Re: [seam-dev] Page fragment cache with JBoss Treecache, ehcache and a FileSystemCache
Christian Bauer schrieb:
On May 03, 2008, at 11:48 , Pete Muir wrote:
>> FileSystemCache
>> Manually written, idea: a large site cannot be hold in a cache being
>> present in memory. This cache has a small in memory area holding
>> very frequent files (size can be configured) and fetches files from
>> disk.
>> Though the operation system caches access to disk, this is still a
>> lot slower than memory access but probably faster than having
>> complex queries to the database (see Seam Wiki queries)
>
> I'm not quite sure why we need this?
Given that ehcache supports configurable overflow to disk, I
concur._______________________________________________
I will test the behaviour of EHCache using the Disk Overflow and give
you a feedback on this.
JBoss Cache 1.x and 2
This won't be compilable at the same time. How shall I provide this,
because I would break the build.
I will provide the abstraction for the Pojo as well, though I do not
perfectly see the need. It is slower than the normal JBoss Cache (alias
TreeCache).
Best Regards
Sebastian