Re: [seam-dev] Seam 2.1.2 release

So apparently, I misremembered the outcome of this discussion (which was that not having a GA qualifier breaks all sorts of stuff), and we should go back to numbering them with the GA qualifier. Max, will it break your stuff with this no-qualifier release in there? Do we have to redo the release?

On 10 Jun 2009, at 11:48, Pete Muir wrote: > Right, but they don't reflect that we were asked to drop the GA > qualifier. So, should we add it back in? > > On 9 Jun 2009, at 23:17, Max Rydahl Andersen wrote: > >> The versioning guidelines is osgi afaik. >> >> /max >> >> Pete Muir wrote: >>> :-) >>> >>> If someone would update the JBossVersioningGuideline wiki page, >>> we'll be sure to follow it! >>> >>> On 9 Jun 2009, at 16:38, Max Rydahl Andersen wrote: >>> >>>> osgi standard is the one that actually is consistent. >>>> >>>> Maven 3 will be using osgi. >>>> >>>> Really don't think we were told to remove GA from the technical >>>> names. >>>> >>>> /max >>>> >>>> Pete Muir wrote: >>>>> Well to be maven compatible we should switch to -CRX, -BETAX etc. >>>>> >>>>> Actually, I think it was OSGi, not maven that has the problem you >>>>> describe. Anyway, we always use explicit versions (and recommend >>>>> this to people using our poms) so it should be ok... >>>>> >>>>> Do people think we should just switch to the maven standard? >>>>> >>>>> On 9 Jun 2009, at 15:12, Emmanuel Bernard wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> I thought this renaming did not apply for maven bundles as the >>>>>> maven resolution mechanism was retarded. >>>>>> >>>>>> On Jun 9, 2009, at 08:43, Pete Muir wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> Nope, JBoss has changed their versioning guidelines, and no >>>>>>> longer applies .GA to final releases... >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Going forward, there will be no more GA suffix (but we still >>>>>>> use .CRX, .BETAX etc.) >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On 9 Jun 2009, at 00:41, Asgeir Frimannsson wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> ----- "Norman Richards" <orb(a)nostacktrace.com&gt; wrote: >>>>>>>>> It's out. I'm still waiting on IT to updated the >>>>>>>>> latest/latest-2/ >>>>>>>>> latest-2.1 docs links, but otherwise the release process >>>>>>>>> should be >>>>>>>>> done. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> There seems to have been a small glitch with the naming of the >>>>>>>> 2.1.2 release in maven: >>>>>>>> http://repository.jboss.org/maven2/org/jboss/seam/jboss-seam/ >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> I would expect '2.1.2.GA' rather than '2.1.2'? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Congrats on the release! >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> cheers, >>>>>>>> asgeir >>>>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>>>> seam-dev mailing list >>>>>>>> seam-dev(a)lists.jboss.org >>>>>>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/seam-dev >>>>>>> >>>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>>> seam-dev mailing list >>>>>>> seam-dev(a)lists.jboss.org >>>>>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/seam-dev >>>>> >>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>> seam-dev mailing list >>>>> seam-dev(a)lists.jboss.org >>>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/seam-dev