Yes, but people still use Seam Security, so until we have another solution
that is actually usable, I'm going to keep trying to help this one along.
On Fri, Jan 4, 2013 at 4:52 PM, Jason Porter <lightguard.jp(a)gmail.com>wrote:
Seam 3 was discontinued first quarter last year. There isn't any
further
work being done on it (unless some community members are working on their
own forks). Security stuff has been moved into PicketLink.
On Fri, Jan 4, 2013 at 7:30 AM, Nicolas Pymma <nicolas.heron(a)pymma.com>wrote:
> Hi,
> My name is Nicolas Heron and I am member of the drools community.
> One module of is a web application called Guvnor that uses seam-security
> for authentication.
> I run into the following issue
https://issues.jboss.org/**
> browse/SEAMSECURITY-98 <
https://issues.jboss.org/browse/SEAMSECURITY-98>
> and applied locally the merge request associated. Now the issue is
> corrected.
> I recreated a pull request
https://github.com/seam/**security/pull/44<https://github.com/seam/sec...
same as the previous one).
> I would like to know if you will accept the merge request as it is not
> possible for now to use seam security on Jaas which is quite a standard in
> the J2EE.
> Thanks in advance
> Nicolas Héron
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> seam-dev mailing list
> seam-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/seam-dev
>
>
--
Jason Porter
http://lightguard-jp.blogspot.com
http://twitter.com/lightguardjp
Software Engineer
Open Source Advocate
PGP key id: 926CCFF5
PGP key available at:
keyserver.net,
pgp.mit.edu
_______________________________________________
seam-dev mailing list
seam-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/seam-dev