Re: [teiid-dev] What should we call this artifact?
How about:
"Def-driven VDB" or "d-vdb"?
Dynamic VDB seems good too.
Ted
----- Original Message -----
From: "Ramesh Reddy" <rareddy(a)redhat.com>
To: teiid-users(a)lists.jboss.org, teiid-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
Sent: Friday, August 28, 2009 3:05:56 PM GMT -06:00 US/Canada Central
Subject: [teiid-dev] What should we call this artifact?
Hi,
You all know that starting with 6.2 release we have a new feature called
"Connector Supplied Metadata", where connectors will be able to import
metadata dynamically at runtime for data integration purposes.
To use this feature user need to write ".def" file, which we been
calling internally "vdbLess" mode, that does not sound correct. We are
building a VDB and all the access is to this no different than a regular
VDB, so it is a VDB just not built using the Designer!
I have been calling it "DEF file based VDB", some names thrown out are
"dynamic vdb" or "direct vdb" etc. Can you suggest a good name for
this,
so that we all can refer it by the same name?
Thanks
Ramesh..
_______________________________________________
teiid-dev mailing list
teiid-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/teiid-dev