On 20 Apr 2009, at 22:42, Dan Allen wrote:
I really see this as a module. It's no different than our current
spring (and now guice) integration in that sense. We could have an
"ioc" common module and then have modules that build on that. But in
general it is IoC (or really DI) related.
IOC was a bad name for that module originally, lets not repeat that
mistake.
What about DI, or is that too general? I guess the first question to
answer is what is the nature of these integrations. The JBoss AS
team has probably thought about this terminology so we should see
what they have to say about the name. Obviously, each integration
would be named after the framework, but if there were shared code
what would it be called? Not a question we have to answer right away.
Huh? What has DI/IOC got to do with it? These modules don't provide
DI, they provide integrations with other frameworks. Anyway, this
stuff belongs in Web Beans, not Seam.
--
Pete Muir
http://www.seamframework.org
http://in.relation.to/Bloggers/Pete