In reviewing: http://seamframework.org/Weld to get started checking out the Weld source, it took me several scans of the page to find this link: Weld, the JSR-299 RI (Reference Implementation) and the JSR-299 TCK (Technology Compatibility Kit) are being [[[[developed here]]]] <http://seamframework.org/Weld/WeldDevelopmentOverview> at seamframework.org <http://seamframework.org>;. Both are licensed under the Apache License, Version 2.0. I'd like to recommend making a "Get Involved" section more visible, since right now, that one tiny link is the only I could find.

On 19 Feb 2010, at 16:00, Jason Lee wrote: > On 2/19/10 9:57 AM, Lincoln Baxter, III wrote: > >> In reviewing: http://seamframework.org/Weld to get started checking out the Weld source, it took me several scans of the page to find this link: >> >> Weld, the JSR-299 RI (Reference Implementation) and the JSR-299 TCK (Technology Compatibility Kit) are being [[[[developed here]]]] at seamframework.org. Both are licensed under the Apache License, Version 2.0. >> >> I'd like to recommend making a "Get Involved" section more visible, since right now, that one tiny link is the only I could find. >> > I agree wholeheartedly. In fact, I'd kinda like to see the Weld and Seam information completely separated. At the moment, they're two different products, so having to sift through the info for one to get to the other is strange. And frustrating. For example, I looked high and low to find the Weld API documentation (spec and impl classes) and couldn't find it, so I ended up checking out the code and building the docs locally. That shouldn't be required, I think. > > When Seam 3 comes along and builds on top of Weld/CDI, then it might make more sense to see the information more closely together. > We are working on this :-/