November 2008 - jboss-dev-forums - Jboss List Archives

[Design of Messaging on JBoss (Messaging/JBoss)] - Re: 1.4.1.GA ready

by clebert.suconic＠jboss.com

I guess it's going to be hard to substitute jbossts on our thirdparty also. that's probably bringing other dependencies from jboss5 (I remember something doing something around that)? If you can do it easily fine.. if you can't I would add that to the ignore list, but we should get an input from Tim first. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4190385#4190385 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4190385

17 years, 4 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of Messaging on JBoss (Messaging/JBoss)] - Re: 1.4.1.GA ready

by clebert.suconic＠jboss.com

"gaohoward" wrote : Some third-party lib is not consistent with latest jboss5 trunk: | | sun-javacc: jboss5 -- 4.0 jbm -- 3.2 | jboss/common-core: jboss5 -- 2.2.10 jbm -- 2.2.8.GA | jboss/common-logging-jdk: jboss5 -- 2.0.5.GA jbm -- 2.0.2.GA | jboss/common-logging-log4j: jboss5 -- 2.0.5.GA jbm -- 2.0.2GA | jboss/common-logging-spi: jboss5 -- 2.0.5.GA jbm -- 2.0.2GA | jboss/jboss-mdr: jboss5 -- 2.0.1.GA jbm-- 2.0.0.Beta12 | jboss/jbossts: jboss5 -- 4.4.0.GA jbm -- 4.2.3.SP7 | jbossas/core-libs: jboss5 -- not found jbm -- 4.2.0.GA | | I'll try to update them | Just ignore sun-javacc, jboss/common, jboss/jboss-mdr. They are the equivalent to jbossas/core-libs. It would be better to replace them... but they are not critical. We could do it later. But I'm not sure about jbossts though. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4190383#4190383 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4190383

17 years, 4 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBoss Remoting, Unified Invokers] - Re: Remoting 3: RFC: Simple load balancers

by trustin

I thought everything could go to the core actually. What interfaces should be in the API module? We could start from simple (prehaps random and ordered?) round-robin, and then the weighted one. Just a simple one should be enough to prove the concept IMHO. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4190382#4190382 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4190382

17 years, 4 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of Messaging on JBoss (Messaging/JBoss)] - Re: Netty HTTP transport

by trustin

Looks great! I've just merged it into the trunk. Let me release 3.1.0.ALPHA1 which contains the HTTP codec + some demanded features this week. Thank you for your effort. :) View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4190379#4190379 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4190379

17 years, 4 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of Messaging on JBoss (Messaging/JBoss)] - Re: 1.4.1.GA ready

by gaohoward

Some third-party lib is not consistent with latest jboss5 trunk: sun-javacc: jboss5 -- 4.0 jbm -- 3.2 jboss/common-core: jboss5 -- 2.2.10 jbm -- 2.2.8.GA jboss/common-logging-jdk: jboss5 -- 2.0.5.GA jbm -- 2.0.2.GA jboss/common-logging-log4j: jboss5 -- 2.0.5.GA jbm -- 2.0.2GA jboss/common-logging-spi: jboss5 -- 2.0.5.GA jbm -- 2.0.2GA jboss/jboss-mdr: jboss5 -- 2.0.1.GA jbm-- 2.0.0.Beta12 jboss/jbossts: jboss5 -- 4.4.0.GA jbm -- 4.2.3.SP7 jbossas/core-libs: jboss5 -- not found jbm -- 4.2.0.GA I'll try to update them View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4190329#4190329 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4190329

17 years, 4 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of POJO Server] - Re: ProfileService Guidance

by scott.stark＠jboss.org

This should be working in trunk for you now. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4190308#4190308 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4190308

17 years, 4 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of POJO Server] - Re: return type for ManagedProperty.getValue()

by scott.stark＠jboss.org

Yes, I don't see any reason to be unambiguous that MetaValues are the only value types that should be in the management api. This means setValue(Serializable) should also change, as well as ManagedParameter. https://jira.jboss.org/jira/browse/JBMAN-36 View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4190294#4190294 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4190294

17 years, 4 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of POJO Server] - Re: NotSerializableException: CompositeValueInvocationHandle

by scott.stark＠jboss.org

Definitely a bug introduced in a recent jboss metatype change. I have created: https://jira.jboss.org/jira/browse/JBMAN-35 to look into it, but I'm not sure this should be Serializable and therefore in the ds attachment. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4190292#4190292 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4190292

17 years, 4 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of Security on JBoss] - Re: Security Cache Flush on Http Session Expiration

by clevelam

when i enable the filter for : PrincipalSessionAttributeFilter I never get forwarded to my actual page and a black screen gets displayed on the browser. Is this correct behavior???? I'm using a spring MVC application. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4190290#4190290 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4190290

17 years, 4 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of POJO Server] - return type for ManagedProperty.getValue()

by ips

When I spoke with him last Friday, Scott agreed that ManagedOperation.invoke() should return MetaValue, rather than a java.lang.Object. Should ManagedProperty.getValue() also return MetaValue, rather than java.lang.Object? View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4190281#4190281 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4190281

17 years, 4 months

1
0
0 / 0

2026

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

jboss-dev-forums November 2008