On Thu, Jul 8, 2010 at 7:30 PM, Stuart Douglas
<stuart(a)baileyroberts.com.au>wrote:
Does anyone have any objection to adding a complete set of
AnnotationLiterals for all CDI annotations into weld-extensions?
I remember suggesting (or thinking that) at one point, so I'm for it. Though
I believe Pete said that this should be in a spec rev, that any annotation
(that would be referenced as a literal) should also define it's literals.
That was an approach Seam has started to take, I think.
-Dan
--
Dan Allen
Senior Software Engineer, Red Hat | Author of Seam in Action
Registered Linux User #231597
http://mojavelinux.com
http://mojavelinux.com/seaminaction
http://www.google.com/profiles/dan.j.allen