November 2008 - jboss-dev-forums - Jboss List Archives

[Design of Messaging on JBoss (Messaging/JBoss)] - Re: 1.4.1.GA ready

by gaohoward

Another issue is the jbossts lib, in JBM we are using jbossts14, which i think is jbossts lib built with java 1.4. JBoss AS 5 just uses jbossts (i think it is compiled with java 15), should we drop the 1.4 stuff ? View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4190448#4190448 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4190448

17 years, 4 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JCA on JBoss] - Re: JcaXAResourceRecovery

by jhalliday

Hi Jesper What's the status on this? I don't see the datasource deployers using the new API to register for recovery yet. Is it still planned for AS 5.0.GA or coming later? View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4190445#4190445 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4190445

17 years, 4 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of Messaging on JBoss (Messaging/JBoss)] - Re: connection factories and connection params

by timfox

What about system property substitution? ${host_name}? View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4190423#4190423 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4190423

17 years, 4 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of Messaging on JBoss (Messaging/JBoss)] - Re: connection factories and connection params

by ataylor

anonymous wrote : | But acceptor params != connector params thats correct, but if i need to change say the host name, currently i need to change it in about 10 places, which i think is not very user friendly. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4190421#4190421 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4190421

17 years, 4 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss jBPM] - Re: API first cut available for jBPM3

by koen.aers＠jboss.com

"thomas" wrote : From your comments, and again I am grateful for those, I take it can stay as is. +1 Change is (sometimes) good, but it should not lead to confusion. Cheers, Koen View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4190408#4190408 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4190408

17 years, 4 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of Messaging on JBoss (Messaging/JBoss)] - Re: hourly builds on hudson

by timfox

Yeah, the continue test is deliberate. As I say it helps us catch race conditions and other intermittent errors that might only show up in 100 runs. This has already shown up quite a few intermittent and difficult to catch issues. You could ask Alex if he'd liked to add a feature to Hudson to show you the last changes without having to click back through previous builds. That would be useful. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4190403#4190403 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4190403

17 years, 4 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of Messaging on JBoss (Messaging/JBoss)] - Re: 1.4.1.GA ready

by timfox

"dimitris(a)jboss.org" wrote : for jbossas/core-libs you should be compiling against the latest 5.0.0.CR2 artifacts. Indeed, I'm not sure how this slipped through the net :( View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4190399#4190399 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4190399

17 years, 4 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of Messaging on JBoss (Messaging/JBoss)] - Re: 1.4.1.GA ready

by dimitris＠jboss.org

for jbossas/core-libs you should be compiling against the latest 5.0.0.CR2 artifacts. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4190398#4190398 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4190398

17 years, 4 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of Messaging on JBoss (Messaging/JBoss)] - Re: 1.4.1.GA ready

by timfox

"gaohoward" wrote : Some third-party lib is not consistent with latest jboss5 trunk: | | sun-javacc: jboss5 -- 4.0 jbm -- 3.2 | jboss/common-core: jboss5 -- 2.2.10 jbm -- 2.2.8.GA | jboss/common-logging-jdk: jboss5 -- 2.0.5.GA jbm -- 2.0.2.GA | jboss/common-logging-log4j: jboss5 -- 2.0.5.GA jbm -- 2.0.2GA | jboss/common-logging-spi: jboss5 -- 2.0.5.GA jbm -- 2.0.2GA | jboss/jboss-mdr: jboss5 -- 2.0.1.GA jbm-- 2.0.0.Beta12 | jboss/jbossts: jboss5 -- 4.4.0.GA jbm -- 4.2.3.SP7 | jbossas/core-libs: jboss5 -- not found jbm -- 4.2.0.GA | | I'll try to update them | Good catch Howard :) Clebert - I thought you already checked the dependencies? What happened? View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4190392#4190392 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4190392

17 years, 4 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss jBPM] - Re: API first cut available for jBPM3

by thomas.diesler＠jboss.com

anonymous wrote : | These methods are in our case 'hidden' in a Process Access Object | Many folks will use the API directly as documented by the CTS test cases and the documentation itself. >From your comments, and again I am grateful for those, I take it can stay as is. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4190391#4190391 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4190391

17 years, 4 months

1
0
0 / 0

2026

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

jboss-dev-forums November 2008