January 2009 - jboss-dev-forums - Jboss List Archives

[Design of Messaging on JBoss (Messaging/JBoss)] - Re: JMS Adapters for JBM 2 Bridge

by jmesnil

ok, now I'm the one who is confused. Do we keep the bridge service as it is? It means that we must depend on JBoss AS 5 and the JMX microkernel to have it work. I thought that we'd also want to have bridge when running JBM2 standalone. In that case, JBoss microcontainer'd be used to wire the JMS provider adapters. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4200063#4200063 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4200063

17 years, 2 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of Messaging on JBoss (Messaging/JBoss)] - Re: JMS Adapters for JBM 2 Bridge

by timfox

I still don't follow, JMSProviderAdapters still exist in AS 5 AFAIK, so I don't see why anything needs to change. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4200062#4200062 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4200062

17 years, 2 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of Messaging on JBoss (Messaging/JBoss)] - Re: JMS Adapters for JBM 2 Bridge

by jmesnil

Let me clarify a little bit. I'm not changing the Bridge class. I'm changing the BridgeService. in JBM 1.4, the BridgeService uses the JMX microkernel to get information on the JMS providers. in JBM 2, the Microcontainer will be used to do that. The only update for JBM2 is how I retrieve this information. Otherwise, I've not touched the bridge code. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4200059#4200059 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4200059

17 years, 2 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of Messaging on JBoss (Messaging/JBoss)] - Re: JMS Adapters for JBM 2 Bridge

by timfox

I don't understand why you need to make any changes to the bridge to make it work with JBM 2.0. The bridge should work with any JMS 1.1 compliant provider. What am I missing here? View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4200057#4200057 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4200057

17 years, 2 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of Messaging on JBoss (Messaging/JBoss)] - JMS Adapters for JBM 2 Bridge

by jmesnil

I'm currently updating our BridgeService to make it work with JBM 2. One of the task is to change the way we created JMS managed resources for the bridge's source and target (we no longer require the adapters to be registered in JMX). In my local box, I've got a simple class JMSProviderAdapter which is instantiated by JBoss Microcontainer. The Bridge & adapters configuration looks like: | <bean name="Bridge" class="org.jboss.messaging.jms.bridge.BridgeService"> | <constructor> | <parameter>TestBridge</parameter> | <parameter> | <inject bean="JMSManagementService"/> | </parameter> | </constructor> | <property name="sourceProvider"> | <inject bean="JBM_2_Provider"/> | </property> | <property name="targetProvider"> | <inject bean="JBM_2_Provider"/> | </property> | <property name="sourceDestinationLookup">/queue/A</property> | <property name="targetDestinationLookup">/queue/B</property> | <property name="failureRetryInterval">-1</property> | <property name="maxRetries">-1</property> | <property name="maxBatchSize">1</property> | <property name="maxBatchTime">-1</property> | <property name="qualityOfServiceMode">2</property> | <property name="transactionManager"> | <inject bean="TransactionManager" /> | </property> | </bean> | | <bean name="JBM_2_Provider" class="org.jboss.messaging.jms.bridge.JMSProviderAdapter"> | <constructor> | <parameter>JBoss Messaging 2 Adapter</parameter> | <parameter> | <map class="java.util.Properties" keyClass="java.lang.String" valueClass="java.lang.String"> | <entry> | <key>java.naming.factory.initial</key> | <value>org.jnp.interfaces.NamingContextFactory</value> | </entry> | <entry> | <key>java.naming.provider.url</key> | <value>jnp://localhost:1099</value> | </entry> | <entry> | <key>java.naming.factory.url.pkgs</key> | <value>org.jboss.naming:org.jnp.interfaces"</value> | </entry> | </map> | </parameter> | <parameter>/ConnectionFactory</parameter> | </constructor> | </bean> | | <bean name="TransactionManager" class="com.arjuna.ats.internal.jta.transaction.arjunacore.TransactionManagerImple"> | </bean> | With this kind of configuration, I was able to bridge a JBM 1.4 source to a JBM 2 target (the bridge was hosted in the JBM2 server). For each type of provider, you must add a bean description with all the JNDI properties required to lookup its JMS managed resources. Then all the class must be in JBM 2 classpath when it is started. I'm not familiar with JBM 1.4 Bridge configurations and I wanted to be sure that this way to configure JBM2 Bridge adapter is sufficient enough to cover all the cases. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4200055#4200055 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4200055

17 years, 2 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBossXB] - Re: 2 root elements question

by alex.loubyansky＠jboss.com

XML schema can contain multiple top-level/root elements. The corresponding classes have to be annotated with @XmlRootElement. The problem is at the moment JBossXBBuilder (which is a SchemaBinding producer) takes only one class (which may reference other classes annotated with @XmlRootElement). Until support for binding a set of classes to the same SchemaBinding is supported, there could be a few workarounds/hacks: - just introduce an artificial class (which doesn't have to have a representation in the xsd) that would reference your top-level classes; - build separate SchemaBinding's for datasources and connection-factories and then merge them into one. The first one should be easier. Adding support for that to JBossXBBuilder should not be a problem as well. I am not sure whether JAXB defines a standard way to do that. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4200046#4200046 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4200046

17 years, 2 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of JBossXB] - 2 root elements question

by alex.loubyansky＠jboss.com

"Jeff" wrote : Here I have a question. | For ds.xml, there are 2 root elements defined in the DTD file jboss-ds_5_0.dtd | "datasources" and "connection-factories". | How can I handle these in our metadata project? | | And if we want use xsd file to re-define ds.xml, we must change it into single root XML document tree, right? | I would like to add an element to wrap them as new root element, but I am concerned for compatibility with Jboss old version. | Do you have good idea? | | Thanks | Jeff View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4200041#4200041 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4200041

17 years, 2 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of Messaging on JBoss (Messaging/JBoss)] - Re: Getting the Address from QueueImpl?

by timfox

If you're looking at closng the remaining paging and large message replication issues, can you start by outlining the issues on this forum (you can start a new thread) and we can decide on the best solution. IIRC the oustanding issues are 1) Large message replication. You added some custom replication that I thought was unnecessary. This needs to be looked at again 2) Replication with paging messages. Anything else? View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4200032#4200032 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4200032

17 years, 2 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of Messaging on JBoss (Messaging/JBoss)] - Re: Getting the Address from QueueImpl?

by timfox

Sounds like you're already implementing one of the solutions we discussed. However, I'm not sure we decided on that solution (keep depaging until the reference is found). Like I said yesterday, please *discuss* before jumping in with solutions. The depage solution can lead to OOM and may not be desirable. The other solutions we discussed were maintaining ordering. View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4200023#4200023 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4200023

17 years, 2 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Design of Messaging on JBoss (Messaging/JBoss)] - Re: Getting the Address from QueueImpl?

by timfox

Hmm, can't you just prompt a depage as normal? View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4200018#4200018 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4200018

17 years, 2 months

1
0
0 / 0

2026

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

jboss-dev-forums January 2009