supporting ruleml is definitely a nice goal. They've started on some drools support,
although not sure how far it's gone - we'd like to help, just haven't had the
time.
We also need to find out where the gaps, overlaps and mismatches are in reaction ruleml
and drl.
Sounds like a good project for someone in the Drools community :)
mark
On 19 Mar 2013, at 20:53, kurrent93 <kurrent93(a)gmail.com> wrote:
Hi Mark and others
I'm wondering, would this be a suitable replacement for drools xml -
http://ruleml.org/reaction/
It appears to have support for temporal elements.
--
View this message in context:
http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/Drools-XML-Language-and-Tools-Developme...
Sent from the Drools: Developer (committer) mailing list mailing list archive at
Nabble.com.
_______________________________________________
rules-dev mailing list
rules-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev