Felipe, Thanks. I'm working on it. BTW, I forgot to mention, what you are doing to control rules is a not a good way to do it. You should try agenda-group+lock-on- active rule attributes instead. Look at the conway's game of life as an example, and maybe help us document the feature... :) []s Edson 2007/7/3, Felipe Piccolini < felipe.piccolini(a)bluesoft.cl&gt;: Edson, Thanks for the reply... it is nasty... Jira created... http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBRULES-966 Thanks PD: duplicated email because I forgot to cut the huge-company- signature... :) On 03-07-2007, at 14:18, Edson Tirelli wrote: > > Felipe, > > Ok, this is a nasty damn bug. :( > > I'm working on a solution for it right now. May I ask you > please to open a JIRA for it and attach your code bellow? > > Thank you, > Edson > > 2007/7/3, Felipe Piccolini < felipe.piccolini(a)bluesoft.cl&gt;: > I know I already asked this in a previous email, but no answer and > diferent subject... so I'll ask again > > I have an issue using update in 2 rules that update the same > object... a loop is created even when I try to > avoid the loop adding an extra condition to each rule... Im > inserting an ArrayList as a fact too, so I can check > the extra condition... > > Can anyone tell me how to fix this? > > Consider this: > //-------RULES----------------------------- > package cl.bluesoft.test > > #list any import classes here. > import java.util.List > import java.util.ArrayList > > import cl.bluesoft.test.rules.Fact > > #declare any global variables here > > rule "test update A" > salience 699 > no-loop > when > $f : Fact($n: number > 0) > $list: ArrayList( this excludes "key1" ) > then > System.out.println( "A-fact number1:"+$f.getNumber()+ " list > 1:"+$list); > $list.add( "key1" ); > $f.setNumber($n + 1); > update ($f); > update ($list); > System.out.println("A-fact number2:" +$f.getNumber()+" list > 2:" +$list); > end > > > rule "test update B" > salience 699 > no-loop > when > $f : Fact($n: number > 1) > $list: ArrayList( this excludes "key2" ) > then > System.out.println( "B-fact number1:" +$f.getNumber()+" list > 1:" +$list); > $list.add("key2" ); > $f.setNumber($n + 1); > update ($f); > update ($list); > System.out.println("B-fact number2:" +$f.getNumber()+ " list > 2:"+$list); > end > > //-------FACT----------------------------- > public class Fact implements Serializable { > private static final long serialVersionUID = 331627137981862975L; > > private int number; > > public Fact(int number){ > this.number = number; > } > > public Fact(){ > this(0); > } > > /** > * @return the number > */ > public int getNumber() { > return number; > } > > /** > * @param number the number to set > */ > public void setNumber(int number) { > this.number = number; > } > > } > > //------TEST--------- > public class TestUpdateFact implements Serializable { > > private static final long serialVersionUID = -574789596641083743L; > > /** > * @param args > */ > public static void main(String[] args) { > RuleBase ruleBase = RuleBaseFactory.newRuleBase(); > Package pkg = builder.getPackage(); > .... > WorkingMemory session = ruleBase.getStatefulSession(); > ...etc etc... > > List list = new ArrayList(); > > Fact fact1 = new Fact(1); > > session.fireAllRules(); > > ....etc, etc... > > } > > } > > //--------OUTPUT------------ > A-fact number1:1 list 1:[] > A-fact number2:2 list 2:[key1] > B-fact number1:2 list 1:[key1] > B-fact number2:3 list 2:[key1, key2] > A-fact number1:3 list 1:[key1, key2] > A-fact number2:4 list 2:[key1, key2, key1] > B-fact number1:4 list 1:[key1, key2, key1] > B-fact number2:5 list 2:[key1, key2, key1, key2] > A-fact number1:5 list 1:[key1, key2, key1, key2] > A-fact number2:6 list 2:[key1, key2, key1, key2, key1] > B-fact number1:6 list 1:[key1, key2, key1, key2, key1] > B-fact number2:7 list 2:[key1, key2, key1, key2, key1, key2] > A-fact number1:7 list 1:[key1, key2, key1, key2, key1, key2] > A-fact number2:8 list 2:[key1, key2, key1, key2, key1, key2, key1] > B-fact number1:8 list 1:[key1, key2, key1, key2, key1, key2, key1] > > .... for ever..... > > So I have a loop... only when I use update and both rules... > condition about the > list not containing "key1" and "key2" seems not properly > chequed... I dont know... > > Can somebody help me? Am I missing something