Nah, yield() not necessary. The wait() inside of LinkedBlockingQueue.take() takes care of that. But the Thread.sleep(100) limits the CommandExecutor to only handling, at most, 10 Commands per second. Just wondering why that is. --- Mark Proctor <mproctor(a)codehaus.org&gt; wrote: > heh, habit :) Hadn't put that much thought into it, > probably for my > testing purposes, whats better a standard yield() ? > > Mark > Greg Barton wrote: > >> Just looked at it. Looks good. >> >> Just curious: why the "Thread.sleep(100)" on line >> > 39 > >> of org.drools.concurrent.CommandExecutor? >> >> --- Mark Proctor <mproctor(a)codehaus.org&gt; wrote: >> >> >> >>> Greg, >>> >>> Did you checkout what I did with the async apis >>> > in > >>> 4.0 MR2, happy I got >>> the balance and implementation right? >>> >>> Mark >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> >> >>> To unsubscribe from this list please visit: >>> >>> http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email >>> >>> >>> >>> >> >> >> >> ____________________________________________________________________________________You > snooze, you lose. Get messages ASAP with AutoCheck > >> in the all-new Yahoo! Mail Beta. >> >> http://advision.webevents.yahoo.com/mailbeta/newmail_html.html >> >> > ____________________________________________________________________________________Luggage? GPS? Comic books? Check out fitting gifts for grads at Yahoo! Search http://search.yahoo.com/search?fr=oni_on_mail&p=graduation+gifts&...