are there any private github repos? I would expect not. In which case you
can clone any repo you want. But the preferred workflow, I guess, would be
for people to fork, push their changes to their repo in their account, and
send a pull request. Then one of the core team will review, and take that
in. It is a better way of accepting patches. Makes it easier for the fork-er
to keep track of the tip of the source tree, and more chance of their pull
request being more relevant.
On Wed, Dec 22, 2010 at 2:46 AM, Andrew Waterman <awaterma(a)ecosur.mx> wrote:
Hi Michael,
I was just wondering what the project name would be in GitHub. By private,
I just meant that on GitHub there will be private committers (you and
others, as part of the Drools team) and a public repository that can be
forked for individuals (non-committers such as myself) to make downstream
changes on their own GitHub accounts. Non drools committers can then
propose changes as a pull request or the traditional patch. It will make it
really easy (and fun) for people like myself to try out some ideas and
changes for our specific applications. :)
Anyway, really stupid question on my part, as I assume you guys will
broadcast the repo name on the mailing lists as well as the website when
you're ready. I'm just excited, that's all. :)
best wishes,
Andrew
On Dec 18, 2010, at 2:45 AM, Michael Neale wrote:
All of it would be public all the time. There is no other way unless you
pay for a private repo.
So people can pull from any repo, or branch.
Now github will offer you a http url you can do to git clone - DO NOT USE
IT. I have never had it succeed for me. You need to use the ssh/native one.
if you can't use ssh - we will have to find a way to, perhaps, mail round a
zipped up repo (you can do this) and you download that, and then setup git,
and pull any subsequent changes.
Things may have changed, but the http version of git has never been that
great for me at least (others may correct me)
On Sat, Dec 18, 2010 at 8:37 AM, Andrew Waterman <awaterma(a)ecosur.mx>wrote:
> Hi Geoffrey,
>
> I imagine the GitHub repository will have a public face that
> non-committers can pull from or Fork. Will you guys be broadcasting this
> location once the move is complete? I had tried git-svn with the Drools SVN
> public location, but could never get the command to finish. It will be nice
> to be able to pull and work with your public source from GitHub. Thanks!
>
> best wishes,
>
> Andrew
>
>
> On Dec 16, 2010, at 4:52 AM, Geoffrey De Smet wrote:
>
> Hi guys,
>
> This is just a friendly reminder that
> I need your github login by the end of the day
> if you have SVN commit rights and want to have those on github too.
> Do include your svn login, full name and github used e-mail address.
>
> Op 11-12-10 16:49, Geoffrey De Smet schreef:
>
> Hi guys,
>
> We been talking a while on this on IRC,
> so now, like many other JBoss projects (hibernate, infinispan, ...),
> *we are moving to git on github*.
>
> - What do you need to do? => MUST READ, *deadline Thursday 16-DEC-2010*
> - Why are we moving to git?
> - What will you get by moving to git?
>
> What do you need to do?
> ===============
>
> If you are a drools committer and wish to continue committing after next
> Saturday 18-DEC-2010.
> 1) Install git for your OS
> 1a) Linux: Install the package git (and optionally gitk)
> $ sudo apt-get install git
> $ sudo apt-get install gitk
> 1b) Windows: Use the icon on the right on
http://git-scm.com
> 1c) Mac OSX: Use the icon on the right on
http://git-scm.com (and
> optionally install gitx from
http://gitx.frim.nl/ )
> 2) Install git in your IDE
> 2b) Eclipse: Install the EGit plugin. Menu Help, menu item Install new
> software. Work with update site Helios, open Tree item Collaboration, tree
> item Eclipse EGit.
> 2c) IntelliJ: Enable the git plugin (if not enabled): menu file, menu
> item Other Settings, menu item Configure plugins.
> 3) Get a Github account:
https://github.com/signup/free
> 4) Configure git correctly (Github also tells you this):
> $ git --version
> git version 1.7.1
> $ git config --global user.name myUsername
> $ git config --global user.email myAccount(a)gmail.com
> $ git config --global -l
> user.name=ge0ffrey
> user.email=ge0ffrey.spam@...
> 5) *Mail me these details before next Thursday 16-DEC-2010*
> (to gds.geoffrey.de.smet at gmail dot com or ge0ffrey.spam at gmail dot
> com )
> if you are a drools committer (which I 'll verify):
> 5a) Your Github username
> 5b) Your JBoss Subversion username
> 5c) Your full name
> 5d) Your e-mail address (used on github). Note: you can register more
> than 1 e-mail address on GitHub.
> 6) Push your public key to github:
> Follow the instructions on
>
http://github.com/guides/providing-your-ssh-key
>
> *Do NOT commit changes to subversion after Friday evening (so after 8:00
> GMT Saturday 18-DEC-2010).*
> The svn to git migration will probably take hours. Sorry in advance for
> the hindrance.
> I 'll send a mail to the drools dev list when svn commits are forbidden
> and also when git commits are open.
> More info about the git URL and switching tips & tricks will follow soon.
>
> Why are we moving to git?
> =================
>
> Subversion has been great (and much better than CVS), but git's just
> better.
>
> How my life improved since last month when I used svn. by Emmanuel Bernard
> (Hibernate annotations etc lead)
>
>
http://blog.emmanuelbernard.com/2010/05/git-how-my-life-has-improved-sinc...
>
> Why is git better than subversion?
>
http://whygitisbetterthanx.com/#svn
>
> What will you get by moving to git?
> ======================
>
> - Less merge conflicts and therefor easier branching
>
> - Pull requests
>
> Pull requests are *really cool*. It's like *patches on steroids*.
> Ever been in a situation where you made a big, risky change?
> You wanted to commit it (to get it off your plate, it's done),
> but you'd like to get it peer reviewed by colleague X (because it's
> risky).
> But a patch file didn't work because:
> - A patch file can't handle binary files
> - A patch file probably results in a merge conflict on applying (so X
> ignores them)
> - Applying a patch file needs to be done on the correct directory
> - A patch file will forget I am the author and will make X the author
> - A patch file does not allow for a conversation when X wants me to change
> something before committing it
> With git, just commit it as a pull request. Take a look at the pull
> requests (with comments!) on hibernate-core:
>
https://github.com/hibernate/hibernate-core/pulls
>
> - Multitasking in isolation
> You work on a big improvement but you stumble up an existing bug (in the
> same file(s)).
> You want to fix the bug, the unfinished changes of the big improvement
> break the build.
> And - even worse - the big improvement changes break because of the
> existing bug.
> Read "Multitasking in isolation" on
>
>
http://blog.emmanuelbernard.com/2010/05/git-how-my-life-has-improved-sinc...
>
> --
> With kind regards,
> Geoffrey De Smet
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> rules-dev mailing
listrules-dev@lists.jboss.orghttps://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev
>
>
> --
> With kind regards,
> Geoffrey De Smet
>
> _______________________________________________
> rules-dev mailing list
> rules-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> rules-dev mailing list
> rules-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev
>
>
--
Michael D Neale
home:
www.michaelneale.net
blog:
michaelneale.blogspot.com
_______________________________________________
rules-dev mailing list
rules-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev
_______________________________________________
rules-dev mailing list
rules-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev