[rules-dev] Drools ReteOO versus Rete

Depending on your number of rules and facts, that amount of memory will likely be a concern. If I had memory requirements like that I would honestly look a clips. -Michael On Aug 13, 2009, at 2:19 AM, Thomas Frenken <Thomas.Frenken(a)offis.de&gt; wrote: > Hello, > > I am interested in running Drools 5 (and especially Drools Fusion) > on a >>> somehow<< resource-constrained device for which only a J2SE 1.4 VM >>> ist > available. > > Since Drools meanwhile requires J2SE 1.5 I thought about backporting > it. > But before I invest so much effort, I got two questions: > > 1) I have downloaded the sourcecode. At a first glance the only > reason for > requiering J2SE 1.5 is the extensive use of generics. In case I would > remove all generics from the code, would it be possible to compile > drools > for a J2SE 1.4 VM runtime in general or are there other more hidden > reasons for requiering J2SE 1.5? > 2) I already meantioned I am planning to run drools on a >>somehow<< > resourcen-constrained device. I explicitly used the term >>somehow<< > because I am talking of a device with a 400 Mhz CPU and 256 MB RAM > (some > people might laugh about calling this resource-constrained). How > about > resource-consumption of drools? Has anyone run drools on a device > with > similar resources? > > Thanks in advance! > > Best Regards > Thomas Frenken > > _______________________________________________ > rules-dev mailing list > rules-dev(a)lists.jboss.org > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev _______________________________________________ rules-dev mailing list rules-dev(a)lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev