Re: [rules-dev] Inferred expiration offset: does it really work?

I have tried declare EventA   @role( event )   x : Void end declare EventB   @role( event )   x : Void end rule "mock-A"  # only rule for EventA, EventB when     $b: EventB()     $a: EventA( this after[0,10s] $b ) then end and     org.drools.rule.TypeDeclaration tda = (org.drools.rule.TypeDeclaration)rpkg.pkg.getTypeDeclaration( "EventA" );     System.out.println( "EventA expires: " + tda.getExpirationOffset() + " role:" + tda.getRole());     org.drools.rule.TypeDeclaration tdb = (org.drools.rule.TypeDeclaration)rpkg.pkg.getTypeDeclaration( "EventB" );     System.out.println( "EventB expires: " + tdb.getExpirationOffset() + " role:" + tdb.getRole()); which prints    EventA expires: -1 role:EVENT    EventB expires: -1 role:EVENT Since the DRL code is equivalent to example 2.19 ("correlate orders") in Fusion, this raises the question whether the inferred expiration offset is actually computed as described. -W _______________________________________________ rules-dev mailing list rules-dev(a)lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev