On 19 September 2011 17:57, Mauricio Salatino <salaboy(a)gmail.com> wrote:
Hi Jiri,
Drools Verifier do that for you? Am I right?
I think this is a misunderstanding. Looking at Drools' Java code takes a
Java bug finding program such as findbugs. What Drools Verifier does is:
look at DRL code written by Drools users.
Findbugs applied to Drools code is a good idea, but I would opt for this to
include fundamental code that's *used *by Drools and responsible for a
considerable number of JIRAs.
-W
Toni Rikkola is the man behind drools verifier, you can talk with him
to
improve what he has now. I know that Esteban was also playing with that and
adding the concept of Working Set. You can talk with him as well.
Cheers
On Mon, Sep 19, 2011 at 12:43 PM, Ansgar Konermann <
ansgar.konermann(a)googlemail.com> wrote:
> If I'm eligible to vote, please go for option 1.
> Am 19.09.2011 17:14 schrieb "Jiri Svitak" <jsvitak(a)redhat.com>:
>
> _______________________________________________
> rules-dev mailing list
> rules-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev
>
>
--
- CTO @
http://www.plugtree.com
- MyJourney @
http://salaboy.wordpress.com
- Co-Founder @
http://www.jugargentina.org
- Co-Founder @
http://www.jbug.com.ar
- Salatino "Salaboy" Mauricio -
_______________________________________________
rules-dev mailing list
rules-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev