I will. Thanks.
-Dan
On Tue, Mar 30, 2010 at 1:05 AM, Shane Bryzak <sbryzak(a)redhat.com> wrote:
We have some guidelines here, could you please update them Dan:
http://www.seamframework.org/Seam3/ModuleReleaseProcedure
On 30/03/10 14:10, Dan Allen wrote:
Module leads,
When doing releases, we need to align our version numbering scheme.
Currently, we are using one scheme in Maven artifacts (3.0.0-Alpha1) and one
scheme for downloads (e.g., 3.0.0.Alpha1). Personally, I wouldn't care which
one we use, as long as we use a single scheme. However, it turns out the
JBoss has recently established a guideline for version numbers and I think
we should follow suit.
http://community.jboss.org/wiki/JBossProjectVersioning
major.minor.micro.Alpha[n]
major.minor.micro.Beta[n]
major.minor.micro.CR[n]
major.minor.micro.Final
So, if there are no objections, when doing a Seam 3 module release,
please use the format 3.x.y.Qualifier[n]. There are some
other conventions suggested on that page that you may find useful.
Thanks!
-Dan
--
Dan Allen
Senior Software Engineer, Red Hat | Author of Seam in Action
Registered Linux User #231597
http://mojavelinux.com
http://mojavelinux.com/seaminaction
http://www.google.com/profiles/dan.j.allen
_______________________________________________
seam-dev mailing
listseam-dev@lists.jboss.orghttps://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/seam-dev
--
Dan Allen
Senior Software Engineer, Red Hat | Author of Seam in Action
Registered Linux User #231597