Re: [rules-dev] Semantic Web Drools Module, Request for Feedbak

So some support in -core would be needed? Or could this be done as an optional module or 2? drools-semweb (and submodules perhaps??)

On Tue, Oct 20, 2009 at 12:33 AM, Mark Proctor <mproctor(a)codehaus.org&gt; wrote: > The way I'd do this is to build native support into drools for description > logic, using terminology used in OWL-DL. I'd then look to something like the > Manchester syntax, or variation of, for the textual representation. Once I > have that working I'd look into GUI authoring and transation (RueML etc) to > and from that. > > Mark > Xavier Breton wrote: > > Hi, > > I'm looking for feedback, I'll develop a Semantic Web Drools Module that > will be the subject of my Master Degree Tesis. > > The idea is to use Eclipse Modelling Framework (EMF) for prototyping and > follow a Model Driven Architecture (MDA) where the source language is > Semantic of Business Vocabularies and Business Rules (SBVR) and the target > language is Drools DRL. > > The mapping could be (PIM level): > - Semantic Web Rule Language (SWRL) > - Ontology Web Language (OWL) > - RuleML > - Rule Interchange Format (RIF) > - REWERSE Rule Markup Language (R2ML) > > It could be added to the module at the source UML or Entity Relationship > like models to transform the models into SBVR. > > Regards > > Xavier Breton > > ________________________________ > _______________________________________________ > rules-dev mailing list > rules-dev(a)lists.jboss.org > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev > > > _______________________________________________ > rules-dev mailing list > rules-dev(a)lists.jboss.org > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev > > >