Re: [rules-dev] cr1

Hi, I will make the 5.5.x branch today. These are the current issues.... * http://hudson.qa.jboss.com/hudson/job/droolsjbpm-integration/* Failing tests: http://hudson.qa.jboss.com/hudson/job/droolsjbpm-integration/lastComplete... - SpringDroolsTest.testConfiguration *http://hudson.qa.jboss.com/hudson/job/guvnor/* Failing tests: http://hudson.qa.jboss.com/hudson/job/guvnor/lastCompletedBuild/testReport/ - ServiceImplementationIntegrationTest.testListUserPermissionsPagedResults (jliu, could you please take a look?) - PackageAssemblerIntegrationTest.testFunctionWithFactType (Rikkola, is this as a result of the change I think you were making around Functions you were doing for Mario?) - AssetPackageResourceIntegrationTest.testUpdateAssetFromAtom (RESTEasy issue, do we want to @Ignore on the 5.5.x branch?) - AssetPackageResourceIntegrationTest.testCreateAssetFromAtom (RESTEasy issue, do we want to @Ignore on the 5.5.x branch?) - BasicPackageResourceIntegrationTest.testCreateAndUpdateAndDeletePackageFromAtom (RESTEasy issue, do we want to @Ignore on the 5.5.x branch?) - CategoryResourceIntegrationTest.testGetAssetsCreatedByAtomByCategoryAsAtom (RESTEasy issue, do we want to @Ignore on the 5.5.x branch?) http://hudson.qa.jboss.com/hudson/job/droolsjbpm-build-distribution/ Failing tests: http://hudson.qa.jboss.com/hudson/job/droolsjbpm-build-distribution/lastC... - BPMN2OsgiTest.testMinimalProcess - SimpleOsgiTest.testOsgiPlatformStarts - SimpleOsgiTest.testOsgiEnvironment - SimpleOsgiTest.testCompiler - SimpleOsgiTest.testDecisionTable Who is going to volunteer to look into the Spring and OSGi failing tests? ;) For those who may not already be aware, due to a RESTEasy issue ( https://issues.jboss.org/browse/RESTEASY-782) the Atom REST API in Guvnor only works with AS7.0.1. Any pressure that can be applied to get the RESTEasy team to fix this would be welcome as it is required for jBPM Designer to work with Guvnor on AS7.1.x. With kind regards, Mike On 13 October 2012 17:12, Mark Proctor <mproctor(a)codehaus.org&gt; wrote: > We should try and wrap up CR1 this week. This release will never be > productised, so quicker we can switch to 6.0 the better. We have a month to > produce a stable "runtime" core, 6.0-alpha1, where we promise binary > compatibility to other groups in SOA. > > I'll send an email explaining 6.0-alpha1 for monday. > > Mark