+1 for exceptionhandling.*
On Fri, Jul 9, 2010 at 11:54 AM, Nicklas Karlsson <nickarls(a)gmail.com>wrote:
+1 for exception. *
No extra.hierarchy.levels
On 7/9/10, Jason Porter <lightguard.jp(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> In IRC (last week I think) we talked about needing a name for the
> exception handling module (and also package name). It sounded like
> Exceptions was probably the winner in IRC, though we were a little
> torn on package naming (o.j.s.exception, o.j.s.exception.handling,
> etc). Tossing this out there for more ideas, or some sort of
> consensus.
>
> --
> Jason Porter
>
http://lightguard-jp.blogspot.com
>
http://twitter.com/lightguardjp
>
> Software Engineer
> Open Source Advocate
>
> PGP key id: 926CCFF5
> PGP key available at:
keyserver.net,
pgp.mit.edu
> _______________________________________________
> seam-dev mailing list
> seam-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/seam-dev
>
--
Sent from my mobile device
---
Nik
_______________________________________________
seam-dev mailing list
seam-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/seam-dev