3:53 a.m.
Serializing a compiled package seems a rational thing to do - after all,
there is: <resource source="..." type="PKG" /> and it is
recognized by the
monitor.
However, you can't simply serialize an
org.drools.definition.KnowledgePackage as it is usually done by writing it
to an ObjectOutputStream: deserialization in the KnowledgeAgent throws a CCE
exception. To make it work, you must use a DroolsObjectOutputStream, which
is nothing but a rename of ObjectOutputStream. So I have use
DroolsObjectOutputStream, but it is not part of the public API.
-W
9:34 a.m.
New subject: Today's Eleusinian mystery: deserializing a package forchange set monitoring
Not that it necessarily needs to be fixed but in 5.0.1 you could
serialize a package just using a regular ObjectOutputStream. Also the
guy on the user mailing list was getting an exception using the
DroolsObjectOutputStream.
From: rules-dev-bounces(a)lists.jboss.org
[mailto:rules-dev-bounces@lists.jboss.org] On Behalf Of Wolfgang Laun
Sent: Friday, June 17, 2011 2:54 AM
To: Rules Dev List
Subject: [rules-dev] Today's Eleusinian mystery: deserializing a package
forchange set monitoring
Serializing a compiled package seems a rational thing to do - after all,
there is: <resource source="..." type="PKG" /> and it is
recognized by
the monitor.
However, you can't simply serialize an
org.drools.definition.KnowledgePackage as it is usually done by writing
it to an ObjectOutputStream: deserialization in the KnowledgeAgent
throws a CCE exception. To make it work, you must use a
DroolsObjectOutputStream, which is nothing but a rename of
ObjectOutputStream. So I have use DroolsObjectOutputStream, but it is
not part of the public API.
-W
9:59 a.m.
New subject: Today's Eleusinian mystery: deserializing a package forchange set monitoring
On 17 June 2011 16:34, Joe White <Joe.White(a)recondotech.com> wrote:
Not that it necessarily needs to be fixed but in 5.0.1 you could
serialize
a package just using a regular ObjectOutputStream.
No - the code was not writing anything to a file.
Also the guy
Lisa!
-W
on the user mailing list was getting an exception using the
DroolsObjectOutputStream.****
** **
*From:* rules-dev-bounces(a)lists.jboss.org [mailto:
rules-dev-bounces(a)lists.jboss.org] *On Behalf Of *Wolfgang Laun
*Sent:* Friday, June 17, 2011 2:54 AM
*To:* Rules Dev List
*Subject:* [rules-dev] Today's Eleusinian mystery: deserializing a package
forchange set monitoring****
** **
Serializing a compiled package seems a rational thing to do - after all,
there is: <resource source="..." type="PKG" /> and it is
recognized by the
monitor.
However, you can't simply serialize an
org.drools.definition.KnowledgePackage as it is usually done by writing it
to an ObjectOutputStream: deserialization in the KnowledgeAgent throws a CCE
exception. To make it work, you must use a DroolsObjectOutputStream, which
is nothing but a rename of ObjectOutputStream. So I have use
DroolsObjectOutputStream, but it is not part of the public API.
-W****
_______________________________________________
rules-dev mailing list
rules-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev
10:06 a.m.
New subject: Today's Eleusinian mystery: deserializing a package forchange set monitoring
I'm confused (not surprising) This code worked in 5.0.1 but Lisa
indicates that it didn't work for her on 5.2 (I haven't tried it).
FileOutputStream fos = new
FileOutputStream(drlcFile);
ObjectOutputStream oos = new
ObjectOutputStream(fos);
oos.writeObject(pkg);
oos.close();
And that code does write to a file. Should this work in 5.2 or shouldn't
it?
From: rules-dev-bounces(a)lists.jboss.org
[mailto:rules-dev-bounces@lists.jboss.org] On Behalf Of Wolfgang Laun
Sent: Friday, June 17, 2011 8:59 AM
To: Rules Dev List
Subject: Re: [rules-dev] Today's Eleusinian mystery: deserializing a
package forchange set monitoring
On 17 June 2011 16:34, Joe White <Joe.White(a)recondotech.com> wrote:
Not that it necessarily needs to be fixed but in 5.0.1 you could
serialize a package just using a regular ObjectOutputStream.
No - the code was not writing anything to a file.
Also the guy
|| Lisa!
Good point. My bad.
-W
on the user mailing list was getting an exception using the
DroolsObjectOutputStream.
From: rules-dev-bounces(a)lists.jboss.org
[mailto:rules-dev-bounces@lists.jboss.org] On Behalf Of Wolfgang Laun
Sent: Friday, June 17, 2011 2:54 AM
To: Rules Dev List
Subject: [rules-dev] Today's Eleusinian mystery: deserializing a
package forchange set monitoring
Serializing a compiled package seems a rational thing to do -
after all, there is: <resource source="..." type="PKG" /> and it
is
recognized by the monitor.
However, you can't simply serialize an
org.drools.definition.KnowledgePackage as it is usually done by writing
it to an ObjectOutputStream: deserialization in the KnowledgeAgent
throws a CCE exception. To make it work, you must use a
DroolsObjectOutputStream, which is nothing but a rename of
ObjectOutputStream. So I have use DroolsObjectOutputStream, but it is
not part of the public API.
-W
_______________________________________________
rules-dev mailing list
rules-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev
10:13 a.m.
New subject: Today's Eleusinian mystery: deserializing a packageforchange set monitoring
Never mind. Just tried it and it worked with a simple rule. She must be
doing something else with it.
From: rules-dev-bounces(a)lists.jboss.org
[mailto:rules-dev-bounces@lists.jboss.org] On Behalf Of Joe White
Sent: Friday, June 17, 2011 9:06 AM
To: Rules Dev List
Subject: Re: [rules-dev] Today's Eleusinian mystery: deserializing a
packageforchange set monitoring
I'm confused (not surprising) This code worked in 5.0.1 but Lisa
indicates that it didn't work for her on 5.2 (I haven't tried it).
FileOutputStream fos = new
FileOutputStream(drlcFile);
ObjectOutputStream oos = new
ObjectOutputStream(fos);
oos.writeObject(pkg);
oos.close();
And that code does write to a file. Should this work in 5.2 or shouldn't
it?
From: rules-dev-bounces(a)lists.jboss.org
[mailto:rules-dev-bounces@lists.jboss.org] On Behalf Of Wolfgang Laun
Sent: Friday, June 17, 2011 8:59 AM
To: Rules Dev List
Subject: Re: [rules-dev] Today's Eleusinian mystery: deserializing a
package forchange set monitoring
On 17 June 2011 16:34, Joe White <Joe.White(a)recondotech.com> wrote:
Not that it necessarily needs to be fixed but in 5.0.1 you could
serialize a package just using a regular ObjectOutputStream.
No - the code was not writing anything to a file.
Also the guy
|| Lisa!
Good point. My bad.
-W
on the user mailing list was getting an exception using the
DroolsObjectOutputStream.
From: rules-dev-bounces(a)lists.jboss.org
[mailto:rules-dev-bounces@lists.jboss.org] On Behalf Of Wolfgang Laun
Sent: Friday, June 17, 2011 2:54 AM
To: Rules Dev List
Subject: [rules-dev] Today's Eleusinian mystery: deserializing a
package forchange set monitoring
Serializing a compiled package seems a rational thing to do -
after all, there is: <resource source="..." type="PKG" /> and it
is
recognized by the monitor.
However, you can't simply serialize an
org.drools.definition.KnowledgePackage as it is usually done by writing
it to an ObjectOutputStream: deserialization in the KnowledgeAgent
throws a CCE exception. To make it work, you must use a
DroolsObjectOutputStream, which is nothing but a rename of
ObjectOutputStream. So I have use DroolsObjectOutputStream, but it is
not part of the public API.
-W
_______________________________________________
rules-dev mailing list
rules-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev
10:14 a.m.
New subject: Today's Eleusinian mystery: deserializing a package forchange set monitoring
It does write to a file. You can read it back in, using an ObjectInputStream
But the KnowledgeAgent uses a DroolsObjectOutputStream for reading.
read/writeExternal of Package behave differently, depending on the 1st arg
being a DroolsObjectInput/OutputStream or an ObjectInput/OutputStream. The
latter reads/writes a byte[]; the former the members of Package.
The byte[] is a byte stream created from serializing the members of Package.
Google subject for further insight ;-)
-W
On 17 June 2011 17:06, Joe White <Joe.White(a)recondotech.com> wrote:
I’m confused (not surprising) This code worked in 5.0.1 but Lisa
indicates
that it didn’t work for her on 5.2 (I haven’t tried it).****
** **
FileOutputStream fos = new FileOutputStream(drlcFile);
****
ObjectOutputStream oos = new ObjectOutputStream(fos);*
***
oos.writeObject(pkg);****
oos.close();****
** **
** **
And that code does write to a file. Should this work in 5.2 or shouldn’t
it?****
** **
*From:* rules-dev-bounces(a)lists.jboss.org [mailto:
rules-dev-bounces(a)lists.jboss.org] *On Behalf Of *Wolfgang Laun
*Sent:* Friday, June 17, 2011 8:59 AM
*To:* Rules Dev List
*Subject:* Re: [rules-dev] Today's Eleusinian mystery: deserializing a
package forchange set monitoring****
** **
** **
On 17 June 2011 16:34, Joe White <Joe.White(a)recondotech.com> wrote:****
Not that it necessarily needs to be fixed but in 5.0.1 you could serialize
a package just using a regular ObjectOutputStream.****
No - the code was not writing anything to a file.
****
Also the guy****
|| Lisa!
****
Good point. My bad.****
-W
****
on the user mailing list was getting an exception using the
DroolsObjectOutputStream.****
****
*From:* rules-dev-bounces(a)lists.jboss.org [mailto:
rules-dev-bounces(a)lists.jboss.org] *On Behalf Of *Wolfgang Laun
*Sent:* Friday, June 17, 2011 2:54 AM
*To:* Rules Dev List
*Subject:* [rules-dev] Today's Eleusinian mystery: deserializing a package
forchange set monitoring****
****
Serializing a compiled package seems a rational thing to do - after all,
there is: <resource source="..." type="PKG" /> and it is
recognized by the
monitor.
However, you can't simply serialize an
org.drools.definition.KnowledgePackage as it is usually done by writing it
to an ObjectOutputStream: deserialization in the KnowledgeAgent throws a CCE
exception. To make it work, you must use a DroolsObjectOutputStream, which
is nothing but a rename of ObjectOutputStream. So I have use
DroolsObjectOutputStream, but it is not part of the public API.
-W****
_______________________________________________
rules-dev mailing list
rules-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev****
** **
_______________________________________________
rules-dev mailing list
rules-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev
10:22 a.m.
New subject: Today's Eleusinian mystery: deserializing a package forchange set monitoring
Ah makes sense. Got it. Thanks
From: rules-dev-bounces(a)lists.jboss.org
[mailto:rules-dev-bounces@lists.jboss.org] On Behalf Of Wolfgang Laun
Sent: Friday, June 17, 2011 9:14 AM
To: Rules Dev List
Subject: Re: [rules-dev] Today's Eleusinian mystery: deserializing a
package forchange set monitoring
It does write to a file. You can read it back in, using an
ObjectInputStream
But the KnowledgeAgent uses a DroolsObjectOutputStream for reading.
read/writeExternal of Package behave differently, depending on the 1st
arg being a DroolsObjectInput/OutputStream or an
ObjectInput/OutputStream. The latter reads/writes a byte[]; the former
the members of Package.
The byte[] is a byte stream created from serializing the members of
Package.
Google subject for further insight ;-)
-W
On 17 June 2011 17:06, Joe White <Joe.White(a)recondotech.com> wrote:
I'm confused (not surprising) This code worked in 5.0.1 but Lisa
indicates that it didn't work for her on 5.2 (I haven't tried it).
FileOutputStream fos = new
FileOutputStream(drlcFile);
ObjectOutputStream oos = new
ObjectOutputStream(fos);
oos.writeObject(pkg);
oos.close();
And that code does write to a file. Should this work in 5.2 or shouldn't
it?
From: rules-dev-bounces(a)lists.jboss.org
[mailto:rules-dev-bounces@lists.jboss.org] On Behalf Of Wolfgang Laun
Sent: Friday, June 17, 2011 8:59 AM
To: Rules Dev List
Subject: Re: [rules-dev] Today's Eleusinian mystery: deserializing a
package forchange set monitoring
On 17 June 2011 16:34, Joe White <Joe.White(a)recondotech.com> wrote:
Not that it necessarily needs to be fixed but in 5.0.1 you could
serialize a package just using a regular ObjectOutputStream.
No - the code was not writing anything to a file.
Also the guy
|| Lisa!
Good point. My bad.
-W
on the user mailing list was getting an exception using the
DroolsObjectOutputStream.
From: rules-dev-bounces(a)lists.jboss.org
[mailto:rules-dev-bounces@lists.jboss.org] On Behalf Of Wolfgang Laun
Sent: Friday, June 17, 2011 2:54 AM
To: Rules Dev List
Subject: [rules-dev] Today's Eleusinian mystery: deserializing a
package forchange set monitoring
Serializing a compiled package seems a rational thing to do -
after all, there is: <resource source="..." type="PKG" /> and it
is
recognized by the monitor.
However, you can't simply serialize an
org.drools.definition.KnowledgePackage as it is usually done by writing
it to an ObjectOutputStream: deserialization in the KnowledgeAgent
throws a CCE exception. To make it work, you must use a
DroolsObjectOutputStream, which is nothing but a rename of
ObjectOutputStream. So I have use DroolsObjectOutputStream, but it is
not part of the public API.
-W
_______________________________________________
rules-dev mailing list
rules-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev
_______________________________________________
rules-dev mailing list
rules-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev
4937
days inactive
4937
days old
6 comments
2 participants
participants (2)
-
Joe White -
Wolfgang Laun