December 2006 - jboss-dev-forums - Jboss List Archives

[Design of JBossCache] - Re: Serialization Compatibility Tests

by pavel.tsekov＠redhat.com

Sorry, an entry in the database looks like this: org.jboss.aop.pointcut.ast.ParseException 6640507307072022813 View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3995326#3995326 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3995326

19 years, 3 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss jBPM] - Re: JTA integration

by jeffdelong

I am confused. I have used jBPM in a JTA environment since last March at least, using the following configuration in the jbpm.cfg.xml file: | <service name="persistence"> | <factory> | <bean class="org.jbpm.persistence.db.DbPersistenceServiceFactory"> | <field name="isTransactionEnabled"><false/></field> | </bean> | </factory> | </service> | | With this configuration, the jbpmContext.close does not commit the transaction or close the Hibernate session. As for using the Hibernate session with jBPM, it would be nice for jbpm to use the sessionFactory.getCurrentSession() method. In the past I have injected the Hibernate session into jBPM using jbpmContext.setSession(s); View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3995325#3995325 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3995325

19 years, 3 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBossCache] - Re: Serialization Compatibility Tests

by pavel.tsekov＠redhat.com

I've changed the code to utilize java.beans.XMLEncoder since it seemed appropriate. I produces something like that: org.jboss.aop.pointcut.ast.ParseException 6640507307072022813 Now, do we really want a single XML file for all previous releases or you can live with one file for a release ? I think that creating a single file for all releases will complicate the tool without any real advantages. Well, there are some advantages - the fact that we need to validate against j2se 1.4 and 1.5 will double the number of produced files so if we have a single file repository we'll only have two files. Please, advise. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3995324#3995324 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3995324

19 years, 3 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of EJB 3.0] - java:comp.ejb3 versus java:comp

by wolfc

Specs require us to have java:comp as our enc name. But currently EJB3 binds all entries under java:comp.ejb3. How are we going to fix this? In org.jboss.naming.NamingService org.jboss.naming.ENCFactory is bound under java:comp. This is a per classloader enc ObjectFactory. In org.jboss.ejb3.EJB3Deployer org.jboss.ejb3.ThreadLocalENCFactory is bound under java:comp.ejb3. This is a per thread enc ObjectFactory. I was thinking about creating a new ObjectFactory which delegates to either one of them and binding it in the EJB3Deployer, but that's probably nasty. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3995322#3995322 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3995322

19 years, 3 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss jBPM] - JTA integration

by tom.baeyens＠jboss.com

There has been an email discussion about jBPM's JTA integration. anonymous wrote : I am referring to the fact that Hibernate needs to be flushed in beforeCompletion(), and closed in afterCompletion(), which is currently impossible because everything happens in the close() method. | ________________________________ | | From: Tom Baeyens | Sent: Thursday, December 14, 2006 5:05 AM | To: Gavin King | Cc: Dev - jBPM | Subject: RE: jBPM *still* unusable in JTA environment | | we have fixed this in head, but it is not yet backported to 3.1 branch. | | at least, if you are referring to the capability of using the hibernate current session. | ________________________________ | | From: Gavin King | Sent: Thu 12/14/2006 6:25 AM | To: Dev - jBPM | Subject: jBPM *still* unusable in JTA environment | | Guys, when are we going to get this fixed? It's been a long time since I raised this really major issue. I now have added a configuration property to jBPM 3.1 to get this behaviour: a) when a jbpm needs a hibernate session, it uses SessionFactory.getCurrentSession() b) at jbpmContext.close(), jbpm does not do anything with the hibernate session. no flush and no close. Do you need the flush method to be exposed too ? Eventually i want to add it, but doing that in 3.1.x might be tricky. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3995305#3995305 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3995305

19 years, 3 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design the new POJO MicroContainer] - JBMICROCONT-132 todo?

by alesj

anonymous wrote : | When the ValueConvertor can't find a property editor it falls back to looking for | a constructor with a single String parameter. | | This is probably not correct in some cases. | | It should be looking for a static toValue(String) before looking for the constructor. What's there to do? This is already in the ValueConvertor class. | improve <init>(String) might not be relevent? | Should we relax the String.class constraint for the value class, and just use whatever value's class type is. Or using the same String.class contraint with constructor on the value.toString() View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3995285#3995285 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3995285

19 years, 3 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss Internal Benchmarking] - Changes required for using the pooled invoker from the exist

by mahendra_kutare

anonymous wrote : | | I have made the changes to conf/jboss-service.xml and also to standardjboss.xml to use pooled invoker. What puzzles me is if i comment out UNIFIED INVOKER and the CONFIGURATION in jboss-service.xml all of the SPECJ ejb jars deployment fails. | | Can anyone explain this or experience this with SPECjAppServer2004 ? | | I am using FC5, SPECjAppServer2004 and MySQL 5.0.8 for my setup. | | Also my change for POOLED INVOKER to standardjboss.xml differs from entity-rmi-invoker using UNIFIED INVOKER only in the making the following line - | | <invoker-mbean>jboss:service=invoker,type=unified</invoker-mbean> | | to | | <invoker-mbean>jboss:service=invoker,type=pooled</invoker-mbean> | | I would like to know if all client and server interceptors from UNIFIED invoker be still valid for POOLED INVOKER - | | <invoker-proxy-binding> | entity-rmi-invoker | <invoker-mbean>jboss:service=invoker,type=POOLED</invoker-mbean> | <proxy-factory>org.jboss.proxy.ejb.ProxyFactory</proxy-factory> | <proxy-factory-config> | <client-interceptors> | | org.jboss.proxy.ejb.HomeInterceptor | org.jboss.proxy.SecurityInterceptor | org.jboss.proxy.TransactionInterceptor | <interceptor call-by-value="false">org.jboss.invocation.InvokerInterceptor | <interceptor call-by-value="true">org.jboss.invocation.MarshallingInvokerInterceptor | | | org.jboss.proxy.ejb.EntityInterceptor | org.jboss.proxy.SecurityInterceptor | org.jboss.proxy.TransactionInterceptor | <interceptor call-by-value="false">org.jboss.invocation.InvokerInterceptor | <interceptor call-by-value="true">org.jboss.invocation.MarshallingInvokerInterceptor | | <list-entity> | org.jboss.proxy.ejb.ListEntityInterceptor | org.jboss.proxy.SecurityInterceptor | org.jboss.proxy.TransactionInterceptor | <interceptor call-by-value="false">org.jboss.invocation.InvokerInterceptor | <interceptor call-by-value="true">org.jboss.invocation.MarshallingInvokerInterceptor | </list-entity> | </client-interceptors> | </proxy-factory-config> | </invoker-proxy-binding> | View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3995280#3995280 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3995280

19 years, 3 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss jBPM] - Re: Change Process Definition!!

by kukeltje

Wrong forum View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3995243#3995243 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3995243

19 years, 3 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss jBPM] - Re: Why no 3.0.12 version src of gpd on anonyCVS??

by tom.baeyens＠jboss.com

maybe it's because the sources have moved. look at jbpm.3/designer View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3995237#3995237 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3995237

19 years, 3 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss jBPM] - Re: deploying to jboss in development

by tom.baeyens＠jboss.com

a simple unzip and overwrite of the jbpm deployment configuration is definitely a good idea. the current targets need to remain, though. because for reproducing bugs, it is vital that we use the exact same set up. these targets are able to start from unzipping a jboss.zip file and then deploying jbpm from the sources in there. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3995236#3995236 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3995236

19 years, 3 months

1
0
0 / 0

2026

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

jboss-dev-forums December 2006