Hi, These are the current issues.... *http://jenkins.mw.lab.eng.bos.redhat.com/hudson/job/drools-5.5.x/* Failing tests: http://jenkins.mw.lab.eng.bos.redhat.com/hudson/job/drools-5.5.x/lastComp... * org.drools.integrationtests.MultithreadTest.testSlidingTimeWindows *http://jenkins.mw.lab.eng.bos.redhat.com/hudson/job/jbpm-5.4.x/* Failing tests: http://jenkins.mw.lab.eng.bos.redhat.com/hudson/job/jbpm-5.4.x/lastComple... * org.jbpm.bpmn2.SimpleBPMNProcessTest.testMultipleStartEventsStartOnTimer *http://jenkins.mw.lab.eng.bos.redhat.com/hudson/job/guvnor-5.5.x/* Failing tests: http://jenkins.mw.lab.eng.bos.redhat.com/hudson/job/guvnor-5.5.x/lastComp... * AssetPackageResourceIntegrationTest.testUpdateAssetFromAtom (RESTEasy issue) * AssetPackageResourceIntegrationTest.testCreateAssetFromAtom (RESTEasy issue) * BasicPackageResourceIntegrationTest.testCreateAndUpdateAndDeletePackageFromAtom (RESTEasy issue) * CategoryResourceIntegrationTest.testGetAssetsCreatedByAtomByCategoryAsAtom (RESTEasy issue)

Thanks to those concerned for fixing the failing tests from my previous email. With kind regards, Mike On 16 October 2012 08:51, Toni Rikkola <toni(a)rikkola.net <mailto:toni@rikkola.net>> wrote: This test keeps passing for me locally. I'm using the 5.5.x branch. PackageAssemblerIntegrationTest.testFunctionWithFactType (Rikkola, is this as a result of the change I think you were making around Functions you were doing for Mario?) Toni On Oct 15, 2012, at 12:18 PM, Michael Anstis wrote: > Hi, > > I will make the 5.5.x branch today. > > These are the current issues.... > * > http://hudson.qa.jboss.com/hudson/job/droolsjbpm-integration/* > > Failing tests: > http://hudson.qa.jboss.com/hudson/job/droolsjbpm-integration/lastComplete... > > * SpringDroolsTest.testConfiguration > > > *http://hudson.qa.jboss.com/hudson/job/guvnor/* > > Failing tests: > http://hudson.qa.jboss.com/hudson/job/guvnor/lastCompletedBuild/testReport/ > > * ServiceImplementationIntegrationTest.testListUserPermissionsPagedResults > (jliu, could you please take a look?) > * PackageAssemblerIntegrationTest.testFunctionWithFactType > (Rikkola, is this as a result of the change I think you > were making around Functions you were doing for Mario?) > * AssetPackageResourceIntegrationTest.testUpdateAssetFromAtom > (RESTEasy issue, do we want to @Ignore on the 5.5.x branch?) > * AssetPackageResourceIntegrationTest.testCreateAssetFromAtom > (RESTEasy issue, do we want to @Ignore on the 5.5.x branch?) > * BasicPackageResourceIntegrationTest.testCreateAndUpdateAndDeletePackageFromAtom > (RESTEasy issue, do we want to @Ignore on the 5.5.x branch?) > * CategoryResourceIntegrationTest.testGetAssetsCreatedByAtomByCategoryAsAtom > (RESTEasy issue, do we want to @Ignore on the 5.5.x branch?) > > > http://hudson.qa.jboss.com/hudson/job/droolsjbpm-build-distribution/ > > Failing tests: > http://hudson.qa.jboss.com/hudson/job/droolsjbpm-build-distribution/lastC... > > * BPMN2OsgiTest.testMinimalProcess > * SimpleOsgiTest.testOsgiPlatformStarts > * SimpleOsgiTest.testOsgiEnvironment > * SimpleOsgiTest.testCompiler > * SimpleOsgiTest.testDecisionTable > > Who is going to volunteer to look into the Spring and OSGi > failing tests? ;) > > For those who may not already be aware, due to a RESTEasy issue > (https://issues.jboss.org/browse/RESTEASY-782) the Atom REST API > in Guvnor only works with AS7.0.1. > > Any pressure that can be applied to get the RESTEasy team to fix > this would be welcome as it is required for jBPM Designer to work > with Guvnor on AS7.1.x. > > With kind regards, > > Mike > > On 13 October 2012 17:12, Mark Proctor <mproctor(a)codehaus.org > <mailto:mproctor@codehaus.org>> wrote: > > We should try and wrap up CR1 this week. This release will > never be productised, so quicker we can switch to 6.0 the > better. We have a month to produce a stable "runtime" core, > 6.0-alpha1, where we promise binary compatibility to other > groups in SOA. > > I'll send an email explaining 6.0-alpha1 for monday. > > Mark > >