here? > > Thanks. > > > Felipe Piccolini M. > felipe.piccolini(a)bluesoft.cl > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > rules-users mailing list > rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users > > > > > -- > Edson Tirelli > Software Engineer - JBoss Rules Core Developer > Office: +55 11 3529-6000 > Mobile: +55 11 9287-5646 > JBoss, a division of Red Hat @ www.jboss.com > _______________________________________________ > rules-users mailing list > rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users Felipe Piccolini M. felipe.piccolini(a)bluesoft.cl _______________________________________________ rules-dev mailing list rules-dev(a)lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev -- Edson Tirelli Software Engineer - JBoss Rules Core Developer Office: +55 11 3529-6000 Mobile: +55 11 9287-5646 JBoss, a division of Red Hat @ www.jboss.com _______________________________________________ rules-dev mailing list rules-dev(a)lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev

Edson, I tried what you said, but it is not the same... cant get the expected result. With agenda-group the can control de flow, but outside the rules (auto-focus didnt work well), and before that I prefer to use rule-flow-group (and use the GUI). What Im trying to get is a set of rules that dont depend on flows or sequences to work together, because this set of rules can be large and I dont want the business user have to check all rules to know how to write the next rule... they must be writen in an independent way, but work together... lock-on-active didnt work either to get that result, because when I use it stops activations, so the update(fact) actually has no effect on other rules... I need to put wm.setFocus("group1");wm.setFocus("group2");..etc. at the java code... I dont want to do that... Maybe you can help me... an example will be this...(pseudo code) rule "base vacation days" when e: Employee( yearsInCompany > 1) then e.setVacationDays(10); update(e); end rule "seniors extra vacation days" when e: Employee( yearsInCompany > 4, vd: vacationDays) then e.setVacationDays(vd+2); update(e); end rule "old-employee extra vacation days" when e: Employee( yearsInCompany > 10, vd: vacationDays) then e.setVacationDays(vd+4); update(e); end ....and so on.... So I need the business ppl write this rules without knowing the rest of the rules... I think this is the idea of having a rule-system... Thanks. On 03-07-2007, at 16:40, Edson Tirelli wrote: Felipe, Thanks. I'm working on it. BTW, I forgot to mention, what you are doing to control rules is a not a good way to do it. You should try agenda-group+lock-on-active rule attributes instead. Look at the conway's game of life as an example, and maybe help us document the feature... :) []s Edson 2007/7/3, Felipe Piccolini < felipe.piccolini(a)bluesoft.cl&gt;: > > Edson, > > Thanks for the reply... it is nasty... > > Jira created... > http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBRULES-966 > > Thanks > > PD: duplicated email because I forgot to cut the > huge-company-signature... :) > > On 03-07-2007, at 14:18, Edson Tirelli wrote: > > > Felipe, > > Ok, this is a nasty damn bug. :( > > I'm working on a solution for it right now. May I ask you please to > open a JIRA for it and attach your code bellow? > > Thank you, > Edson > > 2007/7/3, Felipe Piccolini < felipe.piccolini(a)bluesoft.cl&gt;: > > > > I know I already asked this in a previous email, but no answer and > > diferent subject... so I'll ask again > > > > I have an issue using update in 2 rules that update the same object... > > a loop is created even when I try to > > avoid the loop adding an extra condition to each rule... Im inserting > > an ArrayList as a fact too, so I can check > > the extra condition... > > > > Can anyone tell me how to fix this? > > > > Consider this: > > //-------RULES----------------------------- > > package cl.bluesoft.test > > > > #list any import classes here. > > import java.util.List > > import java.util.ArrayList > > > > import cl.bluesoft.test.rules.Fact > > > > #declare any global variables here > > > > rule "test update A" > > salience 699 > > no-loop > > when > > $f : Fact($n: number > 0) > > $list: ArrayList( this excludes "key1" ) > > then > > System.out.println( "A-fact