On Fri, May 29, 2009 at 1:37 PM, Jay Balunas <tech4j(a)gmail.com> wrote:
On Fri, May 29, 2009 at 7:53 AM, Emmanuel Bernard <emmanuel(a)hibernate.org>wrote:
> On May 29, 2009, at 13:24, Pete Muir wrote:
>> On 29 May 2009, at 09:50, Christian Bauer wrote:
>>> On May 29, 2009, at 10:47 , Emmanuel Bernard wrote:
>>> Can we upgrade to Hibernate 3.3 and if yes on which branch? Denis don't
>>>> seem to have issues with seam 2.1.2 + hibernate 3.3.1 + slf4j + log4j +
>>>> PS: this would unleash Hibernate Search 3.1 (which needs Core 3.3)
>>> We also need slf4j for RESTEasy, by the way. So +1 on moving Seam from
>>> commons-logging to slf4j in 2.2.
>> Guys, Seam DOES NOT DEPEND ON commons-logging :-)
> Stop yelling and answer the original question ;) I couldn't care less
> about loggers.
Apparently no one cares ;-) but richfaces 3.3.X currently depends on
commons-logging 1.1. There is already a discuss point for 4.0 for
dependencies, and we can adjust for RF 3.3.2 if needed.
I think what no one cares about is unnecessary complexity. If we can once
and for all get this over with and put it behind us so that we are all using
the same, simple logging solution, then we can develop more interesting
things ;) Thanks in advance, Jay, for bringing RichFaces inline.
Senior Software Engineer, Red Hat | Author of Seam in Action
NOTE: While I make a strong effort to keep up with my email on a daily
basis, personal or other work matters can sometimes keep me away
from my email. If you contact me, but don't hear back for more than a week,
it is very likely that I am excessively backlogged or the message was
caught in the spam filters. Please don't hesitate to resend a message if
you feel that it did not reach my attention.