9:17 a.m.
Hi,
I've got an other problem with an eval function.
I will try to discribe the path to the error.
I've got a repository where some people can put rules with .drl extension.
My program is listing this repository and execute every rule in this
repository.
At the begining, I've got a 'PatientDto' who have a property :
int nbFactRisque;
(with getters and setters)
Some rules increments this number.
In the last rule (the rules are executed in alphabetic mode) I'm testing
this number like this :
rule "RisqueNormal"
when
$patient : PatientDto()
eval( $patient.getNbFactRisque() == 0)
then
$patient.addDonnees( Constants.CLE_RISQUEPATIENT,
Constants.RISQUE_NORMAL );
System.out.println("RisqueNormal vérifié." +
$patient.getNbFactRisque() + "Facteurs.");
end
Here's my problem :
The 'Then' traitement is always executed so the eval always think that
$patient.getNbFactRisque() is equal to 0.
But the system.out.println() show me that $patient.getNbFactRisque() = 2 !
Here's the output : "RisqueNormal vérifié.2Facteurs.".
Perhaps I did something wrong ? Can someone help me ?
Thank you.
10:03 a.m.
Please do not use this list for simple questions - it is reserved for
discussion Drools development itself.
(1) Did you inform the Drools engine about incrementing nbFactRisque?
(2) There is no such thing as "alphabetic mode" for rule execution.
(3) Why do you use eval when you can test the fact field?
Indication: Drools Expert manual, three times per day ;-)
-W
On 1 March 2011 09:17, Nico ROEDERER <ino.nicolas(a)gmail.com> wrote:
Hi,
I've got an other problem with an eval function.
I will try to discribe the path to the error.
I've got a repository where some people can put rules with .drl extension.
My program is listing this repository and execute every rule in this
repository.
At the begining, I've got a 'PatientDto' who have a property :
int nbFactRisque;
(with getters and setters)
Some rules increments this number.
In the last rule (the rules are executed in alphabetic mode) I'm testing
this number like this :
rule "RisqueNormal"
when
$patient : PatientDto()
eval( $patient.getNbFactRisque() == 0)
then
$patient.addDonnees( Constants.CLE_RISQUEPATIENT,
Constants.RISQUE_NORMAL );
System.out.println("RisqueNormal vérifié." +
$patient.getNbFactRisque() + "Facteurs.");
end
Here's my problem :
The 'Then' traitement is always executed so the eval always think that
$patient.getNbFactRisque()
is equal to 0.
But the system.out.println() show me that $patient.getNbFactRisque() = 2
!
Here's the output : "RisqueNormal vérifié.2Facteurs.".
Perhaps I did something wrong ? Can someone help me ?
Thank you.
_______________________________________________
rules-dev mailing list
rules-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev
10:15 a.m.
(1) -> yes because when I print the value, the value is correct ( = 2 ).
Not the eval.
(2) -> yes, true. My list is in alphabtic mode...
(3) -> Every test I make made the wrong result
eval( $patient.getNbFactRisque() == 0)
or $patient : PatientDto( nbFactRisque == 0 ) ...
---> Why does those test are true dispite nbFactRisque = 2 ????
*It works fine when I run x time drools (one call for one rule) but it
doesn't work when I run one time with a List of rules.*
Can you tell me the right mailing list for those problems ?
Le 01/03/2011 10:03, Wolfgang Laun a écrit :
Please do not use this list for simple questions - it is reserved for
discussion Drools development itself.
(1) Did you inform the Drools engine about incrementing nbFactRisque?
(2) There is no such thing as "alphabetic mode" for rule execution.
(3) Why do you use eval when you can test the fact field?
Indication: Drools Expert manual, three times per day ;-)
-W
On 1 March 2011 09:17, Nico ROEDERER <ino.nicolas(a)gmail.com
<mailto:ino.nicolas@gmail.com>> wrote:
Hi,
I've got an other problem with an eval function.
I will try to discribe the path to the error.
I've got a repository where some people can put rules with .drl
extension.
My program is listing this repository and execute every rule in
this repository.
At the begining, I've got a 'PatientDto' who have a property :
int nbFactRisque;
(with getters and setters)
Some rules increments this number.
In the last rule (the rules are executed in alphabetic mode) I'm
testing this number like this :
rule "RisqueNormal"
when
$patient : PatientDto()
eval( $patient.getNbFactRisque() == 0)
then
$patient.addDonnees( Constants.CLE_RISQUEPATIENT,
Constants.RISQUE_NORMAL );
System.out.println("RisqueNormal vérifié." +
$patient.getNbFactRisque() + "Facteurs.");
end
Here's my problem :
The 'Then' traitement is always executed so the eval always think
that $patient.getNbFactRisque() is equal to 0.
But the system.out.println() show me that
$patient.getNbFactRisque() = 2 !
Here's the output : "RisqueNormal vérifié.2Facteurs.".
Perhaps I did something wrong ? Can someone help me ?
Thank you.
_______________________________________________
rules-dev mailing list
rules-dev(a)lists.jboss.org <mailto:rules-dev@lists.jboss.org>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev
_______________________________________________
rules-dev mailing list
rules-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev
10:47 a.m.
The correct list is rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org
On 1 March 2011 10:15, Nico ROEDERER <ino.nicolas(a)gmail.com> wrote:
(1) -> yes because when I print the value, the value is correct (
= 2 ).
Not the eval.
Show us the rule where you increment.
(2) -> yes, true. My list is in alphabtic mode...
This does not matter for the order those rules will fire.
(3) -> Every test I make made the wrong result
Obvious - the problem is somewhere else, not in the test.
-W
10:52 a.m.
Here's one exemple of incrementation :
IN drl file :
rule "FacteurRisqueHomme"
when
$patient : PatientDto()
eval( $patient.getValue( Constants.RULE_KEY_SEXE ).equals(
Constants.SEXE_HOMME )
&& $patient.getDoubleValue( Constants.RULE_KEY_AGE ) >
$patient.getDoubleProperties("valeur.age.homme") )
then
*$patient.incNbFactRisque();*
System.out.println("FacteurRisqueHomme vérifié");
end
In PatientDto :
/**
* Permet l'incrémentation du nombre de risque (depuis une règle drools)
*/
public void incNbFactRisque() {
nbFactRisque++;
}
Le 01/03/2011 10:47, Wolfgang Laun a écrit :
The correct list is rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org
<mailto:rules-users@lists.jboss.org>
On 1 March 2011 10:15, Nico ROEDERER <ino.nicolas(a)gmail.com
<mailto:ino.nicolas@gmail.com>> wrote:
(1) -> yes because when I print the value, the value is correct (
= 2 ). Not the eval.
Show us the rule where you increment.
(2) -> yes, true. My list is in alphabtic mode...
This does not matter for the order those rules will fire.
(3) -> Every test I make made the wrong result
Obvious - the problem is somewhere else, not in the test.
-W
_______________________________________________
rules-dev mailing list
rules-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev
11:07 a.m.
The correct way is
modify( $patient ){
incNbFactRisque()
}
-W
On 1 March 2011 10:52, Nico ROEDERER <ino.nicolas(a)gmail.com> wrote:
Here's one exemple of incrementation :
IN drl file :
rule "FacteurRisqueHomme"
when
$patient : PatientDto()
eval( $patient.getValue( Constants.RULE_KEY_SEXE ).equals(
Constants.SEXE_HOMME )
&& $patient.getDoubleValue( Constants.RULE_KEY_AGE ) >
$patient.getDoubleProperties("valeur.age.homme") )
then
*$patient.incNbFactRisque();*
System.out.println("FacteurRisqueHomme vérifié");
end
In PatientDto :
/**
* Permet l'incrémentation du nombre de risque (depuis une règle drools)
*/
public void incNbFactRisque() {
nbFactRisque++;
}
Le 01/03/2011 10:47, Wolfgang Laun a écrit :
The correct list is rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org
On 1 March 2011 10:15, Nico ROEDERER <ino.nicolas(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> (1) -> yes because when I print the value, the value is correct ( = 2 ).
> Not the eval.
>
Show us the rule where you increment.
> (2) -> yes, true. My list is in alphabtic mode...
>
This does not matter for the order those rules will fire.
> (3) -> Every test I make made the wrong result
>
Obvious - the problem is somewhere else, not in the test.
-W
_______________________________________________
rules-dev mailing
listrules-dev@lists.jboss.orghttps://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev
_______________________________________________
rules-dev mailing list
rules-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev
4861
days inactive
4861
days old
5 comments
2 participants
participants (2)
-
Nico ROEDERER -
Wolfgang Laun