Of course :)
Not removing laune and nheron either.
Op 14-02-13 14:51, Wolfgang Laun schreef:
If the proposed "remove" wouldn't let me do quick fixes
like today's -
as you proposed - then you might want to let me keep this right, at
your discretion ;-)
On 14/02/2013, Geoffrey De Smet <ge0ffrey.spam(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi guys,
> Stemming from the SVN era, a lot of community contributers still have
> full commit rights on the blessed repositories.
> Because GitHub offers the "pull request" paradigm,
> the lack of commit rights are far less intrusive than in SVN.
> Many community contributors seem to prefer contributing changes through
> pull request paradigm,
> as it forces a core developer to sign off on the changes.
> Having direct commit rights can even be counter-intuitive:
> for example, if you edit a file directly on github, it doesn't create a
> pull request, but applies the changes directly.
> Commits from contributors that come in via pull requests are still
> attributed to the original author
> and count towards the original author's stats, so there are no
> additional disadvantages.
> Following that logic, I propose to *remove the commit rights on blessed
> for these contributors* in 72 hours:
> Please note that we appreciate past and future commits. Please keep the
> contributions coming! :)
> If you're on this list and want to keep your commits rights on blessed,
> just reply to this mail and I 'll take you off the list. No long
> argumentation needed :)
> *Keep commits rights on the blessed repositories*
> *Might keep commits right on the blessed repositories*
> I 'll ask these people what they prefer and do that.
rules-dev mailing list