Re: [esb-dev] jca integration
Tom Fennelly wrote:
I'd already created something to fill the same role as the
ServiceInvoker. It's called MessageDeliveryAdapter
(http://anonsvn.labs.jboss.com/labs/jbossesb/trunk/product/core/listeners/...).
We should probably settle on one of these.
We'll settle on yours. Mine does not handle reply to or anything like
that. I don't remember why I didn't use yours. I'll look at the code
again.
> The <activation-config> syntax was stolen from EJB. Should
we
> simplify it? Or leave it consistent with EJB?
Not sure which I prefer. The <activation-config> is a bit verbose
alright. Is the consistency we'd be getting here really worth it?
I don't know. Maybe just concise documentation would be enough and we
can simplify
Bill
--
Bill Burke
JBoss, a division of Red Hat Inc.