On Thu, Mar 31, 2011 at 11:58, Dan Allen <dan.j.allen(a)gmail.com> wrote:
On Thu, Mar 31, 2011 at 11:40, Sebastian E. Ovide <
sebastian.ovide(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I've just updated my pom replacing 3.0.0.Alpha3 with 3.0.0.Final and I've
> got a couple of errors.
>
> I've fixed the first error just adding
>
> <dependency>
> <groupId>joda-time</groupId>
> <artifactId>joda-time</artifactId>
> <version>1.6.2</version>
> </dependency>
>
>
> is is ok to define seam dependencies manually ? should not that dependency
> been part of seam ?
>
Absolutely you can define dependencies manually. The seam-bom is there to
save you from having to worry about the versions (and for us to communicate
the recommended versions). Joda time is in the seam-bom:
<properties>
...
<joda.time.version>1.6</joda.time.version>
...
</properties>
<dependency>
<groupId>joda-time</groupId>
<artifactId>joda-time</artifactId>
<version>${joda.time.version}</version>
</dependency>
Meaning you can put this in your pom.xml:
<dependency>
<groupId>joda-time</groupId>
<artifactId>joda-time</groupId>
</dependency>
Joda time is an optional dependency of Seam International, which is why you
have to specify it.
-Dan
--
Dan Allen
Principal Software Engineer, Red Hat | Author of Seam in Action
Registered Linux User #231597
http://www.google.com/profiles/dan.j.allen#about
http://mojavelinux.com
http://mojavelinux.com/seaminaction