regards, >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Cristiano >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 25/03/13 04:52, Charles Moulliard wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi, >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> The org.kie.api.osgi.Activator class of kie project needs >>>>>>>>>>>>>> the class ServiceRegistryImpl (& Interface ServiceRegistry of kie internal) >>>>>>>>>>>>>> to register an OSGI Service (Interface) >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> this.serviceRegistry = bc.registerService( >>>>>>>>>>>>>> ServiceRegistry.class.getName(), >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> ServiceRegistryImpl.getInstance(), >>>>>>>>>>>>>> new >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hashtable() ); >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> but the maven module kie api does not have a dependency >>>>>>>>>>>>>> with kie internal as the class ServiceRegistry & ServiceRegistryImpl are >>>>>>>>>>>>>> part of the module kie internal & package org.kie.internal.utils >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Questions : >>>>>>>>>>>>>> - What are the plans regarding to the Activator of Kie api >>>>>>>>>>>>>> bundle - what does it want to do ? >>>>>>>>>>>>>> - Can we add the missing dependency in kie api project ? >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Regards, >>>>>>>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Charles Moulliard >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Apache Committer / Sr. Enterprise Architect (RedHat) >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Twitter : @cmoulliard | Blog : >>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://cmoulliard.blogspot.com >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>>>>>>>>>> rules-dev mailing listrules-dev@lists.jboss.orghttps://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>>>>>> "Tudo vale a pena se a alma não é pequena..." >>>>>>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>>>>>>>>> rules-dev mailing list >>>>>>>>>>>>> rules-dev(a)lists.jboss.org >>>>>>>>>>>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>>>>> Charles Moulliard >>>>>>>>>>>> Apache Committer / Sr. Enterprise Architect (RedHat) >>>>>>>>>>>> Twitter : @cmoulliard | Blog : http://cmoulliard.blogspot.com >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>>>>>>>> rules-dev mailing list >>>>>>>>>>>> rules-dev(a)lists.jboss.org >>>>>>>>>>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>>>>>>> rules-dev mailing list >>>>>>>>>>> rules-dev(a)lists.jboss.org >>>>>>>>>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>>> Charles Moulliard >>>>>>>>>> Apache Committer / Sr. Enterprise Architect (RedHat) >>>>>>>>>> Twitter : @cmoulliard | Blog : http://cmoulliard.blogspot.com >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>>>>>> rules-dev mailing listrules-dev@lists.jboss.orghttps://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>>>>>> rules-dev mailing list >>>>>>>>>> rules-dev(a)lists.jboss.org >>>>>>>>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>> Charles Moulliard >>>>>>>>> Apache Committer / Sr. Enterprise Architect (RedHat) >>>>>>>>> Twitter : @cmoulliard | Blog : http://cmoulliard.blogspot.com >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>>>>> rules-dev mailing list >>>>>>>>> rules-dev(a)lists.jboss.org >>>>>>>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>> "Tudo vale a pena se a alma não é pequena..." >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>>>> rules-dev mailing list >>>>>>>> rules-dev(a)lists.jboss.org >>>>>>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> -- >>>>>>> Charles Moulliard >>>>>>> Apache Committer / Sr. Enterprise Architect (RedHat) >>>>>>> Twitter : @cmoulliard | Blog : http://cmoulliard.blogspot.com >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>>> rules-dev mailing list >>>>>>> rules-dev(a)lists.jboss.org >>>>>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> -- >>>>>> "Tudo vale a pena se a alma não é pequena..." >>>>>> >>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>> rules-dev mailing list >>>>>> rules-dev(a)lists.jboss.org >>>>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> Charles Moulliard >>>>> Apache Committer / Sr. Enterprise Architect (RedHat) >>>>> Twitter : @cmoulliard | Blog : http://cmoulliard.blogspot.com >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>> rules-dev mailing list >>>>> rules-dev(a)lists.jboss.org >>>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> "Tudo vale a pena se a alma não é pequena..." >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> rules-dev mailing list >>>> rules-dev(a)lists.jboss.org >>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev >>>> >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Charles Moulliard >>> Apache Committer / Sr. Enterprise Architect (RedHat) >>> Twitter : @cmoulliard | Blog : http://cmoulliard.blogspot.com >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> rules-dev mailing list >>> rules-dev(a)lists.jboss.org >>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev >>> >> >> >> >> -- >> "Tudo vale a pena se a alma não é pequena..." >> >> _______________________________________________ >> rules-dev mailing list >> rules-dev(a)lists.jboss.org >> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev >> > > > > -- > Charles Moulliard > Apache Committer / Sr. Enterprise Architect (RedHat) > Twitter : @cmoulliard | Blog : http://cmoulliard.blogspot.com > > > _______________________________________________ > rules-dev mailing list > rules-dev(a)lists.jboss.org > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev > -- "Tudo vale a pena se a alma não é pequena..." _______________________________________________ rules-dev mailing list rules-dev(a)lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev

There is nevertheless one advantage of Aries Blueprint over Declarative Service which is : "Unlike Declarative Services, Blueprint can inject not only OSGi services, but also managed beans, i.e. plain old Java objects. Managed beans are local to the current component and cannot be injected into other components. Each Blueprint-enabled bundle has its own Blueprint context with managed beans and OSGi service references. The contexts of different bundles can interact by injecting services published by another bundle." On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 8:26 PM, Charles Moulliard <ch007m(a)gmail.com&gt;wrote: > Great ! > > > On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 7:04 PM, Cristiano Gavião <cvgaviao(a)gmail.com&gt;wrote: > >> Hi Charles, >> >> Step one (installation of bundles and its dependencies) seems to be ok >> ;) >> >> [INFO] drools-osgi-enviroment-tests ...................... SUCCESS >> [6.559s] >> [INFO] drools-osgi-enviroment-tests-common ............... SUCCESS >> [15.887s] >> [INFO] drools-osgi-enviroment-tests-equinox-juno ......... SUCCESS >> [20.176s] >> [INFO] drools-osgi-enviroment-tests-equinox-kepler ....... SUCCESS >> [17.581s] >> [INFO] drools-osgi-enviroment-tests-felix ................ SUCCESS >> [15.874s] >> [INFO] drools-osgi-enviroment-tests-jbosgi ............... SUCCESS >> [39.769s] >> [INFO] drools-osgi-enviroment-tests-knoplerfish .......... SUCCESS >> [14.839s] >> [INFO] >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> >> next step is to reuse the existent tests-jars >> >> cheers, >> >> >> Cristiano >> >> >> >> 2013/3/27 Charles Moulliard <ch007m(a)gmail.com&gt; >> >>> I think that those packages have been added since JDK 1.7 xxx. Reason >>> why you should deploy the following bundles : >>> >>> >>> https://github.com/droolsjbpm/droolsjbpm-integration/blob/master/drools-o... >>> >>> with these versions >>> >>> >>> https://github.com/droolsjbpm/droolsjbpm-integration/blob/master/drools-o... >>> >>> >>> and more specifically 2.2.1 for jaxb-x >>> >>> >>> On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 4:32 PM, Cristiano Gavião <cvgaviao(a)gmail.com&gt;wrote: >>> >>>> The packages that I'm aware of until now is: >>>> - org.apache.poi.openxml4j.exceptions >>>> - org.apache.poi.ss.usermodel (note that poi.jar exports this too) >>>> >>>> I'm getting another problem with servicemix bundles related to >>>> com.sun.tools.xjc. it seems that there is no bundle exporting >>>> com.sun.source.tree that is being required: >>>> >>>> ERROR: Bundle org.drools.decisiontables [38] Error starting >>>> mvn:org.drools/drools-decisiontables/6.0.0-SNAPSHOT >>>> (org.osgi.framework.BundleException: Unresolved constraint in bundle >>>> org.drools.decisiontables [38]: Unable to resolve 38.0: missing requirement >>>> [38.0] osgi.wiring.package; >>>> (osgi.wiring.package=org.drools.compiler.compiler) [caused by: Unable to >>>> resolve 29.0: missing requirement [29.0] osgi.wiring.package; >>>> (osgi.wiring.package=org.drools.core) [caused by: Unable to resolve 30.0: >>>> missing requirement [30.0] osgi.wiring.package; >>>> (osgi.wiring.package=com.sun.tools.xjc) [caused by: Unable to resolve 32.0: >>>> missing requirement [32.0] osgi.wiring.package; >>>> (osgi.wiring.package=com.sun.source.tree)]]]) >>>> org.osgi.framework.BundleException: Unresolved constraint in bundle >>>> org.drools.decisiontables [38]: Unable to resolve 38.0: missing requirement >>>> [38.0] osgi.wiring.package; >>>> (osgi.wiring.package=org.drools.compiler.compiler) [caused by: Unable to >>>> resolve 29.0: missing requirement [29.0] osgi.wiring.package; >>>> (osgi.wiring.package=org.drools.core) [caused by: Unable to resolve 30.0: >>>> missing requirement [30.0] osgi.wiring.package; >>>> (osgi.wiring.package=com.sun.tools.xjc) [caused by: Unable to resolve 32.0: >>>> missing requirement [32.0] osgi.wiring.package; >>>> (osgi.wiring.package=com.sun.source.tree)]]] >>>> >>>> I'm using this deps: >>>> >>>> <dependency> >>>> <groupId>org.apache.servicemix.bundles</groupId> >>>> >>>> <artifactId>org.apache.servicemix.bundles.jaxb-xjc</artifactId> >>>> <version>2.2.6_1</version> >>>> </dependency> >>>> <dependency> >>>> <groupId>org.apache.servicemix.bundles</groupId> >>>> >>>> <artifactId>org.apache.servicemix.bundles.jaxb-impl</artifactId> >>>> <version>2.2.6_1</version> >>>> </dependency> >>>> <dependency> >>>> <groupId>org.apache.servicemix.specs</groupId> >>>> >>>> <artifactId>org.apache.servicemix.specs.jaxb-api-2.2</artifactId> >>>> <version>2.2.0</version> >>>> </dependency> >>>> <dependency> >>>> <groupId>org.apache.servicemix.specs</groupId> >>>> >>>> <artifactId>org.apache.servicemix.specs.activation-api-1.1</artifactId> >>>> <version>2.2.0</version> >>>> </dependency> >>>> <dependency> >>>> <groupId>org.apache.servicemix.specs</groupId> >>>> >>>> <artifactId>org.apache.servicemix.specs.stax-api-1.2</artifactId> >>>> <version>2.2.0</version> >>>> </dependency> >>>> >>>> >>>> 2013/3/27 Charles Moulliard <ch007m(a)gmail.com&gt; >>>> >>>>> Can you please provide me the list of packages to be exported and I >>>>> will include also poi-ooxml ? >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 3:03 PM, Cristiano Gavião <cvgaviao(a)gmail.com >>>>> > wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> 2013/3/27 Charles Moulliard <ch007m(a)gmail.com&gt; >>>>>> >>>>>>> 1) For Karaf project, we mostly use activator or Aries Blueprint ( >>>>>>> http://aries.apache.org/modules/blueprint.html). Declarative >>>>>>> Service is rather new top of karaf ( >>>>>>> http://sully6768.blogspot.be/2012/09/scr-components-with-karaf.html >>>>>>> ) >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> As a consumer you can still using both blueprint or BundleContext.getService() >>>>>> to reference the services. >>>>>> >>>>>> What I found good in both Blueprint and DS is that they ensure the >>>>>> component/services lifecycle and we could still use Configuration Admin >>>>>> with them. >>>>>> >>>>>> The problem with blueprint is that is not default installed in most >>>>>> distributions while DS is. >>>>>> Is DS installed by default in Karaf? >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> 2) For poi-ooxml, we should use the ServiceMix bundle ( >>>>>>> http://repo1.maven.org/maven2/org/apache/servicemix/bundles/org.apache.se...) >>>>>>> until they provide a OSGI bundle of POI. >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Unfortunately this bundle don't export the package needed. it wraps >>>>>> the poi.jar but not poi-ooxml. org.apache.poi.ss.usermodel.Workbook.class :( >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 1:53 PM, Cristiano Gavião < >>>>>>> cvgaviao(a)gmail.com&gt; wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> I won't change that code for while... It is still be there until >>>>>>>> you decide to move it to the new one. ;) >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Btw, I have two questions: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> 1)what do you think about to use Declarative Services to register >>>>>>>> the services instead do it manually at activator ? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> 2) how are you dealing with poi-ooxml dependency in >>>>>>>> drools-decisiontables? there is no osgified jar for it... >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> 2013/3/27 Charles Moulliard <ch007m(a)gmail.com&gt; >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Hi Christiano, >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> I prefer that first we finalize the OSGI bundles >>>>>>>>> (drools-decisiontables, drools-jpa, drools-jbpm, ...) before changing >>>>>>>>> pax-exam code which is working and also used by Apache Camel/Karaf projects >>>>>>>>> ;-) >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Regards, >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Charles >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 1:44 PM, Cristiano Gavião < >>>>>>>>> cvgaviao(a)gmail.com&gt; wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Hello, >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> I already look at it. The problem is that this tests are using >>>>>>>>>> an old version (2.x) of pax-exam and using a karaf specific api too. >>>>>>>>>> That version will be dropped by karaf team soon. see [1] and [2]. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Btw, Pax-exam was improved a lot in version 3.x. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> [1] - >>>>>>>>>> http://karaf.922171.n3.nabble.com/Discuss-Karaf-and-Pax-Exam-3-x-td402807... >>>>>>>>>> [2] - https://ops4j1.jira.com/browse/PAXEXAM-503 >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> regards, >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Cristiano >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> 2013/3/27 Charles Moulliard <ch007m(a)gmail.com&gt; >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Christiano, >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Can you please have a look here as there is already a pax-exam >>>>>>>>>>> test for karaf ( >>>>>>>>>>> https://github.com/droolsjbpm/droolsjbpm-integration/tree/master/drools-o...) >>>>>>>>>>> ? >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Regards, >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Charles >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Mar 26, 2013 at 11:11 AM, Cristiano Gavião < >>>>>>>>>>> cvgaviao(a)gmail.com&gt; wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> I'm creating a pax-exam project where I will run some test >>>>>>>>>>>> on top of equinox and felix. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> After I commit and push it maybe you could add karaf stuffs. >>>>>>>>>>>> so it could help us to identify the reason of the error you are talking >>>>>>>>>>>> about... >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> On 25/03/13 14:19, Charles Moulliard wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> There was another error when using singleton := true. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, Mar 25, 2013 at 6:15 PM, Cristiano Gavião < >>>>>>>>>>>> cvgaviao(a)gmail.com&gt; wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> well, I never seen any error related to singleton attribute >>>>>>>>>>>>> at Felix or Equinox. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> The error you have reported seems to be related to what is >>>>>>>>>>>>> being done (and not being undone) inside the activator... >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> 2013/3/25 Charles Moulliard <ch007m(a)gmail.com&gt; >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Not at all but using singleton := true option generates >>>>>>>>>>>>>> error when we do a stop, update start on Apache Karaf. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> We never used that property to generate all the bundles that >>>>>>>>>>>>>> we have in the project Karaf, ServiceMix, Geronimo, ... >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, Mar 25, 2013 at 4:34 PM, Cristiano Gavião < >>>>>>>>>>>>>> cvgaviao(a)gmail.com&gt; wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Charles, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I saw that you removed singleton:=true in your commit. This >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> is because do you plan to have more than one version of drools/jbpm running >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> at same time? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> regards, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Cristiano >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2013/3/25 Cristiano Gavião <cvgaviao(a)gmail.com&gt; >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Charles, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I already changed the manifest generation of kie and other >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> drools modules. I created some pull requests for such changes. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Next thing that I planned to do this week(Wed) was to >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> review each Activator, I think we could improve it... >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> regards, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Cristiano >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 25/03/13 04:52, Charles Moulliard wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The org.kie.api.osgi.Activator class of kie >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> project needs the class ServiceRegistryImpl (& Interface ServiceRegistry of >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> kie internal) to register an OSGI Service (Interface) >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> this.serviceRegistry = bc.registerService( >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ServiceRegistry.class.getName(), >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ServiceRegistryImpl.getInstance(), >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> new >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hashtable() ); >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> but the maven module kie api does not have a dependency >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> with kie internal as the class ServiceRegistry & ServiceRegistryImpl are >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> part of the module kie internal & package org.kie.internal.utils >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Questions : >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - What are the plans regarding to the Activator of Kie api >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> bundle - what does it want to do ? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - Can we add the missing dependency in kie api project ? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Regards, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Charles Moulliard >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Apache Committer / Sr. Enterprise Architect (RedHat) >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Twitter : @cmoulliard | Blog : >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://cmoulliard.blogspot.com >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> rules-dev mailing listrules-dev@lists.jboss.orghttps://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "Tudo vale a pena se a alma não é pequena..." >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> rules-dev mailing list >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> rules-dev(a)lists.jboss.org >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Charles Moulliard >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Apache Committer / Sr. Enterprise Architect (RedHat) >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Twitter : @cmoulliard | Blog : >>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://cmoulliard.blogspot.com >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>>>>>>>>>> rules-dev mailing list >>>>>>>>>>>>>> rules-dev(a)lists.jboss.org >>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>>>>>>>>> rules-dev mailing list >>>>>>>>>>>>> rules-dev(a)lists.jboss.org >>>>>>>>>>>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>>>>> Charles Moulliard >>>>>>>>>>>> Apache Committer / Sr. Enterprise Architect (RedHat) >>>>>>>>>>>> Twitter : @cmoulliard | Blog : http://cmoulliard.blogspot.com >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>>>>>>>> rules-dev mailing listrules-dev@lists.jboss.orghttps://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>>>>>>>> rules-dev mailing list >>>>>>>>>>>> rules-dev(a)lists.jboss.org >>>>>>>>>>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>>>> Charles Moulliard >>>>>>>>>>> Apache Committer / Sr. Enterprise Architect (RedHat) >>>>>>>>>>> Twitter : @cmoulliard | Blog : http://cmoulliard.blogspot.com >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>>>>>>> rules-dev mailing list >>>>>>>>>>> rules-dev(a)lists.jboss.org >>>>>>>>>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>>> "Tudo vale a pena se a alma não é pequena..." >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>>>>>> rules-dev mailing list >>>>>>>>>> rules-dev(a)lists.jboss.org >>>>>>>>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>> Charles Moulliard >>>>>>>>> Apache Committer / Sr. Enterprise Architect (RedHat) >>>>>>>>> Twitter : @cmoulliard | Blog : http://cmoulliard.blogspot.com >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>>>>> rules-dev mailing list >>>>>>>>> rules-dev(a)lists.jboss.org >>>>>>>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>> "Tudo vale a pena se a alma não é pequena..." >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>>>> rules-dev mailing list >>>>>>>> rules-dev(a)lists.jboss.org >>>>>>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> -- >>>>>>> Charles Moulliard >>>>>>> Apache Committer / Sr. Enterprise Architect (RedHat) >>>>>>> Twitter : @cmoulliard | Blog : http://cmoulliard.blogspot.com >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>>> rules-dev mailing list >>>>>>> rules-dev(a)lists.jboss.org >>>>>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> -- >>>>>> "Tudo vale a pena se a alma não é pequena..." >>>>>> >>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>> rules-dev mailing list >>>>>> rules-dev(a)lists.jboss.org >>>>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> Charles Moulliard >>>>> Apache Committer / Sr. Enterprise Architect (RedHat) >>>>> Twitter : @cmoulliard | Blog : http://cmoulliard.blogspot.com >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>> rules-dev mailing list >>>>> rules-dev(a)lists.jboss.org >>>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> "Tudo vale a pena se a alma não é pequena..." >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> rules-dev mailing list >>>> rules-dev(a)lists.jboss.org >>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev >>>> >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Charles Moulliard >>> Apache Committer / Sr. Enterprise Architect (RedHat) >>> Twitter : @cmoulliard | Blog : http://cmoulliard.blogspot.com >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> rules-dev mailing list >>> rules-dev(a)lists.jboss.org >>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev >>> >> >> >> >> -- >> "Tudo vale a pena se a alma não é pequena..." >> >> _______________________________________________ >> rules-dev mailing list >> rules-dev(a)lists.jboss.org >> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev >> > > > > -- > Charles Moulliard > Apache Committer / Sr. Enterprise Architect (RedHat) > Twitter : @cmoulliard | Blog : http://cmoulliard.blogspot.com > > -- Charles Moulliard Apache Committer / Sr. Enterprise Architect (RedHat) Twitter : @cmoulliard | Blog : http://cmoulliard.blogspot.com _______________________________________________ rules-dev mailing list rules-dev(a)lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev

We can use both on Karaf. Anyway the question is more for the moment "Which OSGI services would we like to expose on OSGI platform" instead of How to achieve that ? On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 1:51 PM, Cristiano Gavião <cvgaviao(a)gmail.com&gt;wrote: > I agree with you.... Blueprint and CDI has this advantage over DS. > > But I think I never had the necessity to inject beans in many years of > development with OSGi. Injecting simple components and services fitted well > all my needs. :) And the best from DS is that it is smart, small and fast. > > As Blueprint, CDI and DS uses xml we can provide all. But I don't know If > there is a way to choose only one at runtime... I mean, what could happen > in a system where we have both Blueprint and DS active? > > > 2013/3/28 Charles Moulliard <ch007m(a)gmail.com&gt; > >> There is nevertheless one advantage of Aries Blueprint over Declarative >> Service which is : >> "Unlike Declarative Services, Blueprint can inject not only OSGi >> services, but also managed beans, i.e. plain old Java objects. Managed >> beans are local to the current component and cannot be injected into other >> components. Each Blueprint-enabled bundle has its own Blueprint context >> with managed beans and OSGi service references. The contexts of different >> bundles can interact by injecting services published by another bundle." >> >> >> On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 8:26 PM, Charles Moulliard <ch007m(a)gmail.com&gt;wrote: >> >>> Great ! >>> >>> >>> On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 7:04 PM, Cristiano Gavião <cvgaviao(a)gmail.com&gt;wrote: >>> >>>> Hi Charles, >>>> >>>> Step one (installation of bundles and its dependencies) seems to be >>>> ok ;) >>>> >>>> [INFO] drools-osgi-enviroment-tests ...................... SUCCESS >>>> [6.559s] >>>> [INFO] drools-osgi-enviroment-tests-common ............... SUCCESS >>>> [15.887s] >>>> [INFO] drools-osgi-enviroment-tests-equinox-juno ......... SUCCESS >>>> [20.176s] >>>> [INFO] drools-osgi-enviroment-tests-equinox-kepler ....... SUCCESS >>>> [17.581s] >>>> [INFO] drools-osgi-enviroment-tests-felix ................ SUCCESS >>>> [15.874s] >>>> [INFO] drools-osgi-enviroment-tests-jbosgi ............... SUCCESS >>>> [39.769s] >>>> [INFO] drools-osgi-enviroment-tests-knoplerfish .......... SUCCESS >>>> [14.839s] >>>> [INFO] >>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >>>> >>>> next step is to reuse the existent tests-jars >>>> >>>> cheers, >>>> >>>> >>>> Cristiano >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> 2013/3/27 Charles Moulliard <ch007m(a)gmail.com&gt; >>>> >>>>> I think that those packages have been added since JDK 1.7 xxx. Reason >>>>> why you should deploy the following bundles : >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> https://github.com/droolsjbpm/droolsjbpm-integration/blob/master/drools-o... >>>>> >>>>> with these versions >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> https://github.com/droolsjbpm/droolsjbpm-integration/blob/master/drools-o... >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> and more specifically 2.2.1 for jaxb-x >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 4:32 PM, Cristiano Gavião <cvgaviao(a)gmail.com >>>>> > wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> The packages that I'm aware of until now is: >>>>>> - org.apache.poi.openxml4j.exceptions >>>>>> - org.apache.poi.ss.usermodel (note that poi.jar exports this too) >>>>>> >>>>>> I'm getting another problem with servicemix bundles related to >>>>>> com.sun.tools.xjc. it seems that there is no bundle exporting >>>>>> com.sun.source.tree that is being required: >>>>>> >>>>>> ERROR: Bundle org.drools.decisiontables [38] Error starting >>>>>> mvn:org.drools/drools-decisiontables/6.0.0-SNAPSHOT >>>>>> (org.osgi.framework.BundleException: Unresolved constraint in bundle >>>>>> org.drools.decisiontables [38]: Unable to resolve 38.0: missing requirement >>>>>> [38.0] osgi.wiring.package; >>>>>> (osgi.wiring.package=org.drools.compiler.compiler) [caused by: Unable to >>>>>> resolve 29.0: missing requirement [29.0] osgi.wiring.package; >>>>>> (osgi.wiring.package=org.drools.core) [caused by: Unable to resolve 30.0: >>>>>> missing requirement [30.0] osgi.wiring.package; >>>>>> (osgi.wiring.package=com.sun.tools.xjc) [caused by: Unable to resolve 32.0: >>>>>> missing requirement [32.0] osgi.wiring.package; >>>>>> (osgi.wiring.package=com.sun.source.tree)]]]) >>>>>> org.osgi.framework.BundleException: Unresolved constraint in bundle >>>>>> org.drools.decisiontables [38]: Unable to resolve 38.0: missing requirement >>>>>> [38.0] osgi.wiring.package; >>>>>> (osgi.wiring.package=org.drools.compiler.compiler) [caused by: Unable to >>>>>> resolve 29.0: missing requirement [29.0] osgi.wiring.package; >>>>>> (osgi.wiring.package=org.drools.core) [caused by: Unable to resolve 30.0: >>>>>> missing requirement [30.0] osgi.wiring.package; >>>>>> (osgi.wiring.package=com.sun.tools.xjc) [caused by: Unable to resolve 32.0: >>>>>> missing requirement [32.0] osgi.wiring.package; >>>>>> (osgi.wiring.package=com.sun.source.tree)]]] >>>>>> >>>>>> I'm using this deps: >>>>>> >>>>>> <dependency> >>>>>> <groupId>org.apache.servicemix.bundles</groupId> >>>>>> >>>>>> <artifactId>org.apache.servicemix.bundles.jaxb-xjc</artifactId> >>>>>> <version>2.2.6_1</version> >>>>>> </dependency> >>>>>> <dependency> >>>>>> <groupId>org.apache.servicemix.bundles</groupId> >>>>>> >>>>>> <artifactId>org.apache.servicemix.bundles.jaxb-impl</artifactId> >>>>>> <version>2.2.6_1</version> >>>>>> </dependency> >>>>>> <dependency> >>>>>> <groupId>org.apache.servicemix.specs</groupId> >>>>>> >>>>>> <artifactId>org.apache.servicemix.specs.jaxb-api-2.2</artifactId> >>>>>> <version>2.2.0</version> >>>>>> </dependency> >>>>>> <dependency> >>>>>> <groupId>org.apache.servicemix.specs</groupId> >>>>>> >>>>>> <artifactId>org.apache.servicemix.specs.activation-api-1.1</artifactId> >>>>>> <version>2.2.0</version> >>>>>> </dependency> >>>>>> <dependency> >>>>>> <groupId>org.apache.servicemix.specs</groupId> >>>>>> >>>>>> <artifactId>org.apache.servicemix.specs.stax-api-1.2</artifactId> >>>>>> <version>2.2.0</version> >>>>>> </dependency> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> 2013/3/27 Charles Moulliard <ch007m(a)gmail.com&gt; >>>>>> >>>>>>> Can you please provide me the list of packages to be exported and I >>>>>>> will include also poi-ooxml ? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 3:03 PM, Cristiano Gavião < >>>>>>> cvgaviao(a)gmail.com&gt; wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> 2013/3/27 Charles Moulliard <ch007m(a)gmail.com&gt; >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> 1) For Karaf project, we mostly use activator or Aries Blueprint ( >>>>>>>>> http://aries.apache.org/modules/blueprint.html). Declarative >>>>>>>>> Service is rather new top of karaf ( >>>>>>>>> http://sully6768.blogspot.be/2012/09/scr-components-with-karaf.html >>>>>>>>> ) >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> As a consumer you can still using both blueprint or BundleContext.getService() >>>>>>>> to reference the services. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> What I found good in both Blueprint and DS is that they ensure the >>>>>>>> component/services lifecycle and we could still use Configuration Admin >>>>>>>> with them. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> The problem with blueprint is that is not default installed in >>>>>>>> most distributions while DS is. >>>>>>>> Is DS installed by default in Karaf? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> 2) For poi-ooxml, we should use the ServiceMix bundle ( >>>>>>>>> http://repo1.maven.org/maven2/org/apache/servicemix/bundles/org.apache.se...) >>>>>>>>> until they provide a OSGI bundle of POI. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Unfortunately this bundle don't export the package needed. it >>>>>>>> wraps the poi.jar but not poi-ooxml. >>>>>>>> org.apache.poi.ss.usermodel.Workbook.class :( >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 1:53 PM, Cristiano Gavião < >>>>>>>>> cvgaviao(a)gmail.com&gt; wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> I won't change that code for while... It is still be there until >>>>>>>>>> you decide to move it to the new one. ;) >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Btw, I have two questions: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> 1)what do you think about to use Declarative Services to >>>>>>>>>> register the services instead do it manually at activator ? >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> 2) how are you dealing with poi-ooxml dependency in >>>>>>>>>> drools-decisiontables? there is no osgified jar for it... >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> 2013/3/27 Charles Moulliard <ch007m(a)gmail.com&gt; >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Hi Christiano, >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> I prefer that first we finalize the OSGI bundles >>>>>>>>>>> (drools-decisiontables, drools-jpa, drools-jbpm, ...) before changing >>>>>>>>>>> pax-exam code which is working and also used by Apache Camel/Karaf projects >>>>>>>>>>> ;-) >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Regards, >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Charles >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 1:44 PM, Cristiano Gavião < >>>>>>>>>>> cvgaviao(a)gmail.com&gt; wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Hello, >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> I already look at it. The problem is that this tests are using >>>>>>>>>>>> an old version (2.x) of pax-exam and using a karaf specific api too. >>>>>>>>>>>> That version will be dropped by karaf team soon. see [1] and >>>>>>>>>>>> [2]. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Btw, Pax-exam was improved a lot in version 3.x. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> [1] - >>>>>>>>>>>> http://karaf.922171.n3.nabble.com/Discuss-Karaf-and-Pax-Exam-3-x-td402807... >>>>>>>>>>>> [2] - https://ops4j1.jira.com/browse/PAXEXAM-503 >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> regards, >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Cristiano >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> 2013/3/27 Charles Moulliard <ch007m(a)gmail.com&gt; >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Christiano, >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Can you please have a look here as there is already a >>>>>>>>>>>>> pax-exam test for karaf ( >>>>>>>>>>>>> https://github.com/droolsjbpm/droolsjbpm-integration/tree/master/drools-o...) >>>>>>>>>>>>> ? >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Regards, >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Charles >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Mar 26, 2013 at 11:11 AM, Cristiano Gavião < >>>>>>>>>>>>> cvgaviao(a)gmail.com&gt; wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> I'm creating a pax-exam project where I will run some test >>>>>>>>>>>>>> on top of equinox and felix. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> After I commit and push it maybe you could add karaf stuffs. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> so it could help us to identify the reason of the error you are talking >>>>>>>>>>>>>> about... >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 25/03/13 14:19, Charles Moulliard wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> There was another error when using singleton := true. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, Mar 25, 2013 at 6:15 PM, Cristiano Gavião < >>>>>>>>>>>>>> cvgaviao(a)gmail.com&gt; wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> well, I never seen any error related to singleton attribute >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> at Felix or Equinox. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The error you have reported seems to be related to what is >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> being done (and not being undone) inside the activator... >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2013/3/25 Charles Moulliard <ch007m(a)gmail.com&gt; >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Not at all but using singleton := true option generates >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> error when we do a stop, update start on Apache Karaf. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> We never used that property to generate all the bundles >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that we have in the project Karaf, ServiceMix, Geronimo, ... >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, Mar 25, 2013 at 4:34 PM, Cristiano Gavião < >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> cvgaviao(a)gmail.com&gt; wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Charles, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I saw that you removed singleton:=true in your commit. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> This is because do you plan to have more than one version of drools/jbpm >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> running at same time? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> regards, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Cristiano >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2013/3/25 Cristiano Gavião <cvgaviao(a)gmail.com&gt; >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Charles, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I already changed the manifest generation of kie and >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> other drools modules. I created some pull requests for such changes. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Next thing that I planned to do this week(Wed) was to >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> review each Activator, I think we could improve it... >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> regards, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Cristiano >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 25/03/13 04:52, Charles Moulliard wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The org.kie.api.osgi.Activator class of kie >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> project needs the class ServiceRegistryImpl (& Interface ServiceRegistry of >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> kie internal) to register an OSGI Service (Interface) >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> this.serviceRegistry = bc.registerService( >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ServiceRegistry.class.getName(), >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ServiceRegistryImpl.getInstance(), >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> new >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hashtable() ); >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> but the maven module kie api does not have a >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> dependency with kie internal as the class ServiceRegistry & >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ServiceRegistryImpl are part of the module kie internal & package >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> org.kie.internal.utils >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Questions : >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - What are the plans regarding to the Activator of Kie >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> api bundle - what does it want to do ? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - Can we add the missing dependency in kie api project ? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Regards, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Charles Moulliard >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Apache Committer / Sr. Enterprise Architect (RedHat) >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Twitter : @cmoulliard | Blog : >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://cmoulliard.blogspot.com >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> rules-dev mailing listrules-dev@lists.jboss.orghttps://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "Tudo vale a pena se a alma não é pequena..." >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> rules-dev mailing list >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> rules-dev(a)lists.jboss.org >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Charles Moulliard >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Apache Committer / Sr. Enterprise Architect (RedHat) >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Twitter : @cmoulliard | Blog : >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://cmoulliard.blogspot.com >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> rules-dev mailing list >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> rules-dev(a)lists.jboss.org >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> rules-dev mailing list >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> rules-dev(a)lists.jboss.org >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Charles Moulliard >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Apache Committer / Sr. Enterprise Architect (RedHat) >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Twitter : @cmoulliard | Blog : >>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://cmoulliard.blogspot.com >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>>>>>>>>>> rules-dev mailing listrules-dev@lists.jboss.orghttps://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>>>>>>>>>> rules-dev mailing list >>>>>>>>>>>>>> rules-dev(a)lists.jboss.org >>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>>>>>> Charles Moulliard >>>>>>>>>>>>> Apache Committer / Sr. Enterprise Architect (RedHat) >>>>>>>>>>>>> Twitter : @cmoulliard | Blog : http://cmoulliard.blogspot.com >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>>>>>>>>> rules-dev mailing list >>>>>>>>>>>>> rules-dev(a)lists.jboss.org >>>>>>>>>>>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>>>>> "Tudo vale a pena se a alma não é pequena..." >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>>>>>>>> rules-dev mailing list >>>>>>>>>>>> rules-dev(a)lists.jboss.org >>>>>>>>>>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>>>> Charles Moulliard >>>>>>>>>>> Apache Committer / Sr. Enterprise Architect (RedHat) >>>>>>>>>>> Twitter : @cmoulliard | Blog : http://cmoulliard.blogspot.com >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>>>>>>> rules-dev mailing list >>>>>>>>>>> rules-dev(a)lists.jboss.org >>>>>>>>>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>>> "Tudo vale a pena se a alma não é pequena..." >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>>>>>> rules-dev mailing list >>>>>>>>>> rules-dev(a)lists.jboss.org >>>>>>>>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>> Charles Moulliard >>>>>>>>> Apache Committer / Sr. Enterprise Architect (RedHat) >>>>>>>>> Twitter : @cmoulliard | Blog : http://cmoulliard.blogspot.com >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>>>>> rules-dev mailing list >>>>>>>>> rules-dev(a)lists.jboss.org >>>>>>>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>> "Tudo vale a pena se a alma não é pequena..." >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>>>> rules-dev mailing list >>>>>>>> rules-dev(a)lists.jboss.org >>>>>>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> -- >>>>>>> Charles Moulliard >>>>>>> Apache Committer / Sr. Enterprise Architect (RedHat) >>>>>>> Twitter : @cmoulliard | Blog : http://cmoulliard.blogspot.com >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>>> rules-dev mailing list >>>>>>> rules-dev(a)lists.jboss.org >>>>>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> -- >>>>>> "Tudo vale a pena se a alma não é pequena..." >>>>>> >>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>> rules-dev mailing list >>>>>> rules-dev(a)lists.jboss.org >>>>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> Charles Moulliard >>>>> Apache Committer / Sr. Enterprise Architect (RedHat) >>>>> Twitter : @cmoulliard | Blog : http://cmoulliard.blogspot.com >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>> rules-dev mailing list >>>>> rules-dev(a)lists.jboss.org >>>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> "Tudo vale a pena se a alma não é pequena..." >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> rules-dev mailing list >>>> rules-dev(a)lists.jboss.org >>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev >>>> >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Charles Moulliard >>> Apache Committer / Sr. Enterprise Architect (RedHat) >>> Twitter : @cmoulliard | Blog : http://cmoulliard.blogspot.com >>> >>> >> >> >> -- >> Charles Moulliard >> Apache Committer / Sr. Enterprise Architect (RedHat) >> Twitter : @cmoulliard | Blog : http://cmoulliard.blogspot.com >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> rules-dev mailing list >> rules-dev(a)lists.jboss.org >> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev >> > > > > -- > "Tudo vale a pena se a alma não é pequena..." > > _______________________________________________ > rules-dev mailing list > rules-dev(a)lists.jboss.org > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev > -- Charles Moulliard Apache Committer / Sr. Enterprise Architect (RedHat) Twitter : @cmoulliard | Blog : http://cmoulliard.blogspot.com _______________________________________________ rules-dev mailing list rules-dev(a)lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev

I should have a look to the code as I don't know for the moment which one we would like to expose ? On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 2:42 PM, Cristiano Gavião <cvgaviao(a)gmail.com <mailto:cvgaviao@gmail.com>> wrote: well, the ones that is currently exposed is enough for you or do you want something more? 2013/3/28 Charles Moulliard <ch007m(a)gmail.com <mailto:ch007m@gmail.com>> We can use both on Karaf. Anyway the question is more for the moment "Which OSGI services would we like to expose on OSGI platform" instead of How to achieve that ? On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 1:51 PM, Cristiano Gavião <cvgaviao(a)gmail.com <mailto:cvgaviao@gmail.com>> wrote: I agree with you.... Blueprint and CDI has this advantage over DS. But I think I never had the necessity to inject beans in many years of development with OSGi. Injecting simple components and services fitted well all my needs. :) And the best from DS is that it is smart, small and fast. As Blueprint, CDI and DS uses xml we can provide all. But I don't know If there is a way to choose only one at runtime... I mean, what could happen in a system where we have both Blueprint and DS active? 2013/3/28 Charles Moulliard <ch007m(a)gmail.com <mailto:ch007m@gmail.com>> There is nevertheless one advantage of Aries Blueprint over Declarative Service which is : "Unlike Declarative Services, Blueprint can inject not only OSGi services, but also managed beans, i.e. plain old Java objects. Managed beans are local to the current component and cannot be injected into other components. Each Blueprint-enabled bundle has its own Blueprint context with managed beans and OSGi service references. The contexts of different bundles can interact by injecting services published by another bundle." On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 8:26 PM, Charles Moulliard <ch007m(a)gmail.com <mailto:ch007m@gmail.com>> wrote: Great ! On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 7:04 PM, Cristiano Gavião <cvgaviao(a)gmail.com <mailto:cvgaviao@gmail.com>> wrote: Hi Charles, Step one (installation of bundles and its dependencies) seems to be ok ;) [INFO] drools-osgi-enviroment-tests ...................... SUCCESS [6.559s] [INFO] drools-osgi-enviroment-tests-common ............... SUCCESS [15.887s] [INFO] drools-osgi-enviroment-tests-equinox-juno ......... SUCCESS [20.176s] [INFO] drools-osgi-enviroment-tests-equinox-kepler ....... SUCCESS [17.581s] [INFO] drools-osgi-enviroment-tests-felix ................ SUCCESS [15.874s] [INFO] drools-osgi-enviroment-tests-jbosgi ............... SUCCESS [39.769s] [INFO] drools-osgi-enviroment-tests-knoplerfish .......... SUCCESS [14.839s] [INFO] ------------------------------------------------------------------------ next step is to reuse the existent tests-jars cheers, Cristiano 2013/3/27 Charles Moulliard <ch007m(a)gmail.com <mailto:ch007m@gmail.com>> I think that those packages have been added since JDK 1.7 xxx. Reason why you should deploy the following bundles : https://github.com/droolsjbpm/droolsjbpm-integration/blob/master/drools-o... with these versions https://github.com/droolsjbpm/droolsjbpm-integration/blob/master/drools-o... and more specifically 2.2.1 for jaxb-x On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 4:32 PM, Cristiano Gavião <cvgaviao(a)gmail.com <mailto:cvgaviao@gmail.com>> wrote: The packages that I'm aware of until now is: - org.apache.poi.openxml4j.exceptions - org.apache.poi.ss.usermodel (note that poi.jar exports this too) I'm getting another problem with servicemix bundles related to com.sun.tools.xjc. it seems that there is no bundle exporting com.sun.source.tree that is being required: ERROR: Bundle org.drools.decisiontables [38] Error starting mvn:org.drools/drools-decisiontables/6.0.0-SNAPSHOT (org.osgi.framework.BundleException: Unresolved constraint in bundle org.drools.decisiontables [38]: Unable to resolve 38.0: missing requirement [38.0] osgi.wiring.package; (osgi.wiring.package=org.drools.compiler.compiler) [caused by: Unable to resolve 29.0: missing requirement [29.0] osgi.wiring.package; (osgi.wiring.package=org.drools.core) [caused by: Unable to resolve 30.0: missing requirement [30.0] osgi.wiring.package; (osgi.wiring.package=com.sun.tools.xjc) [caused by: Unable to resolve 32.0: missing requirement [32.0] osgi.wiring.package; (osgi.wiring.package=com.sun.source.tree)]]]) org.osgi.framework.BundleException: Unresolved constraint in bundle org.drools.decisiontables [38]: Unable to resolve 38.0: missing requirement [38.0] osgi.wiring.package; (osgi.wiring.package=org.drools.compiler.compiler) [caused by: Unable to resolve 29.0: missing requirement [29.0] osgi.wiring.package; (osgi.wiring.package=org.drools.core) [caused by: Unable to resolve 30.0: missing requirement [30.0] osgi.wiring.package; (osgi.wiring.package=com.sun.tools.xjc) [caused by: Unable to resolve 32.0: missing requirement [32.0] osgi.wiring.package; (osgi.wiring.package=com.sun.source.tree)]]] I'm using this deps: <dependency> <groupId>org.apache.servicemix.bundles</groupId> <artifactId>org.apache.servicemix.bundles.jaxb-xjc</artifactId> <version>2.2.6_1</version> </dependency> <dependency> <groupId>org.apache.servicemix.bundles</groupId> <artifactId>org.apache.servicemix.bundles.jaxb-impl</artifactId> <version>2.2.6_1</version> </dependency> <dependency> <groupId>org.apache.servicemix.specs</groupId> <artifactId>org.apache.servicemix.specs.jaxb-api-2.2</artifactId> <version>2.2.0</version> </dependency> <dependency> <groupId>org.apache.servicemix.specs</groupId> <artifactId>org.apache.servicemix.specs.activation-api-1.1</artifactId> <version>2.2.0</version> </dependency> <dependency> <groupId>org.apache.servicemix.specs</groupId> <artifactId>org.apache.servicemix.specs.stax-api-1.2</artifactId> <version>2.2.0</version> </dependency> 2013/3/27 Charles Moulliard <ch007m(a)gmail.com <mailto:ch007m@gmail.com>> Can you please provide me the list of packages to be exported and I will include also poi-ooxml ? On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 3:03 PM, Cristiano Gavião <cvgaviao(a)gmail.com <mailto:cvgaviao@gmail.com>> wrote: 2013/3/27 Charles Moulliard <ch007m(a)gmail.com <mailto:ch007m@gmail.com>> 1) For Karaf project, we mostly use activator or Aries Blueprint (http://aries.apache.org/modules/blueprint.html). Declarative Service is rather new top of karaf (http://sully6768.blogspot.be/2012/09/scr-components-with-karaf.html) As a consumer you can still using both blueprint or BundleContext.getService() to reference the services. What I found good in both Blueprint and DS is that they ensure the component/services lifecycle and we could still use Configuration Admin with them. The problem with blueprint is that is not default installed in most distributions while DS is. Is DS installed by default in Karaf? 2) For poi-ooxml, we should use the ServiceMix bundle (http://repo1.maven.org/maven2/org/apache/servicemix/bundles/org.apache.se...) until they provide a OSGI bundle of POI. Unfortunately this bundle don't export the package needed. it wraps the poi.jar but not poi-ooxml. org.apache.poi.ss.usermodel.Workbook.class :( On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 1:53 PM, Cristiano Gavião <cvgaviao(a)gmail.com <mailto:cvgaviao@gmail.com>> wrote: I won't change that code for while... It is still be there until you decide to move it to the new one. ;) Btw, I have two questions: 1)what do you think about to use Declarative Services to register the services instead do it manually at activator ? 2) how are you dealing with poi-ooxml dependency in drools-decisiontables? there is no osgified jar for it... 2013/3/27 Charles Moulliard <ch007m(a)gmail.com <mailto:ch007m@gmail.com>> Hi Christiano, I prefer that first we finalize the OSGI bundles (drools-decisiontables, drools-jpa, drools-jbpm, ...) before changing pax-exam code which is working and also used by Apache Camel/Karaf projects ;-) Regards, Charles On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 1:44 PM, Cristiano Gavião <cvgaviao(a)gmail.com <mailto:cvgaviao@gmail.com>> wrote: Hello, I already look at it. The problem is that this tests are using an old version (2.x) of pax-exam and using a karaf specific api too. That version will be dropped by karaf team soon. see [1] and [2]. Btw, Pax-exam was improved a lot in version 3.x. [1] - http://karaf.922171.n3.nabble.com/Discuss-Karaf-and-Pax-Exam-3-x-td402807... [2] - https://ops4j1.jira.com/browse/PAXEXAM-503 regards, Cristiano 2013/3/27 Charles Moulliard <ch007m(a)gmail.com <mailto:ch007m@gmail.com>> Christiano, Can you please have a look here as there is already a pax-exam test for karaf (https://github.com/droolsjbpm/droolsjbpm-integration/tree/master/drools-o...) ? Regards, Charles On Tue, Mar 26, 2013 at 11:11 AM, Cristiano Gavião <cvgaviao(a)gmail.com <mailto:cvgaviao@gmail.com>> wrote: I'm creating a pax-exam project where I will run some test on top of equinox and felix. After I commit and push it maybe you could add karaf stuffs. so it could help us to identify the reason of the error you are talking about... On 25/03/13 14:19, Charles Moulliard wrote: > There > was > another > error > when > using > singleton > := true. > > > On > Mon, > Mar > 25, > 2013 > at > 6:15 > PM, > Cristiano > Gavião <cvgaviao(a)gmail.com > <mailto:cvgaviao@gmail.com>> > wrote: > > well, > I > never > seen > any > error > related > to singleton > attribute > at Felix > or Equinox. > > > The > error > you > have > reported > seems > to be > related > to what > is being > done > (and > not > being > undone) > inside > the > activator... > > > > 2013/3/25 > Charles > Moulliard > <ch007m(a)gmail.com > <mailto:ch007m@gmail.com>> > > Not > at > all > but > using > singleton > := > true > option > generates > error > when > we > do > a stop, > update > start > on > Apache > Karaf. > > We > never > used > that > property > to > generate > all > the > bundles > that > we > have > in > the > project > Karaf, > ServiceMix, > Geronimo, > ... > > > On > Mon, > Mar > 25, > 2013 > at > 4:34 > PM, > Cristiano > Gavião > <cvgaviao(a)gmail.com > <mailto:cvgaviao@gmail.com>> > wrote: > > Charles, > > > I saw > that > you > removed > singleton:=true > in > your > commit. > This > is > because > do > you > plan > to > have > more > than > one > version > of > drools/jbpm > running > at > same > time? > > regards, > > Cristiano > > > > 2013/3/25 > Cristiano > Gavião > <cvgaviao(a)gmail.com > <mailto:cvgaviao@gmail.com>> > > Charles, > > I already > changed > the > manifest > generation > of > kie > and > other > drools > modules. > I created > some > pull > requests > for > such > changes. > > Next > thing > that > I planned > to > do > this > week(Wed) > was > to > review > each > Activator, > I think > we > could > improve > it... > > > regards, > > Cristiano > > > > On > 25/03/13 > 04:52, > Charles > Moulliard > wrote: >> Hi, >> >> >> The org.kie.api.osgi.Activator >> class >> of >> kie >> project needs >> the >> class >> ServiceRegistryImpl >> (& >> Interface >> ServiceRegistry >> of >> kie >> internal) >> to >> register >> an >> OSGI >> Service >> (Interface) >> >> this.serviceRegistry >> = bc.registerService( >> ServiceRegistry.class.getName(), >> ServiceRegistryImpl.getInstance(), >> new >> Hashtable() >> ); >> >> but >> the >> maven >> module >> kie >> api >> does >> not >> have >> a dependency >> with >> kie >> internal >> as >> the >> class >> ServiceRegistry >> & ServiceRegistryImpl >> are >> part >> of >> the >> module >> kie >> internal >> & package >> org.kie.internal.utils >> >> Questions >> : >> - What >> are >> the >> plans >> regarding >> to >> the >> Activator >> of >> Kie >> api >> bundle >> - what >> does >> it >> want >> to >> do >> ? >> - Can >> we >> add >> the >> missing dependency >> in >> kie >> api >> project >> ? >> >> Regards, >> -- >> >> Charles >> Moulliard >> Apache >> Committer >> / Sr. >> Enterprise >> Architect >> (RedHat) >> Twitter >> : @cmoulliard >> | Blog >> : http://cmoulliard.blogspot.com >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> rules-dev mailing list >> rules-dev(a)lists.jboss.org <mailto:rules-dev@lists.jboss.org> >> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev > > > > > -- > > "Tudo > vale > a pena > se > a alma > não > é pequena..." > > _______________________________________________ > rules-dev > mailing > list > rules-dev(a)lists.jboss.org > <mailto:rules-dev@lists.jboss.org> > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev > > > > > -- > > Charles > Moulliard > Apache > Committer > / Sr. > Enterprise > Architect > (RedHat) > Twitter > : @cmoulliard > | Blog > : http://cmoulliard.blogspot.com > > > _______________________________________________ > rules-dev > mailing > list > rules-dev(a)lists.jboss.org > <mailto:rules-dev@lists.jboss.org> > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev > > > > _______________________________________________ > rules-dev > mailing > list > rules-dev(a)lists.jboss.org > <mailto:rules-dev@lists.jboss.org> > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev > > > > > -- > Charles > Moulliard > Apache Committer > / Sr. > Enterprise > Architect > (RedHat) > Twitter > : > @cmoulliard > | Blog : > http://cmoulliard.blogspot.com > > > > _______________________________________________ > rules-dev mailing list > rules-dev(a)lists.jboss.org <mailto:rules-dev@lists.jboss.org> > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev _______________________________________________ rules-dev mailing list rules-dev(a)lists.jboss.org <mailto:rules-dev@lists.jboss.org> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev -- Charles Moulliard Apache Committer / Sr. Enterprise Architect (RedHat) Twitter : @cmoulliard | Blog : http://cmoulliard.blogspot.com _______________________________________________ rules-dev mailing list rules-dev(a)lists.jboss.org <mailto:rules-dev@lists.jboss.org> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev -- "Tudo vale a pena se a alma não é pequena..." _______________________________________________ rules-dev mailing list rules-dev(a)lists.jboss.org <mailto:rules-dev@lists.jboss.org> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev -- Charles Moulliard Apache Committer / Sr. Enterprise Architect (RedHat) Twitter : @cmoulliard | Blog : http://cmoulliard.blogspot.com _______________________________________________ rules-dev mailing list rules-dev(a)lists.jboss.org <mailto:rules-dev@lists.jboss.org> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev -- "Tudo vale a pena se a alma não é pequena..." _______________________________________________ rules-dev mailing list rules-dev(a)lists.jboss.org <mailto:rules-dev@lists.jboss.org> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev -- Charles Moulliard Apache Committer / Sr. Enterprise Architect (RedHat) Twitter : @cmoulliard | Blog : http://cmoulliard.blogspot.com _______________________________________________ rules-dev mailing list rules-dev(a)lists.jboss.org <mailto:rules-dev@lists.jboss.org> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev -- "Tudo vale a pena se a alma não é pequena..." _______________________________________________ rules-dev mailing list rules-dev(a)lists.jboss.org <mailto:rules-dev@lists.jboss.org> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev -- Charles Moulliard Apache Committer / Sr. Enterprise Architect (RedHat) Twitter : @cmoulliard | Blog : http://cmoulliard.blogspot.com _______________________________________________ rules-dev mailing list rules-dev(a)lists.jboss.org <mailto:rules-dev@lists.jboss.org> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev -- "Tudo vale a pena se a alma não é pequena..." _______________________________________________ rules-dev mailing list rules-dev(a)lists.jboss.org <mailto:rules-dev@lists.jboss.org> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev -- Charles Moulliard Apache Committer / Sr. Enterprise Architect (RedHat) Twitter : @cmoulliard | Blog : http://cmoulliard.blogspot.com _______________________________________________ rules-dev mailing list rules-dev(a)lists.jboss.org <mailto:rules-dev@lists.jboss.org> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev -- "Tudo vale a pena se a alma não é pequena..." _______________________________________________ rules-dev mailing list rules-dev(a)lists.jboss.org <mailto:rules-dev@lists.jboss.org> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev -- Charles Moulliard Apache Committer / Sr. Enterprise Architect (RedHat) Twitter : @cmoulliard | Blog : http://cmoulliard.blogspot.com -- Charles Moulliard Apache Committer / Sr. Enterprise Architect (RedHat) Twitter : @cmoulliard | Blog : http://cmoulliard.blogspot.com _______________________________________________ rules-dev mailing list rules-dev(a)lists.jboss.org <mailto:rules-dev@lists.jboss.org> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev -- "Tudo vale a pena se a alma não é pequena..." _______________________________________________ rules-dev mailing list rules-dev(a)lists.jboss.org <mailto:rules-dev@lists.jboss.org> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev -- Charles Moulliard Apache Committer / Sr. Enterprise Architect (RedHat) Twitter : @cmoulliard | Blog : http://cmoulliard.blogspot.com _______________________________________________ rules-dev mailing list rules-dev(a)lists.jboss.org <mailto:rules-dev@lists.jboss.org> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev -- "Tudo vale a pena se a alma não é pequena..." _______________________________________________ rules-dev mailing list rules-dev(a)lists.jboss.org <mailto:rules-dev@lists.jboss.org> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev -- Charles Moulliard Apache Committer / Sr. Enterprise Architect (RedHat) Twitter : @cmoulliard | Blog : http://cmoulliard.blogspot.com _______________________________________________ rules-dev mailing list rules-dev(a)lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev

Adding poi-ooxml + poi-ooxml-schemas is more complex than I supposed as the code source of poi-ooxml-schemas has not been published in maven repo ;-)