Okay, I'll discuss this with Stuart tomorrow, for AS7.
-Jaikiran
On Tuesday 05 July 2011 05:33 PM, Mark Struberg wrote:
yes, it would definitely confuse people imo.
Especially since you can activate Extensions by adding them in
WEB-INF/classes/META-INF/services/..
but
WEB-INF/classes/META-INF/beans.xml
would be ignored?
Feels a bit odd ;)
LieGrue,
strub
--- On Tue, 7/5/11, Pete Muir<pmuir(a)redhat.com> wrote:
> From: Pete Muir<pmuir(a)redhat.com>
> Subject: Re: [seam-dev] Issue resolved with JBoss AS 7 CR1 and Seam Social
> To: "Mark Struberg"<struberg(a)yahoo.de>
> Cc: jpai(a)redhat.com, seam-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
> Date: Tuesday, July 5, 2011, 10:51 AM
>
> On 5 Jul 2011, at 10:01, Mark Struberg wrote:
>
>> Hi Jaikiran!
>>
>> Yup it could be more clear ;)
>>
>> To add another pro argument:
>> java.util.ServiceLoader does pickup stuff from
> WEB-INF/classes/META-INF/services too if this is an
> indicator ;)
>
> Yes, I think it is assumed that WEB-INF/classes/META-INF is
> a META-INF directory in servlet/Java EE, even if the spec
> doesn't call it out as such.
>
> I do think JBoss AS 7 is being a little ott by not allowing
> it, and it's going to confuse people.