Re: [seam-dev] Mercurial vs GIT

I have not tried GIT, but from what I have read it is pretty complicated to learn to use... OTOH I have tried Mercurial, which is also distributed, and found it confortable... apparently the way it deals with its distribute nature is easier for subversion users to understand... AFAIK Netbeans source code is in Mercurial, also OpenJDK... So it seems to work well with large code bases... and there are plugins for Netbeans, Eclipse and the Tortoise Hg project is advanced and usable... Google Code offers free Mercurial hosting... Why not Mercurial? Pete Muir escribió: > A quick item we discussed at the f2f meeting was whether to switch to > GIT for our SCM, rather than SVN. > > This would give us a IMO a system well suited to our distribued dev > model, it would also make it much easier for others to sandbox PEs and > then contribute them back to us. > > The proposal is to use Github to host. > > The team members at devoxx were in favour, but what do others think? > > Pete > > -- > Pete Muir > http://in.relation.to/Bloggers/Pete > _______________________________________________ > seam-dev mailing list > seam-dev(a)lists.jboss.org > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/seam-dev > >