;)
You should look at some WS-* specs ;-)
Mark.
On 17 May 2007, at 16:08, Tom Fennelly wrote:
"... plus encryption of data, plus a general purpose
extensibility
element"
I'm printing that one off and posting it on the wall. It's a gem :-)
Mark Little wrote:
> That was one of it's original intentions, plus encryption of data,
> plus a general purpose extensibility element.
>
> Mark.
>
>
> On 17 May 2007, at 15:40, Kurt T Stam wrote:
>
>> Yeah also with respect to:
>>
>>> just a byte array for anything that wasn't an Object, e.g., a
>>> stream in
>> for bytes, get a stream out of bytes
>>
>> Isn't everything in java an object? Is this for compatibility across
>> languages and platforms then?
>>
>> --K
>>
>> Tom Fennelly wrote:
>>> While your at that, perhaps we should provide hard examples of
>>> why/when one would attach objects to Message.Attachment Vs
>>> Message.Body. From the position of someone just using the API
>>> (Vs the
>>> author), these classes look as though they do pretty much the
>>> same thing.
>>>
>>> T.
>>>
>>> Kurt T Stam wrote:
>>>> Maybe the javadoc too then?
>>>>
>>>> Mark Little wrote:
>>>>> I'm going to update the manual then, because it's obviously
as
>>>>> clear
>>>>> as mud ;-)
>>>>>
>>>>> Mark.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On 17 May 2007, at 15:02, Kurt T Stam wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Ah that's helps :).
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Yeah what I'm after is that there need to be a way to get the
>>>>>> whole
>>>>>> thing. Sometimes you have no clue what's been set, so there
>>>>>> should be way to "Get me the whole thing".
>>>>>>
>>>>>> --K
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Mark Little wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On 17 May 2007, at 14:49, Kurt T Stam wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> There has been a lot of confusion on how to set the body
>>>>>>>> object(s), and
>>>>>>>> I think that we should get the word out that the
>>>>>>>> 'right' way of doing this is to use:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> message.getBody().add(Body.DEFAULT_NAME, your object)
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> There is no single "right" way. This is a default/
>>>>>>> convenience. The
>>>>>>> way it's supposed to happen is that the endpoints agree
(via
>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>> contract definition) where in the body specific contents go
>>>>>>> (what
>>>>>>> names, for example).
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> add(Object o) // <-- no parameter, is just for lazy
>>>>>>> developers ;-)
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> The thing I don't really understand is why
getByteArray
>>>>>>>> does not
>>>>>>>> stream
>>>>>>>> all the objects into the ByteArray? I guess I don't
really
>>>>>>>> understand
>>>>>>>> why we have the "_content" in addition to it;
taken from the
>>>>>>>> BodyImpl class:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Because that's the definition of getByteArray. It's
not
>>>>>>> meant to
>>>>>>> be the entire contents of the message, just a byte array for
>>>>>>> anything that wasn't an Object, e.g., a stream in for
bytes,
>>>>>>> get a
>>>>>>> stream out of bytes. But not mutually exclusive to the named
>>>>>>> objects, attachments etc.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> What you're after would probably be: getBodyAsByteArray
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Mark.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> public BodyImpl()
>>>>>>>> {
>>>>>>>> _content = null;
>>>>>>>> _objects = new Hashtable<String,
Object>();
>>>>>>>> }
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Thx,
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> --Kurt
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>>> esb-dev mailing list
>>>>>>>> esb-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
<mailto:esb-dev@lists.jboss.org>
>>>>>>>>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/esb-dev
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> ----
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Mark Little
>>>>>>> mlittle(a)redhat.com <mailto:mlittle@redhat.com>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> JBoss, a Division of Red Hat
>>>>>>> Registered Address: Red Hat UK Ltd, Amberley Place, 107-111
>>>>>>> Peascod Street, Windsor, Berkshire, SI4 1TE, United Kingdom.
>>>>>>> Registered in UK and Wales under Company Registration No.
>>>>>>> 3798903
>>>>>>> Directors: Michael Cunningham (USA), Charlie Peters (USA)
and
>>>>>>> David Owens (Ireland)
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> ----
>>>>>
>>>>> Mark Little
>>>>> mlittle(a)redhat.com <mailto:mlittle@redhat.com>
>>>>>
>>>>> JBoss, a Division of Red Hat
>>>>> Registered Address: Red Hat UK Ltd, Amberley Place, 107-111
>>>>> Peascod
>>>>> Street, Windsor, Berkshire, SI4 1TE, United Kingdom.
>>>>> Registered in
>>>>> UK and Wales under Company Registration No. 3798903 Directors:
>>>>> Michael Cunningham (USA), Charlie Peters (USA) and David Owens
>>>>> (Ireland)
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>> ------
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> esb-dev mailing list
>>>> esb-dev(a)lists.jboss.org <mailto:esb-dev@lists.jboss.org>
>>>>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/esb-dev
>>>>
>>>
>>
>
> ----
>
> Mark Little
> mlittle(a)redhat.com <mailto:mlittle@redhat.com>
>
> JBoss, a Division of Red Hat
> Registered Address: Red Hat UK Ltd, Amberley Place, 107-111
> Peascod Street, Windsor, Berkshire, SI4 1TE, United Kingdom.
> Registered in UK and Wales under Company Registration No. 3798903
> Directors: Michael Cunningham (USA), Charlie Peters (USA) and
> David Owens (Ireland)
>
>
>
>
--
Red Hat:
Registered Address: Red Hat Ltd, Brian O' Donnell and Partners, 62
Merrion Square, Dublin 2, Ireland.
Registered in the Companies Registration Office, Parnell House, 14
Parnell Square, Dublin 1, Ireland, at No. 304873
Directors: Charlie Peters (USA), Michael Cunningham (USA). David
Owens, Brendan Lane
----
Mark Little
mlittle(a)redhat.com
JBoss, a Division of Red Hat
Registered Address: Red Hat UK Ltd, Amberley Place, 107-111 Peascod
Street, Windsor, Berkshire,
SI4 1TE, United Kingdom.
Registered in UK and Wales under Company Registration No. 3798903
Directors: Michael Cunningham (USA), Charlie Peters (USA) and David
Owens (Ireland)