Very well written. Thank you.
Whether there's the need for a Drools-prvided library (beyond the things
there are now as accumulate functions) remains to be seen.
I still maintain the notion that it should be possible to obtain quantifier
results and continue LHS evaluation, and I think that the functional
approach would make this easier. It can be done now, using a dedicated
accumulate function, but there's the issue of escaping from the iteration
when the final result is established.
On 19 October 2011 22:59, Mario Fusco <mario.fusco(a)gmail.com> wrote:
as anticipated by Mark, I put down some ideas on how we could start
introducing some functional programming features in the DRL.
It's needless to say that the document has to been considered just a draft
in its very first stage and any feedback or suggestion to improve or clarify
it is welcome.
rules-dev mailing list