In IRC (last week I think) we talked about needing a name for the exception handling module (and also package name). It sounded like Exceptions was probably the winner in IRC, though we were a little torn on package naming (o.j.s.exception, o.j.s.exception.handling, etc). Tossing this out there for more ideas, or some sort of consensus. -- Jason Porter http://lightguard-jp.blogspot.com http://twitter.com/lightguardjp Software Engineer Open Source Advocate PGP key id: 926CCFF5 PGP key available at: keyserver.net, pgp.mit.edu _______________________________________________ seam-dev mailing list seam-dev(a)lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/seam-dev

+1 for exception. * No extra.hierarchy.levels On 7/9/10, Jason Porter <lightguard.jp(a)gmail.com&gt; wrote: > In IRC (last week I think) we talked about needing a name for the > exception handling module (and also package name). It sounded like > Exceptions was probably the winner in IRC, though we were a little > torn on package naming (o.j.s.exception, o.j.s.exception.handling, > etc). Tossing this out there for more ideas, or some sort of > consensus. > > -- > Jason Porter > http://lightguard-jp.blogspot.com > http://twitter.com/lightguardjp > > Software Engineer > Open Source Advocate > > PGP key id: 926CCFF5 > PGP key available at: keyserver.net, pgp.mit.edu > _______________________________________________ > seam-dev mailing list > seam-dev(a)lists.jboss.org > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/seam-dev > -- Sent from my mobile device --- Nik _______________________________________________ seam-dev mailing list seam-dev(a)lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/seam-dev

Haha, I have one for each one of the options I've suggested, not helping :) I'll let this sit some more on the list, but the more I'm thinking about it the more I like o.j.s.exception.handling On Fri, Jul 9, 2010 at 09:57, Jordan Ganoff <jganoff(a)gmail.com&gt; wrote: > +1 for exceptionhandling.* > On Fri, Jul 9, 2010 at 11:54 AM, Nicklas Karlsson <nickarls(a)gmail.com&gt; > wrote: >> >> +1 for exception. * >> >> No extra.hierarchy.levels >> >> On 7/9/10, Jason Porter <lightguard.jp(a)gmail.com&gt; wrote: >> > In IRC (last week I think) we talked about needing a name for the >> > exception handling module (and also package name). It sounded like >> > Exceptions was probably the winner in IRC, though we were a little >> > torn on package naming (o.j.s.exception, o.j.s.exception.handling, >> > etc). Tossing this out there for more ideas, or some sort of >> > consensus. >> > >> > -- >> > Jason Porter >> > http://lightguard-jp.blogspot.com >> > http://twitter.com/lightguardjp >> > >> > Software Engineer >> > Open Source Advocate >> > >> > PGP key id: 926CCFF5 >> > PGP key available at: keyserver.net, pgp.mit.edu >> > _______________________________________________ >> > seam-dev mailing list >> > seam-dev(a)lists.jboss.org >> > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/seam-dev >> > >> >> -- >> Sent from my mobile device >> >> --- >> Nik >> _______________________________________________ >> seam-dev mailing list >> seam-dev(a)lists.jboss.org >> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/seam-dev > > > > -- > Jordan Ganoff > -- Jason Porter http://lightguard-jp.blogspot.com http://twitter.com/lightguardjp Software Engineer Open Source Advocate PGP key id: 926CCFF5 PGP key available at: keyserver.net, pgp.mit.edu _______________________________________________ seam-dev mailing list seam-dev(a)lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/seam-dev

On Sun, Jul 11, 2010 at 6:39 PM, Dan Allen <dan.j.allen(a)gmail.com&gt; wrote: > > I might suggest using a doodle to let people vote. That's how we usually > resolve these things when we need some more votes. Oh yea, the link: http://www.doodle.com/wizard/generalInformation.html?type=text -Dan -- Dan Allen Principal Software Engineer, Red Hat | Author of Seam in Action Registered Linux User #231597 http://mojavelinux.com http://mojavelinux.com/seaminaction http://www.google.com/profiles/dan.j.allen