Closer integration is the goal.
Mark.
On 27 Mar 2007, at 09:36, Tom Fennelly wrote:
Absolutely.... the only thing I can see being "unifiable"
across
these domains would be the process modeling aspects (the sexy GOP
stuff). Even at that, I think that might sound better (and easier)
in theory than practice - and totally irrelevant in many usecases
(distributed, external Services etc). I don't think I'd have
considered it as being a good idea - def not before "solving" them
in isolation first. I was just getting the impression from some of
the mails on this thread that unification was the goal - hence my
confusion/concern.
Bill Burke wrote:
>
>
> Tom Fennelly wrote:
>> If so, how will we make sure we can still support situations
>> where customers want/have a Service Orchestration solution that
>> isn't in our unified view of the world?
>>
>
> How would you do this regardless if ESB is jBPM based? You'd have
> to write inbound adapters, wouldn't you?
>
> Bill
>
_______________________________________________
esb-dev mailing list
esb-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/esb-dev