number1:"+$f.getNumber()+ " list 1:" > > +$list); > > $list.add( "key1" ); > > $f.setNumber($n + 1); > > update ($f); > > update ($list); > > System.out.println("A-fact number2:" +$f.getNumber()+" list 2:" > > +$list); > > end > > > > > > rule "test update B" > > salience 699 > > no-loop > > when > > $f : Fact($n: number > 1) > > $list: ArrayList( this excludes "key2" ) > > then > > System.out.println( "B-fact number1:" +$f.getNumber()+" list 1:" > > +$list); > > $list.add("key2" ); > > $f.setNumber($n + 1); > > update ($f); > > update ($list); > > System.out.println("B-fact number2:" +$f.getNumber()+ " list 2:" > > +$list); > > end > > > > //-------FACT----------------------------- > > public class Fact implements Serializable { > > private static final long serialVersionUID = 331627137981862975L; > > > > private int number; > > > > public Fact(int number){ > > this.number = number; > > } > > > > public Fact(){ > > this(0); > > } > > > > /** > > * @return the number > > */ > > public int getNumber() { > > return number; > > } > > > > /** > > * @param number the number to set > > */ > > public void setNumber(int number) { > > this.number = number; > > } > > > > } > > > > //------TEST--------- > > public class TestUpdateFact implements Serializable { > > > > private static final long serialVersionUID = -574789596641083743L; > > > > /** > > * @param args > > */ > > public static void main(String[] args) { > > RuleBase ruleBase = RuleBaseFactory.newRuleBase(); > > Package pkg = builder.getPackage(); > > .... > > WorkingMemory session = ruleBase.getStatefulSession(); > > ...etc etc... > > > > List list = new ArrayList(); > > > > Fact fact1 = new Fact(1); > > > > session.fireAllRules(); > > > > ....etc, etc... > > > > } > > > > } > > > > //--------OUTPUT------------ > > A-fact number1:1 list 1:[] > > A-fact number2:2 list 2:[key1] > > B-fact number1:2 list 1:[key1] > > B-fact number2:3 list 2:[key1, key2] > > A-fact number1:3 list 1:[key1, key2] > > A-fact number2:4 list 2:[key1, key2, key1] > > B-fact number1:4 list 1:[key1, key2, key1] > > B-fact number2:5 list 2:[key1, key2, key1, key2] > > A-fact number1:5 list 1:[key1, key2, key1, key2] > > A-fact number2:6 list 2:[key1, key2, key1, key2, key1] > > B-fact number1:6 list 1:[key1, key2, key1, key2, key1] > > B-fact number2:7 list 2:[key1, key2, key1, key2, key1, key2] > > A-fact number1:7 list 1:[key1, key2, key1, key2, key1, key2] > > A-fact number2:8 list 2:[key1, key2, key1, key2, key1, key2, key1] > > B-fact number1:8 list 1:[key1, key2, key1, key2, key1, key2, key1] > > > > .... for ever..... > > > > So I have a loop... only when I use update and both rules... > > condition about the > > list not containing "key1" and "key2" seems not properly chequed... I > > dont know... > > > > Can somebody help me? Am I missing something here? > > > > Thanks. > > > > > > * Felipe Piccolini M.* > > felipe.piccolini(a)bluesoft.cl > > > > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > rules-users mailing list > > rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org > > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users > > > > > > > -- > Edson Tirelli > Software Engineer - JBoss Rules Core Developer > Office: +55 11 3529-6000 > Mobile: +55 11 9287-5646 > JBoss, a division of Red Hat @ www.jboss.com > _______________________________________________ > rules-users mailing list > rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users > > > > * Felipe Piccolini M.* > felipe.piccolini(a)bluesoft.cl > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > rules-dev mailing list > rules-dev(a)lists.jboss.org > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev > > -- Edson Tirelli Software Engineer - JBoss Rules Core Developer Office: +55 11 3529-6000 Mobile: +55 11 9287-5646 JBoss, a division of Red Hat @ www.jboss.com _______________________________________________ rules-dev mailing list rules-dev(a)lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev Atentamente, ______________________ *Felipe Piccolini Marfull* Jefe de Proyectos Agustina 1141 Piso 8-B Santiago Fono +(56 2) 68830837 E-mail felipe.piccolini(a)bluesoft.cl <richard.calderon(a)bluesoft.cl&gt; _______________________________________________ rules-dev mailing list rules-dev(a)lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev