Ignore my last mail, I interpreted this statement wrong:
Anyway, I'll take care of the tests in drools-decisiontables and
drools-template
You mean the @Ignore's probably, not turning them into JUnit4
tests :)
Op 29-12-10 17:07, Geoffrey De Smet schreef:
I also refactored all tests of drools-decisiontables and
drools-template.
However, that doesn't include your new tests not pushed to master yet,
naturally.
If it's not a new test, you might have had a merge conflict with my
changes on the test.
Are you sure "git pull --rebase" did not speak of a merge conflict?
(note git doesn't use the term "merge conflict" always, but more
specific terms sometimes)
Op 29-12-10 15:54, Wolfgang Laun schreef:
> Geoffrey & Co.,
>
> I called in one of the local Green Berets, and he finally resolved
> this matter. What I had was
>
> class FooTest extends junit.framework.TestCase {
> //...
> }
>
> and this is sufficient to force the JUnit 3 test runner, which
> ignores all annotations. Using this
>
> class FooTest{
> //...
> }
>
> *and annotating all testX methods with @Test *will use a JUnit4 test
> runner, which honours @Ignore.
>
> Perhaps I misinterpreted Geoffrey's remark to do a pull --rebase - I
> thought this would update the XyzTest files he had changed, not some
> general update? (Also, being in the midst of some rework/refactoring,
> I didn't want to risk losing any of my work.)
>
> Anyway, I'll take care of the tests in drools-decisiontables and
> drools-template.
>
> Cheers
> Wolfgang
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> rules-dev mailing list
> rules-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev
--
With kind regards,
Geoffrey De Smet
_______________________________________________
rules-dev mailing list
rules-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev
--
With kind regards,
Geoffrey De Smet