[rules-dev] Eponymous class confusion?

Is this intentional or just the aftermath of past evolution? I don't see the point of having two defaults. org.drools.base.DefaultConsequenceExceptionHandler org.drools.runtime.rule.impl.DefaultConsequenceExceptionHandler and, thrown from these: org.drools.spi.ConsequenceException org.drools.runtime.rule.ConsequenceException Cheers -W