Re: [rules-dev] ActivationCancelledEvent / ActivationCancelledCause
On 4 August 2010 10:51, Mark Proctor <mproctor(a)codehaus.org> wrote:
CLEAR is the result of a forced cancellation of an activation, either be
explicitely calling clear or removing a rule.
I agree we could probably split that out and have a KB_MODIFY, so that if
the activation is cancelled as a result the rule being removed we get a
different event.
Just wanted to point this out - removing rules is not what *we* here need to
do. It probably only matters when you want to write a nit-picking event
logger.
-W
Mark
Is this intentional?
-W
Attachments:
- attachment.html (text/html — 1.2 KB)