Especially if one day you guys do something around CMS
On 27 févr. 2011, at 05:00, Shane Bryzak <sbryzak(a)redhat.com> wrote:
I think that the word 'content' is very overloaded. People
will see 'Seam JCR' and most will immediately recognize what it is, however
'Seam Content' is more ambiguous. My +1 is for Seam JCR, but I'm open to what
other people think.
On 27/02/11 09:44, George Gastaldi wrote:
>
> I prefer the latter also.
> seam content is also a strong name than seam jcr
>
> Em 26/02/2011, às 19:46, "John D. Ament" <john.d.ament(a)gmail.com>
escreveu:
>
>> George,
>>
>> Yes, I have basic structure that can be put into both api and impl. No test
cases right now though. We can argue over annotation names if you'd like :-)
>>
>> Shane,
>>
>> What top level package do you suggest? org.jboss.seam.jcr ?
org.jboss.seam.content ? I'd prefer the latter, especially if we do eventually look at
implementation specific features.
>>
>> John
>>
>> On Sat, Feb 26, 2011 at 5:17 PM, George Gastaldi <gegastaldi(a)gmail.com>
wrote:
>> Excelent! I am thrilled to start working on it. Shane, if you could please create
the project that would help.
>> John, do you have anything implemented to push into this repository ?
>>
>>
>>
>> Em 26/02/2011, às 18:12, Shane Bryzak <sbryzak(a)redhat.com> escreveu:
>>
>>> It's great to see this collaboration take place, and it's quite
obvious to me that the idea of a Seam JCR module would be appealing to many developers.
George and John, would you both be willing to work on this module together? For the time
being I propose that we create a Seam JCR project at github (and treat it as a sandbox for
now) which you can both commit to. I can put the basic project skeleton in place so that
it conforms in structure to the other Seam modules. What do you think?
>>>
>>> On 27/02/11 04:08, George Gastaldi wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Excelent idea. I was thinking also to connect the JCR event model to CDI.
An integration with Seam Security should also be planned.
>>>> I am also available to work on it.
>>>>
>>>> 2011/2/26 John D. Ament <john.d.ament(a)gmail.com>
>>>> George,
>>>>
>>>> Funny you bring up this topic this week. I was planning to propose a
Seam Content module this week, mostly because my schedule is finally clear enough to allow
me to work on it. At this point, I have basic capabilities to inject the necessary JCR
objects into CDI beans and that all works. I will admit though, I am a little biased
towards ModeShape as that is the other JBoss project I work on. Cross platform support
would work correctly using the service loader + repository factory approach. In addition
to basic injection support, I was also looking to provide the equivalent of a
SeamManagedPersistenceContext for JCR.
>>>>
>>>> There are also some ModeShape specific features I was bouncing around,
including CDI enabled connectors, sequencers; as well as connecting their event model w/
CDI's event model.
>>>>
>>>> What do you think about those ideas?
>>>>
>>>> John
>>>>
>>>> On Sat, Feb 26, 2011 at 10:06 AM, George Gastaldi
<gegastaldi(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> I was thinking to create a Seam JCR module to allow JCR (Java Content
>>>> Repositories) to be injected in code. It should work for jackrabbit as
>>>> well as modeshape or any other jcr 2.0 compliant implementation. Any
>>>> suggestions ? Comments appreciated.
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> seam-dev mailing list
>>>> seam-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>>>>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/seam-dev
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> seam-dev mailing list
>>>> seam-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>>>>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/seam-dev
>>>
>>
>
_______________________________________________
seam-dev mailing list
seam-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/seam-dev