Hello, are there any unintrusive (without recompiling in drools-core ;)) ways to plug own implementation of TimerService? Currently configuration is based on enumeration ClockType, which is It would be nice to be able to pass any object implementing TimerService, or some factory class. One of the reasons is that I'd like to have more control over thread pool used by JdkTimerService. Current implementation allows for unlimited number of threads, it's also not possible to share thread pool between different KnowledgeSessions thx for reply & br maciek _______________________________________________ rules-dev mailing list rules-dev(a)lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev

Hi guys, I have a question regarding the import function feature in Drools 5.1.0M. I am reading the Drools JBoss Rules 5.0 book Developer's guide by Michal Bali and tried one of the examples but somehow I couldn't get my rules work with the method that has varargs. Here's what I have (copied from page 123): public class ValidationHelper { public static void error (RuleContext kcontext, Object... context) { KnowledgeRuntime knowledgeRuntime = kcontext.getKnowledgeRuntime(); ValidationReport validationReport = (ValidationReport)knowledgeRuntime.getGlobal("validationReport"); ReportFactory reportFactory = (ReportFactory) knowledgeRuntime.getGlobal("reportFactory"); kcontext.insertLogical(reportFactory.createMessage( Message.Type.ERROR, kcontext.getRule().getName(), context)); } } then in my drools file (copied from page 42): i have import org.drools.runtime.rule.RuleContext; import function ValidationHelper.error; ... rule test when #condition then error(drools) but when I ran the test, I got error message: Exception in thread "main" org.drools.runtime.rule.ConsequenceException: [Error: unable to resolve method: ValidationHelper.error(org.drools.base.DefaultKnowledgeHelper) [arglength=1]] If I remove the parameter Object... context, then everything worked. But I do need the varargs here because I need my error message to be more specific. Did anyone else encounter the same problems? thanks! _______________________________________________ rules-dev mailing list rules-dev(a)lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev

yes my point is the varargs thing probably will not work. On Wed, Nov 4, 2009 at 4:59 AM, Jane James <jane6210(a)yahoo.com&gt; wrote: > public static void error (RuleContext kcontext, Object... context) {...} > > ===>Object... context > > > > > > ----- Original Message ---- > From: Michael Neale <michael.neale(a)gmail.com&gt; > To: Rules Dev List <rules-dev(a)lists.jboss.org&gt; > Sent: Mon, November 2, 2009 11:56:09 PM > Subject: Re: [rules-dev] is this a bug? import function not supporting varargs? > > I think there are issues with java5 syntax isms - which varargs is? > > On Tue, Nov 3, 2009 at 2:17 PM, Jane James <jane6210(a)yahoo.com&gt; wrote: >> Hi guys, >> I have a question regarding the import function feature in Drools >> 5.1.0M. >> >> I am reading the Drools JBoss Rules 5.0 book Developer's guide by Michal >> Bali and tried one of the examples but somehow I couldn't get my rules work >> with the method that has varargs. >> >> Here's what I have (copied from page 123): >> >> public class ValidationHelper { >> public static void error (RuleContext kcontext, Object... context) { >> KnowledgeRuntime knowledgeRuntime = kcontext.getKnowledgeRuntime(); >> ValidationReport validationReport = >> (ValidationReport)knowledgeRuntime.getGlobal("validationReport"); >> ReportFactory reportFactory = (ReportFactory) >> knowledgeRuntime.getGlobal("reportFactory"); >> >> kcontext.insertLogical(reportFactory.createMessage( >> Message.Type.ERROR, kcontext.getRule().getName(), >> context)); >> } >> } >> >> >> then in my drools file (copied from page 42): >> i have >> >> import org.drools.runtime.rule.RuleContext; >> import function ValidationHelper.error; >> ... >> rule test >> when >> #condition >> then >> error(drools) >> >> >> but when I ran the test, I got error message: >> >> Exception in thread "main" org.drools.runtime.rule.ConsequenceException: >> [Error: unable to resolve method: >> ValidationHelper.error(org.drools.base.DefaultKnowledgeHelper) >> [arglength=1]] >> >> If I remove the parameter Object... context, then everything worked. But I >> do need the varargs here because I need my error message to be more >> specific. >> >> Did anyone else encounter the same problems? >> >> >> thanks! >> >> _______________________________________________ >> rules-dev mailing list >> rules-dev(a)lists.jboss.org >> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev >> >> > > > > -- > Michael D Neale > home: www.michaelneale.net > blog: michaelneale.blogspot.com > > _______________________________________________ > rules-dev mailing list > rules-dev(a)lists.jboss.org > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev > > > > > _______________________________________________ > rules-dev mailing list > rules-dev(a)lists.jboss.org > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev > -- Michael D Neale home: www.michaelneale.net blog: michaelneale.blogspot.com _______________________________________________ rules-dev mailing list rules-dev(a)lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev