After my change ide-commons will depend on verifier.
Toni
On Feb 7, 2011, at 2:47 PM, Geoffrey De Smet wrote:
factconstraints (at least the GUI/GWT part) should be moved into
ide-common I believe.
If verifier no longer depends on ide-common, that should be possible to
move.
verfier does have any GUI/GWT code (or build therefor).
Op 07-02-11 13:38, Esteban Aliverti schreef:
>
> And what about factconstraint? It should be possible to move it to
> drools-verifier?
>
> Best regards,
>
>> El feb 7, 2011 5:53 a.m., "Toni Rikkola" <toni.rikkola(a)gmail.com
>> <mailto:toni.rikkola@gmail.com>> escribió:
>>
>> It should be possible to keep drools-verifier in the drools repo.
>> Doing some changes to support this right now.
>>
>> Toni
>>
>>
>> On Feb 6, 2011, at 11:17 AM, Geoffrey De Smet wrote:
>>
>>> After the split-up drools-verifier is suppo...
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> rules-dev mailing list
> rules-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev
--
With kind regards,
Geoffrey De Smet
_______________________________________________
rules-dev mailing list
rules-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev