Re: [rules-dev] Possible memory leak in Drools 6.0.1

On 28 Mar 2014, at 23:52, "Mark Proctor [via Drools]" <ml-node+s46999n4029018h23(a)n3.nabble.com&gt; wrote: Can you get us a unit test demonstrating this, and we’ll look into it as a priority. Mark On 28 Mar 2014, at 15:40, kellyajp <[hidden email]> wrote: > We have upgraded from Drools 5 -> Drools 6.01 and when repeating the > processing in each environment we have very different object counts that is > causing memory to run out on Drools 6: > > Below is an extract from a heap dump > > In Drools 6 the main objects in the heap are > 1: 4378006 700480960 org.drools.core.reteoo.RightTuple > > Where as in Drools 5 there are way less objects > 92: 19022 1826112 org.drools.reteoo.RightTuple > > Has anyone else had any experience of this issue? > > Thanks > > > > -- > View this message in context: http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/Possible-memory-leak-in-Drools-6-0-1-tp... > Sent from the Drools: Developer (committer) mailing list mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > _______________________________________________ > rules-dev mailing list > [hidden email] > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev _______________________________________________ rules-dev mailing list [hidden email] https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev If you reply to this email, your message will be added to the discussion below: http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/Possible-memory-leak-in-Drools-6-0-1-tp... To unsubscribe from Possible memory leak in Drools 6.0.1, click here. NAML