thanks a lot for looking at this. I'll take your feedback back to the
EEG, which will meet in Dublin next week.
On 07/17/2009 07:03 PM, Anil Saldhana wrote:
> the JAAS proposal looks to be in line with the general JAAS practices
> in the SE and EE world.
> I had some doubts about how the Class.forName loading of the LM will
> work with the OSGi Classloaders in play. But that is how the JDK loads
> the modules as well in the LoginContext class. Scott, do you see any
> issues here?
> The proposal also takes care of installing/uninstalling JAAS
> configuration at deployment level. So that takes care of our needs as well.
> Thomas Diesler wrote:
>> Please don't forget that EEG documents can be circulated internally only.
>> On 07/15/2009 10:55 AM, Thomas Diesler wrote:
>>> Hi Scott/Anil,
>>> attached is document that is currently discussed by the OSGi EEG.
>>> Perhaps you like to review and provide feedback that I can take with me
>>> to the next F2F in Dublin (27-29,Jul-2009).
>>> Especially Section 5 (Requirements) is where we ma be able to add JBoss
>>> specific requirements.
> jboss-development mailing list
JBoss, a division of Red Hat
2009 Red Hat Summit and JBoss World.
Chicago. September 1-4, 2009.
attached is document that is currently discussed by the OSGi EEG.
Perhaps you like to review and provide feedback that I can take with me
to the next F2F in Dublin (27-29,Jul-2009).
Especially Section 5 (Requirements) is where we ma be able to add JBoss