BTW if you can write me a test for weld core tests (just copy the one in
org.jboss.weld.tests.extensions) then I can probably fix much quicker :-)
On 25 Nov 2009, at 13:47, Pete Muir wrote:
I'm still ploughing through email backlog, exhaustion, housework,
paperwork, and other tasks ;-) but I am hopeful that Thanksgiving will give me time to
catch up and I can start fixing bugs in Weld this week.
On 23 Nov 2009, at 22:29, Stuart Douglas wrote:
> I have managed to work around this by storing a Set of every java class I have
registered and the vetoing the bean when it comes up bean discovery. Any idea when this
will be fixed? I could work around it properly by generating a new class using javassist
for every bean I add with the SPI, however I would rather not go down that route.
>
> Stuart
> ________________________________________
> From: Pete Muir [pmuir(a)redhat.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, 24 November 2009 4:04 AM
> To: Gavin King
> Cc: Stuart Douglas; seam-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
> Subject: Re: [seam-dev] Overriding annotated types and the SPI
>
> Yes, this is a bug for sure :-)
>
>
https://jira.jboss.org/jira/browse/WELD-309
>
> On 23 Nov 2009, at 16:52, Gavin King wrote:
>
>> Pete, there are allowed to be two AnnotatedTypes for the same Java class.
>>
>> On Mon, Nov 23, 2009 at 8:17 AM, Pete Muir <pmuir(a)redhat.com> wrote:
>>> I guess what you are seeing is bug in Weld, whereby we need to adjust quite
what makes two annotated types equal so that you see both the one you added, and the new
one, rather than only getting one or the other. Even with this fix, you would have an
error, as you now have two identical classes which Weld will discover beans for. You need
to veto the built in annotated type (otherwise you end up *adding* an existing annotated
type, not replacing it).
>>>
>>> On 23 Nov 2009, at 07:37, Stuart Douglas wrote:
>>>
>>>> I am trying to register an additional bean. It works perfectly when the
class is not in a bean deployment archive, however if QualifiedBean2 is in a bean
deployment archive then it stops working. The bean itself does not have any annotations.
>>>>
>>>> Stuart
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> ________________________________________
>>>> From: Gavin King [gavin.king(a)gmail.com]
>>>> Sent: Monday, 23 November 2009 6:29 PM
>>>> To: Stuart Douglas
>>>> Cc: seam-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>>>> Subject: Re: [seam-dev] Overriding annotated types and the SPI
>>>>
>>>> Are you trying to:
>>>>
>>>> (a) *override* the bean that the container creates, or
>>>> (b) are you trying to register additional beans?
>>>>
>>>> If (a), you would need to call veto() on the AnnotatedType created by
>>>> the container.
>>>>
>>>> On Mon, Nov 23, 2009 at 1:19 AM, Stuart Douglas
>>>> <stuart(a)baileyroberts.com.au> wrote:
>>>>> I have been working on my XML configuration extension and have been
making good progress, however I have run into some behavior that I cannot explain.
>>>>> At the moment in my XML file I can do this:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> <test:OtherQualifier>
>>>>> <Qualifier/>
>>>>> </test:OtherQualifier>
>>>>>
>>>>> <test:QualifiedBean2>
>>>>> <test:OtherQualifier value1="BB"
value2="2"/>
>>>>> </test:QualifiedBean2>
>>>>>
>>>>> <test:QualifierTestBean>
>>>>> <test:bean2>
>>>>> <test:OtherQualifier value1="BB"
value2="2"/>
>>>>> <Inject/>
>>>>> </test:bean2>
>>>>> </test:QualifierTestBean>
>>>>>
>>>>> When my extension sees this it creates two AnnotatedTypes and a
Qualifier and registers them in the BeforeBeanDiscovery event. This all works fine,
QualifiedBean2 gets injected into QualifierTestBean and life is good.
>>>>> However if QualifiedBean2 is deployed inside a Bean archive things
suddenly go pear shaped, all of a sudden the container seems to forget about the qualifier
on QualifiedBean2 and it stops working. Does anyone have any idea what could be causing
this? It looks like the bean deployment process is overriding my user supplied type level
metadata.
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>
>>>>> Stuart
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> seam-dev mailing list
>>>>> seam-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>>>>>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/seam-dev
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Gavin King
>>>> gavin.king(a)gmail.com
>>>>
http://in.relation.to/Bloggers/Gavin
>>>>
http://hibernate.org
>>>>
http://seamframework.org
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> seam-dev mailing list
>>>> seam-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>>>>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/seam-dev
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Gavin King
>> gavin.king(a)gmail.com
>>
http://in.relation.to/Bloggers/Gavin
>>
http://hibernate.org
>>
http://seamframework.org
>